A thread on the evolution of Hindu kavacha literature:
Typical characteristics of a kavacha are as follows: 1. They are shlokas invoking various names of the deity. 2. Each name is invoked for protection. 3. Typically protection is sought in various directions (East, West,...)
And on various parts of the body. 4. Simply reciting is sufficient to obtain protection (though the kavachas occurring in tantric literature are accompanied with a ritual deployment).
This literature is voluminous. Collating all material from itihasa-puranas, tantra/agamas
Would be a research endeavor for a PhD student. Some typical samples below -
Drawing from my own tradition, dvAdashanAma panjaram is popular among vaiShNavas - It begins with "purastAt keshavaH pAtu" - 12 forms of viShNu starting with Keshava are invoked for protection in all
8 directions along with up/down and "inside and outside". It ends with "I have entered the protective cage of 12 names. I have nothing to fear".
Narayana and Vishnu kavachas can be found in Garuda and Bhagavata puranas. The one from Bhagavata purana has its scope expanded to
include protection ad various times and geographic spaces apart from the usual directions/limbs we see in other shlokas.
Gayatri kavacha from is another typical composition where sandhyA, sAvitrI, gAyatrI and sarasvati are asked for protection from East, South, West and Noth.
It then proceeds to request protection on various parts of the body.
Almost always kavachas start with "protect me in the east/front; protect me in west/back; left/north; right/south".
An interesting question is, what's the earliest composition we can identify as some form of
kavacha. We'll note this line from Mihir Yasht in passing:
Helping & protecting, protection in the back and protecting the front, Mithra, the lort of wide pastures...
In taittiriya samhita, we find the mantra in First Kanda (I.2.12.2)
indraghoShastvA vasubhiH purastAt pAtu
"May the roar of indra with vasus protect you in the front"
majojavAstvA pitR^ibhir dakshiNataH pAtu
"May the swift-minded ones with the fathers protect you in the right"
prachetAstvA rudraiH pashchAt pAtu
"May the wise one with the rudras protect you from behind"
vishvakarmA tvAdityair uttarataH pAtu
"May vishvakarma with Adityas protect you on the left"
The shrauta application is in the context of soma sacrifice. During the construction of
uttaravedi (high altar) which is to the east of mahavedi (great altar), after markings are done, digging the earth with a wooden sword (sphya), depositing the earch on the altars, washing, leveling, and mixing with sand, these mantras are used to sprinkle the prokashni water
Technically protection is for the altar but one can notice the germ of the kavacha here.
Further in the 3rd kANDa, we see the mantra to indra and bR^ihaspati:
bR^ihaspatirnaH pari pAtu pashchAd uttarasmAd adharAt aghAyoH|
indraH purastAd uta madhyato naH sakhA sakhibhyo
varivaH kR^Notu ||
May brhaspati guard us from the evil schemer from behind, from above and below;
May Indra guard us in front and middle, friend with friend, grant us expanse.
This is used in a kAmyeShTi to escape from "binding fetters". Indra is kshattra and BR^ihaspati is
brahma. With the foe-slaying indra and with brahman power, the bonds are broken.
A clear kavacha like mantra can be seen in Taittiriya Samhita 1.8.7.1 (occurs in udakashanti collection too)
ye devAH puraHsado 'gninetrA rakshohaNas te naH pAntu te no'avantu tebhyo namaH tebhyaH
svAhA...
The Gods seated in the east lead by agni, the rakshasa-slayers - May they help and protect us. For them salutations and svAhA.
Similarly to Gods seated in south, led by agni; to Gods seated in west, led by SavitR^i; to Gods seated in north led by Varuna; to Gods seated
above, led by bR^ihaspati.
When we come to atharvaveda, there's a wealth of mantras and practices for "directional" and various kinds of protection. (probably a separate thread)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A note on mantras. There was an offline conversation with an acquaintance regarding whether mantras should be kept secret or be open sourced for anyone to open and study. While, obviously the outcome was a stalemate, one thing became clear. It's actually hard to define a mantra
While an H has an intuitive grasp of what it is, describing it is another story. I was reflecting on this briefly. One can go via the etymological route - *men -PIE to think. However, Avestan has the cognate manthra (mãthra actually with ã being a nasal vowel).
Looking at how manthra is understood can actually throw good light on what a mantra is on our side. The implications and all the nuances of the word actually goes at least back to IIr. Let's start with Airyama-ishyô.
A sampler of vratas to keep while learning certain samavedic mantras. The upanayana ceremony confers basic eligibility to start learning the veda. The student keeps the usual austerities while living with teacher - moderation in food, fasting, obeying teacher,
Sleeping on the floor. This list is long and well documented in dharma shastras regarding the rules of veda vrata. Now, certain higher mantras require even higher austerities. For e.g. performance of āditya-vrata makes the student eligible to learn shukriya mantras.
Nothing should come between the sun and the student during the day. The student wears a single cloth. He doesn't enter the water more than knee-deep. After one year, he can learn the shukriyas.
Subaqueous fire problem: A reflective thread.
In the past I've tweeted on this topic which is essentially a highlight of textual evidences and my opinion and let readers draw their own conclusions. In contrast, this thread is an attempt at my reasoning in the form of FAQ.
1. What is the subaqueous fire or "fire in the water" problem?
Rigveda talks about fire that's from waters in numerous instances. "apsu antar" - inside waters; "agnim samudra vāsasam" - agni, having ocean as clothes.
A conception of fire inside the water is strange and there has to be a reason for this conception. Finding a satisfactory reason for this reason is what I call the "fire in water problem".
A short note on "Purusha" - the cosmic "Man". For vaiṣṇavas, the deity of puruṣa sūkta is none other than nārāyaṇa.
This hasn't stopped shaiva leaning post vedic texts to appropriate the hymn for themselves.
The emergence if the figure puruṣa nārāyaṇa in śukla yajurvedic texts sort of favors the vaiṣṇava view. Also, by the time of yajurveda, uttaranārāyaṇa portion had appended itself and the wives of purusha being Lakshmi + hrī/shrī favor the vaiṣṇava view again.
Was the original purusha of RV an independent figure later appropriated by vaishnavas? I was agnostic for a long time. Currently I tentatively posit no. The mantras of RV hymn appear with variation in other vedas.
Two tales of 'magick'.
Note: I'll try to be vague to keep the identities of concerned parties.
First:
There was this vaidika and a vidvān. He had a set of students learning śruti from him. All of a sudden, one of his student went incommunicado. The vaidika paid him a visit.
It turned out the student developed white kuṣṭha and became depressed. Medications weren't working.. It was so worse that he quit his job and rarely came out of his room.
The student asked "Guruji, you often say śruti has solutions for laukika problems. Is there no remedy for me?"
The vaidika remembered a prayoga given in vidhāna of indra specifically for this issue. The procedure itself is simple (relatively speaking). It involves doing the japa
A thread on sociological musings before I go on prolonged hibernation. 1. Social science of India is hopeless gas. Discourses around avarna/savarna conflict, dalitism, 'brahminical' practices are nothing but noxious gas emissions.
2. Correct way of formulating should be based on "kin group" - this has crisp definition of "relationship by the way of blood or marriage". Empirical data has to be collected across various regions of India and catalogued.
Peoples of India project is a step in the right direction. Additional fieldwork needs to be done to rank the kin groups by economic status. This should be the bare minimum dataset from which any sociological model can be synthesized and validated.