The huge "hedge fund short" 101
Many have published a chart that say "hedge funds have the largest speculative short futures position in history". The data is accurate. It also needs interpretation.
Here's my chart it's a few weeks old but illustrates my point
The hedge fund short is someone else's long. That long is institutional investors. It's very big. But that is not the important story. This unlike the ES charts which looked the same and were a choose your fighter Long Only Simps vs Hedge funds (which I got completely wrong)
Respect Long only Simps 🫡
Hedge funds short ES covered like mad. I was wrong.
But fixed income futures positions are quite different. While the long side of the positions are indeed levering up by long only asset managers the short side which is getting so much doomism is more complex
H/T @leadlagreport for this example
Why do hedge funds short bond futures
Speculation IS a real thing!
BUT also to hedge out interest rate risk on something they are long in the derivatives or cash market like:
Corporate and High Yield Bonds, Physical Treasury Bonds, Mortgage Bonds, Muni's, Converts, EM debt etc
For example let's say long only institutions bid up futures to lever up a bet. A hedge fund can buy the correspond US Treasury to that futures contract and take out a spread between the futures and cash markets. It's an arbitrage between the cost of leverage in the futures
Markets and the actual cost of leverage the hedge fund is able to achieve in their funding of the UST long position.
Now. It's possible that the hedge fund is purely speculative or it's possible that they own the bond and are using repo to finance the long and are short the
Futures. Let's go to the data. As this "historic" futures short has been built. Levered long positions have grown by half a Trillion dollars. Either that should be added to the long position of real money
Or should be subtracted from the short position of hedge funds who are doing the cash and carry arbitrage. I won't show all my data but just say that this is a complex topic and the signal in Fixed Income is pretty weak regarding TFF rates data the doomers are posting
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To avoid confusion. Let's clarify how things work 101 IPO
To make it the most simple possible let's assume an IPO is 💯 purchased with bank deposits of savers
They give the company a bank deposit and the company gives them shares.
Notice bank deposits systemwide have not
changed. However at that moment savers own more equity as a percent of their wealth than they had before the deal. Company has more bank deposits. In a normal world the company typically has to offer incentive to get the investor to change their asset allocation. In worlds
In which savers have excess savings one might think they would accept less or even negative incentive. But that's pretty unlikely because they could buy any or all assets if they were willing to accept high prices. Nonetheless what investors broadly are willing to accept as
After a big drawdown for just about everything on Friday I thought I would step back and avoid the histrionics of the fairly volatile year and see what's what on the most important from of investing. "Always own beta". This is my #1 principle 1/n
Notice that through Friday 100% Allocation to SPY has generated an 8.5% Return outperforming cash by almost 700bp. Thats a super solid return consistent with a broad strong bull market and economy. However it came with a scary 7% drawdown. 60/40 has really not done well.
While the return has been 300bp over cash, bond's didnt really protect you much at all. Before I jump into my more balanced forms of beta, NDX has obviously been a better place to be than SPY as NDX returns (not shown) are another 600bp higher. Kudos for those who
Stealing from the future 101. This 101 will attempt to describe facts. It is not political except to say that the outcome was entirely bipartisan. It spans 46 years of a wide variety of political alignments.
The big takeaway is every single member of society has benefitted
What has happened but the those who are older have benefited the most due to compounded benefits of what has happened.
What has happened is over the last 46 years the U.S. national debt has grown at an annualized pace of 8.6% from roughly 1tn to 39tn. During the same time
Nominal GDP has grown by 5.5% annualized. The government share of GDP has been roughly 18% of the economy. As government has grown substantially faster than the overall economy the growth of government deficit spending has increased nominal GDP by roughly 60bp per year.
Yikes. Some say US real rates are low and falling. Some say they are negative others say they are at Covid highs. How can smart people have such different opinions.
It comes down to three basic questions that are a matter of faith.
Real yields are supposed to be the yield you get from investing in nominal bonds minus the inflation you experience while holding them which reduces your real purchasing power.
So here are the "religious" issues.
1. What inflation matters and what is the best measure of
Future expectations? 2. Are nominal yields "manipulated" 3. Are tips yields "manipulated"
While professional investors debate these concepts there is a fringe element who simply will not except CPI or any of the traditional measures of inflation as anything but a conspiracy
The Internet boom and bust - a story part 3. Like all things there are similarities to today and differences.
My own experience during 1995-2002 year by year with highlights.
In this Part I will finish up with the 1998 panic easing and then get into specific 1999-2000 stuff
As mentioned in Part 2 and the added thread on the Asian debt crisis of 1997 the after effect of that unwind had a major impact on markets and policymakers thought 1998.
But at a personal level things were absolutely nuts. I survived my own losses due to the crisis
And acquitted myself adequately in front of Sandy and Jamie (thanks to Artie Hyde and Alan Marks backing) and kept my job as head of global equity derivatives trading and structured products. But the Smith Barney merger had yet to close
The Internet boom and bust - a story part 2. Like all things there are similarities to today and differences.
My own experience during 1995-2002 year by year with highlights.
In this part I'll start building up both the tech highlights but focus more on the markets
This time periods was also highly tumultuous for Salomon brothers, financial market participants, policymaker actions, and geopolitics. Like today central bankers, made many mistakes and bailed out various players, and world changing geopolitical developments occurred. Unlike
Today, the deficit went to a surplus and the national debt and the debt of the sovereign developed market was small.
But before I jump into all that I want to mention a often ignored simultaneous happening during the 90's and a funny story of how nonsense can occur during