1/ The woke have taken over education, and it's worse then you think.
This teacher, who doesn't know when America was founded, says she teaches students about Protesting and Black Lives Matter, but won't teach the official curriculum
The woke education take over explained: A🧵
2/ Isaac Gottesman (an advocate of Critical Social Justice/wokeness) wrote the book "The Critical Turn in Education," and explains how the 1960's radical leftist brought Marxism into universities - in the 1970's, and took over the field of education in the 70's and 80's.
3/ Gottesman also explains that in the 70's and 80's the marxists actually pushed the original Marxist ideas past where Marx took them amking them even more radical. He also freely admits that the marxists "radicalized" the field of education.
Don't take my word for it👇👇👇
4/ Let's take a look at how they did it.
The story starts with Brazillian Marxist Paulo Freire.
Freire was influenced by Communist dictator Vladimir Lenin. But he was also influenced by "Critical Theory" a method of engagement created by neo-marxists at the "Frankfurt School"
5/ Critical Theory is a method of critiquing society. Critical Theorists have a vision for society, and use critical theories to say whatever disagrees with their neo-marxist vision is oppressive and evil
6/ Paulo Freire used Critical Theory to create what he called "Critical Pedagogy," a theory he laid out in his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed." (pedagogy = a theory of how to teach)
Freire says the goal of Critical Pedagogy is the marxist transformation of all of society:
7/ Freire is not an obscure theorist, he's the most cited Scholar in education. Citations are one way to measure of how influential someone's work is, and Friere has *530216* citations.
Albert Einstein, the greatest physicist ever, has 155,730 citations. Less then half of Freire
8/ Freire became so influential because a number of theorists in the 80's decided to pick up on his work, and launder his ideas into colleges of education.
Henry Giroux is probably did more then anyone else to radicalize the field of education by bringing in Freire's work.
9/ Giroux began as a neo-marxist (see below, From "teachers as Intellectuals") who was dedicatd to using a neo-marxist framework to transform schools into a place where he could teach his radical leftist values to students and create a revolution.
however...
10/ Giroux began to realize that our enlightenment liberal vision of education that believes in objective truth, knowledge, rigor, quality, and so on was not going to be taken over by the failed ideology of neo-marxism. So he needed something a little stronger to do the job...
11/ So in his book "Border Crossings" Giroux turned to POSTMODERNISM and argued:
"what has been presented in our social-political and our intellectual traditions as knowledge, truth, objectivity, and reason are actually merely the effects of a particular form of social power"
12/ The reason Marxism failed is because it wasn't true. So, in order to get around that problem, the radicals attacked reason, objectivity, and truth.
If reason, truth, and objectivity get in the way of Neo-Marxism, the Marxists get rid of...truth, reason, and objectivity.
13/ This mixture of Postmodernism and Critical Pedagogy has, according to education theorist Michael Apple, become embedded in education literature.
Apple also says teachers should implement ideas from Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci.
This is where we are in education now...
14/ There is one other concept we need to look at before we finish
That is the idea of "Critical Constructivism."
Critical Constructivism was an idea that was developed by Joe Kincheloe, who believes that education was always inherently political.
15/ Critical Constructivists deny objective, absolute, universal truth. As such, Critical Constructivists believe the standard by which we judge knowledge is not truth...its politics.
In other words, we decide what is true on the basis of politics, not what is actually true.
16/ According to Kincheloe The main goal of Critical Constructivism in the classroom is to analyze knowledge claims in terms of which people/groups gains social and political power as a result of those claim...not by whether or not those claims are true!
17/ In other words, they want us to construct our knowledge and truth claims using the marxist vision of social liberation as the ultimate standard of what we believe, rather then using truth as the ultimate standard for what we should believe.
18/ In a 1990 NY Review of books article, John Searle captured the goal of both Critical Pedagogy and Critical Constructivism in a single sentence:
"Notwithstanding its opaque prose, Giroux’s message should be clear: the aim of a liberal education is to create political radicals"
19/ These radical left wing theories of education which say the goal of education is to create political radicals are entrenched in our colleges of education. The result is now that we get teachers like the ones in this video who think teaching is all about leftist politics:
20/ The solution is not clear.
But one thing is clear, that political radicals have taken over our colleges of education, and are using them as a way to indoctrinate students into leftist ideology.
The first step is to get involved. Join your local @Moms4Liberty chapter...
@Moms4Liberty 21/
Getting involved in your local school board is another great way to make progress.
Finally, make an effort to be involved in the education of your kids. Know what they are being taught in school, and know what their teachers are telling them.
One last thing....
@Moms4Liberty 22/
Follow people like @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @Moms4Liberty @4TiffanyJustice and learn about what is going on so you can fight it effectively.
/fin
Thanks for reading 🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/
I realize the over-feminization of public life is a problem, and I think wokeness is also feminine coded.
But leftist extremism of wokeness are not necessarily feminine coded.
In the 60's and 70's the radical left was led by violent, militant, masculine men...
2/ The left engaged in bombings, riots, kidnapping, riots, and other such sort of behavior. They formed militia's armed themselves to the teeth, and made straight-forward demands while engaging in direct confrontation.
In fact, feminists used to complain about how the left...
3/ Was run entirely by men. This was a common theme in feminist writing and discourse.
The recent increase in popularity of guys like Hasan Piker (or Bob Vylan, the rappers who chanted "death to the IDF" onstage at a festival) are attempts by the left to re-masculinize...
Indigenous displacement is an idea from postcolonial theory often used to normatively criticize western nations; often using statistical demographic change as evidence of the charge.
My question is: why this doesn't idea apply to London?
2/ The point I am trying to bring out here is related to a question asked by the philosopher Joseph Heath: "What is the difference between a settler and an immigrant?"
Concepts like "indigenous displacement" appear to be neutral descriptions but are in fact normatively loaded...
3/ And the result is that they get deployed according to the normative political considerations of the person using them.
This is why Europeans who move to the U.S. are called "settlers" but Syrian refugees get called immigrants.
"Catholics would be tolerated on the fringes of society"
This sentence is why the dissident right will fail. Trad-Caths/Catholic Integralists see protestants as an abhorration of the true faith. So there's *zero* chance they ever agree to be "tolerated at the fringe of society."
The dissident right has a Protestant wing and a catholic wing.
Protestant DR types think some form of *protestant* Christianity (usually but not always some form of Calvinism) needs to be the default religion of the public.
Trad-caths think it should be catholicism...
And the trad-caths are never, evr, going to let the protestant calvinists (whom the catholics view as a heretical abhorration of true Christianity) force catholics to be merely "tolerated at the fringes."
Likewise, protestants will *never* submit to catholic rule. Ever.
Since "noticing" appears to be a thing, I'd like to say that I "notice" things as well....And I can't help but *notice* the obsession that certain people have with Israel, even though other nations (China, India, Russia, etc) impact the U.S. far more....
I also can't help but notice that those same sorts of people are obsessed the influence of wealth Jews, but have nothing to say about the influence of money from China, Qatar, Russia, India, and so on.
The Jews are, apparantly, an item of incredibly deep concern...
For a great number of people, and I can't help but *notice* that the far greater and more pernicious influence (and subversion) coming from foreign money in other countries gets mysteriously ignored, and I *notice* that Israel is held to a higher standard than every other country
1/ Wokeness is the alloy of the political ideology and moral value framework from Critical Theory with the social constructivist worldview and epistemology of postmodernism.
As the political side of woke recedes culturally, it leaves behind the underlying postmodern worldview.
2/ The teleology of the woke project came from the moral commitments of intersectional social justice (Trans-rights, Race based activism, etc)
Those movements are being dissolved by their own incoherence and absurdity (Land acknowledgements, claiming men can become women, etc)
3/ The dissolution and exhaustion of the political movement that provided the teleology and moral value framework for wokeness leaves the entire social movement around which those things were built without any thing to serve as locus for meaning, purpose, or values.
The left has what @wesyang calls a "Vertically Integrated Messaging Apparatus." It's an apparatus of messaging distribution which is owned and operated by leftists top to bottom, and disseminates only the information which aligns with leftist moral norms and political priorities.
@wesyang The lefts messaging apparatus used to be the information distributor for all of society (we called it "mainstream media") but new media alternatives and the rollback of social media censorship regime's mean society is no longer a captive audience for the lefts messaging apparatus