1/ The woke have taken over education, and it's worse then you think.
This teacher, who doesn't know when America was founded, says she teaches students about Protesting and Black Lives Matter, but won't teach the official curriculum
The woke education take over explained: A🧵
2/ Isaac Gottesman (an advocate of Critical Social Justice/wokeness) wrote the book "The Critical Turn in Education," and explains how the 1960's radical leftist brought Marxism into universities - in the 1970's, and took over the field of education in the 70's and 80's.
3/ Gottesman also explains that in the 70's and 80's the marxists actually pushed the original Marxist ideas past where Marx took them amking them even more radical. He also freely admits that the marxists "radicalized" the field of education.
Don't take my word for it👇👇👇
4/ Let's take a look at how they did it.
The story starts with Brazillian Marxist Paulo Freire.
Freire was influenced by Communist dictator Vladimir Lenin. But he was also influenced by "Critical Theory" a method of engagement created by neo-marxists at the "Frankfurt School"
5/ Critical Theory is a method of critiquing society. Critical Theorists have a vision for society, and use critical theories to say whatever disagrees with their neo-marxist vision is oppressive and evil
6/ Paulo Freire used Critical Theory to create what he called "Critical Pedagogy," a theory he laid out in his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed." (pedagogy = a theory of how to teach)
Freire says the goal of Critical Pedagogy is the marxist transformation of all of society:
7/ Freire is not an obscure theorist, he's the most cited Scholar in education. Citations are one way to measure of how influential someone's work is, and Friere has *530216* citations.
Albert Einstein, the greatest physicist ever, has 155,730 citations. Less then half of Freire
8/ Freire became so influential because a number of theorists in the 80's decided to pick up on his work, and launder his ideas into colleges of education.
Henry Giroux is probably did more then anyone else to radicalize the field of education by bringing in Freire's work.
9/ Giroux began as a neo-marxist (see below, From "teachers as Intellectuals") who was dedicatd to using a neo-marxist framework to transform schools into a place where he could teach his radical leftist values to students and create a revolution.
however...
10/ Giroux began to realize that our enlightenment liberal vision of education that believes in objective truth, knowledge, rigor, quality, and so on was not going to be taken over by the failed ideology of neo-marxism. So he needed something a little stronger to do the job...
11/ So in his book "Border Crossings" Giroux turned to POSTMODERNISM and argued:
"what has been presented in our social-political and our intellectual traditions as knowledge, truth, objectivity, and reason are actually merely the effects of a particular form of social power"
12/ The reason Marxism failed is because it wasn't true. So, in order to get around that problem, the radicals attacked reason, objectivity, and truth.
If reason, truth, and objectivity get in the way of Neo-Marxism, the Marxists get rid of...truth, reason, and objectivity.
13/ This mixture of Postmodernism and Critical Pedagogy has, according to education theorist Michael Apple, become embedded in education literature.
Apple also says teachers should implement ideas from Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci.
This is where we are in education now...
14/ There is one other concept we need to look at before we finish
That is the idea of "Critical Constructivism."
Critical Constructivism was an idea that was developed by Joe Kincheloe, who believes that education was always inherently political.
15/ Critical Constructivists deny objective, absolute, universal truth. As such, Critical Constructivists believe the standard by which we judge knowledge is not truth...its politics.
In other words, we decide what is true on the basis of politics, not what is actually true.
16/ According to Kincheloe The main goal of Critical Constructivism in the classroom is to analyze knowledge claims in terms of which people/groups gains social and political power as a result of those claim...not by whether or not those claims are true!
17/ In other words, they want us to construct our knowledge and truth claims using the marxist vision of social liberation as the ultimate standard of what we believe, rather then using truth as the ultimate standard for what we should believe.
18/ In a 1990 NY Review of books article, John Searle captured the goal of both Critical Pedagogy and Critical Constructivism in a single sentence:
"Notwithstanding its opaque prose, Giroux’s message should be clear: the aim of a liberal education is to create political radicals"
19/ These radical left wing theories of education which say the goal of education is to create political radicals are entrenched in our colleges of education. The result is now that we get teachers like the ones in this video who think teaching is all about leftist politics:
20/ The solution is not clear.
But one thing is clear, that political radicals have taken over our colleges of education, and are using them as a way to indoctrinate students into leftist ideology.
The first step is to get involved. Join your local @Moms4Liberty chapter...
@Moms4Liberty 21/
Getting involved in your local school board is another great way to make progress.
Finally, make an effort to be involved in the education of your kids. Know what they are being taught in school, and know what their teachers are telling them.
One last thing....
@Moms4Liberty 22/
Follow people like @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @Moms4Liberty @4TiffanyJustice and learn about what is going on so you can fight it effectively.
/fin
Thanks for reading 🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ This is what people mean when they talk about "woke right."
The idea that the entire culture is a system of ideology operating at the subconscious level that brainwashes the masses comes directly from the radical-leftist counterculture of the 60's.
2/ There is a segment on the right who saw the dominance of the left and have been studying the leftist counterculture literature. They accept the left's view regarding how culture and society work, and have decided to adopt the radical lefts worldview, methods and tactics...
3/ as well as the leftists intellectual tool of "critical theory" in the service of achieving right-wing political ends.
It's a huge mistake to adopt the left's worldview and it's understanding of culture because that worldview is the reason the left went insane from 2016-2022.
1/ Healthcare organizations are bringing DEI into everything because accreditation agencies that give the accreditation required to receive medicare funding (effectively gatekeeping medicare funding) are making DEI part of their mission.
Woke Accreditation agencies,
A Thread🧵
2/ Let begin with medical education.
The Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education accredits organizations offering continuing medical education.
They have decided to make DEI initiatives central to what they do
3/ Their strategic plans says they are "incorporating the issues of diversity, health equity, and inclusion into all aspects of accredited education."
This means medical organizations that do continuing education will be required to have DEI incorporated into their programs.
Gen z is going through gender-based asymmetric polarization because the left convinced women everything is political and refusal to adopt leftist politics makes one complicit in oppression
This idea has been floating around universities since the 90's
The problem with the claim was pointed out in 1993 by John Searle:
That a thing has political consequences does not mean the essence of the thing is political, the purpose of the thing is political or the standards by which the thing is judged ought to be political standards...
By way of example: every action humans do (an most thoughts they have) effects their heart-rate.
This does not mean that "everything is cardiovascular," or that the standard by which everything is judged it "what effect does this have on heart-rate."
Remember, the radical left advances their ideology dialectically: they set up a thesis (identity politics), and antithesis (economic class warfare), then create "synthesis" made from elements of both.
What AOC is trying to do is mix identity politics with class warfare...
The goal here is to try and pick up economic issues (inflation, poverty, wage stagnation, unemployment) and link them into the identity politics "intersectionality" framework.
The way this will work is by connecting their map of class to their identity politics framework...
2/ Disparate impact in the United States refers to practices refer to rules that adversely affect one group of people more than another, even if the rules applied are neutral.
This means disparities in outcome at the group level can be taken as evidence of discrimination...
3/ This means even if the rules are neutral and applied fairly to everyone, if a group is underrepresented that group can potentially sue for discrimination.
This is the anchor at the core of civil rights law that allows woke activists to engage in legal warfare.
1/ A Hospital in Missouri gave "Transgender Medicine" to an 8 year-old.
A study of trans identified youth in Missouri included children as young as 8 years-old. Red states have some of the worst offenders for giving experimental cross-sex procedures to kids.
Let's take a look🧵
2/ According to Children's Mercy Hospital in Kansas City has performed up to 34 sex change procedures on children. Researchers from that hospital say kids as young as 8 years old come in for what they call euphemistically call "gender affirming care" stoptheharm.com
3/ It is very common for hospitals in red, conservative, republican voting states to engage in some of the worst forms of experimental cross-sex procedures on children unless laws are passed that stop them.
Missouri has such laws, but laws in other states have been struck down.