1/ The woke have taken over education, and it's worse then you think.
This teacher, who doesn't know when America was founded, says she teaches students about Protesting and Black Lives Matter, but won't teach the official curriculum
The woke education take over explained: A🧵
2/ Isaac Gottesman (an advocate of Critical Social Justice/wokeness) wrote the book "The Critical Turn in Education," and explains how the 1960's radical leftist brought Marxism into universities - in the 1970's, and took over the field of education in the 70's and 80's.
3/ Gottesman also explains that in the 70's and 80's the marxists actually pushed the original Marxist ideas past where Marx took them amking them even more radical. He also freely admits that the marxists "radicalized" the field of education.
Don't take my word for it👇👇👇
4/ Let's take a look at how they did it.
The story starts with Brazillian Marxist Paulo Freire.
Freire was influenced by Communist dictator Vladimir Lenin. But he was also influenced by "Critical Theory" a method of engagement created by neo-marxists at the "Frankfurt School"
5/ Critical Theory is a method of critiquing society. Critical Theorists have a vision for society, and use critical theories to say whatever disagrees with their neo-marxist vision is oppressive and evil
6/ Paulo Freire used Critical Theory to create what he called "Critical Pedagogy," a theory he laid out in his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed." (pedagogy = a theory of how to teach)
Freire says the goal of Critical Pedagogy is the marxist transformation of all of society:
7/ Freire is not an obscure theorist, he's the most cited Scholar in education. Citations are one way to measure of how influential someone's work is, and Friere has *530216* citations.
Albert Einstein, the greatest physicist ever, has 155,730 citations. Less then half of Freire
8/ Freire became so influential because a number of theorists in the 80's decided to pick up on his work, and launder his ideas into colleges of education.
Henry Giroux is probably did more then anyone else to radicalize the field of education by bringing in Freire's work.
9/ Giroux began as a neo-marxist (see below, From "teachers as Intellectuals") who was dedicatd to using a neo-marxist framework to transform schools into a place where he could teach his radical leftist values to students and create a revolution.
however...
10/ Giroux began to realize that our enlightenment liberal vision of education that believes in objective truth, knowledge, rigor, quality, and so on was not going to be taken over by the failed ideology of neo-marxism. So he needed something a little stronger to do the job...
11/ So in his book "Border Crossings" Giroux turned to POSTMODERNISM and argued:
"what has been presented in our social-political and our intellectual traditions as knowledge, truth, objectivity, and reason are actually merely the effects of a particular form of social power"
12/ The reason Marxism failed is because it wasn't true. So, in order to get around that problem, the radicals attacked reason, objectivity, and truth.
If reason, truth, and objectivity get in the way of Neo-Marxism, the Marxists get rid of...truth, reason, and objectivity.
13/ This mixture of Postmodernism and Critical Pedagogy has, according to education theorist Michael Apple, become embedded in education literature.
Apple also says teachers should implement ideas from Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci.
This is where we are in education now...
14/ There is one other concept we need to look at before we finish
That is the idea of "Critical Constructivism."
Critical Constructivism was an idea that was developed by Joe Kincheloe, who believes that education was always inherently political.
15/ Critical Constructivists deny objective, absolute, universal truth. As such, Critical Constructivists believe the standard by which we judge knowledge is not truth...its politics.
In other words, we decide what is true on the basis of politics, not what is actually true.
16/ According to Kincheloe The main goal of Critical Constructivism in the classroom is to analyze knowledge claims in terms of which people/groups gains social and political power as a result of those claim...not by whether or not those claims are true!
17/ In other words, they want us to construct our knowledge and truth claims using the marxist vision of social liberation as the ultimate standard of what we believe, rather then using truth as the ultimate standard for what we should believe.
18/ In a 1990 NY Review of books article, John Searle captured the goal of both Critical Pedagogy and Critical Constructivism in a single sentence:
"Notwithstanding its opaque prose, Giroux’s message should be clear: the aim of a liberal education is to create political radicals"
19/ These radical left wing theories of education which say the goal of education is to create political radicals are entrenched in our colleges of education. The result is now that we get teachers like the ones in this video who think teaching is all about leftist politics:
20/ The solution is not clear.
But one thing is clear, that political radicals have taken over our colleges of education, and are using them as a way to indoctrinate students into leftist ideology.
The first step is to get involved. Join your local @Moms4Liberty chapter...
@Moms4Liberty 21/
Getting involved in your local school board is another great way to make progress.
Finally, make an effort to be involved in the education of your kids. Know what they are being taught in school, and know what their teachers are telling them.
One last thing....
@Moms4Liberty 22/
Follow people like @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @Moms4Liberty @4TiffanyJustice and learn about what is going on so you can fight it effectively.
/fin
Thanks for reading 🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Almost all of the MAGA base is with Trump and they support Israel over Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Iranian Mullah's.
The Israel obsessed crowd and their anti-Semitic fellow travelers are a tiny minority and their influence is a mirage.
2/ MAGA is 77 million Trump voters, almost none of them care about the ideas of the dissident right (alt-right, woke-right,) online influencers. Trumps base is not turning on him and siding with Iranian Islamic terrorists just so online influencers can own the Israeli's...
3/ Trump has his own ideas, and makes his own decisions.
The influencers, thinkers, and writers who think they get to set the agenda and use Trump as a vessel to accomplish their own agenda have no ideas what's going on. So let me help everyone out:
1/
The riots happening in LA are not organic or spontaneous.
They're designed to look chaotic to cover up the fact that they're well funded, exceptionally organized, and carried out by well trained activists using intelligent, highly developed tactics.
Here's a primer:
2/ First, notice the protestors have shields (pic 1)
These types of shields were used by the 2024 pro-Hamas rioters (pic 2), and 2020 BLM rioters (pic 3)
Each shield takes 3 hours to make, and activists spend all day making them (pic 4) That's not spontaneous, it takes planning
3/ Those shields are not cardboard signs. They are designed to *look* like cardboard signs.
They're in fact made of plywood and have metal handles (as seen in the pics below). They have a cardboard sign attached to the front to disguise the fact that they're made of wood.
In the Trump/Elon dispute Elon represents fiscal reality, Trump represents Political reality.
Elon knows the Unite States is headed toward financial collapse caused by its debt, Trump knows voters will never accept the spending cuts and tax hikes needed to solve the debt crisis.
Elon is correct that the United States 36 TRILLION dollar debt will eventually crush the American economy and eat it's budget.
Trump is correct that voters will never accept the tax hikes or spending cuts (especially social security and medicare cuts) needed to pay off the debt.
Elon is saying "The financial crisis is coming. Either we deal with it now or we will deal with the financial collapse of the American economy."
Trump is saying "We can only do what is politically possible. Voters refuse to elect congressmen who will make large cuts to spending"
I think society is returning to the desert of the real.
The social narratives which animated people's lives have lost their power and are dying, and the counter-movements they spawned will (eventually) die alongside them.
We are now living in a decaying hyper-reality...
Baudrillard said we're so saturated in representations and images from mass media (T.V., Movies, books, social media, etc) that images become more salient to us and matter more then the real world, so artificial representations become more "real" to us then actual reality itself.
The result, says Baudrillard is that what feel real to us, what feel immediately important, salient, and meaningful to us is whatever emerges from the ecosystem of artificial, curated, simulated, and manufactured representations produced by the vehicles of mass communication.
1/ Woke activists bully people by using social pressure. They publicly shame and attack people to make them feel like all of society is rejecting them.
See the photo below? They want people feel like all of society is doing that to them.
2/ Call-Outs and Cancel Culture are related but different. Cancel culture tries to get people fired or de-platformed as a way to punish them economically and professionally in order to silence them.
It uses economic and professional punishment to make people fall in line.
3/ Call-outs operate using a very different set of mechanisms: social pressure, the sense of hyper-visibility we feel when we are publicly humiliated, and fear of social rejection.
Call-out leverage these Social Mechanisms in order to apply pressure and make people fall in line.
The woke left thinks what is true depends who says it and which side they are on. Only claims made by "COUNTER-HEGEMONIC" people are believed
The woke right thinks what is true depends on who says it and which side they are on. Only claims made by "DISSIDENT" people are believed
People keep saying the right can't be woke because wokeness denies objective reality, and the right doesn't deny science and biology the way the left does.
That's wrong.
Once the right adopts the belief that truth is matter of who says it and which side they are on....
then it is only a matter of time until they begin denying scientific and biological truths because they are being made by people with the wrong politics.
You can actually see this dynamic in the Glen Greenwald discourse that has shown up over the last several days...