1/ The woke have taken over education, and it's worse then you think.
This teacher, who doesn't know when America was founded, says she teaches students about Protesting and Black Lives Matter, but won't teach the official curriculum
The woke education take over explained: A🧵
2/ Isaac Gottesman (an advocate of Critical Social Justice/wokeness) wrote the book "The Critical Turn in Education," and explains how the 1960's radical leftist brought Marxism into universities - in the 1970's, and took over the field of education in the 70's and 80's.
3/ Gottesman also explains that in the 70's and 80's the marxists actually pushed the original Marxist ideas past where Marx took them amking them even more radical. He also freely admits that the marxists "radicalized" the field of education.
Don't take my word for it👇👇👇
4/ Let's take a look at how they did it.
The story starts with Brazillian Marxist Paulo Freire.
Freire was influenced by Communist dictator Vladimir Lenin. But he was also influenced by "Critical Theory" a method of engagement created by neo-marxists at the "Frankfurt School"
5/ Critical Theory is a method of critiquing society. Critical Theorists have a vision for society, and use critical theories to say whatever disagrees with their neo-marxist vision is oppressive and evil
6/ Paulo Freire used Critical Theory to create what he called "Critical Pedagogy," a theory he laid out in his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed." (pedagogy = a theory of how to teach)
Freire says the goal of Critical Pedagogy is the marxist transformation of all of society:
7/ Freire is not an obscure theorist, he's the most cited Scholar in education. Citations are one way to measure of how influential someone's work is, and Friere has *530216* citations.
Albert Einstein, the greatest physicist ever, has 155,730 citations. Less then half of Freire
8/ Freire became so influential because a number of theorists in the 80's decided to pick up on his work, and launder his ideas into colleges of education.
Henry Giroux is probably did more then anyone else to radicalize the field of education by bringing in Freire's work.
9/ Giroux began as a neo-marxist (see below, From "teachers as Intellectuals") who was dedicatd to using a neo-marxist framework to transform schools into a place where he could teach his radical leftist values to students and create a revolution.
however...
10/ Giroux began to realize that our enlightenment liberal vision of education that believes in objective truth, knowledge, rigor, quality, and so on was not going to be taken over by the failed ideology of neo-marxism. So he needed something a little stronger to do the job...
11/ So in his book "Border Crossings" Giroux turned to POSTMODERNISM and argued:
"what has been presented in our social-political and our intellectual traditions as knowledge, truth, objectivity, and reason are actually merely the effects of a particular form of social power"
12/ The reason Marxism failed is because it wasn't true. So, in order to get around that problem, the radicals attacked reason, objectivity, and truth.
If reason, truth, and objectivity get in the way of Neo-Marxism, the Marxists get rid of...truth, reason, and objectivity.
13/ This mixture of Postmodernism and Critical Pedagogy has, according to education theorist Michael Apple, become embedded in education literature.
Apple also says teachers should implement ideas from Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci.
This is where we are in education now...
14/ There is one other concept we need to look at before we finish
That is the idea of "Critical Constructivism."
Critical Constructivism was an idea that was developed by Joe Kincheloe, who believes that education was always inherently political.
15/ Critical Constructivists deny objective, absolute, universal truth. As such, Critical Constructivists believe the standard by which we judge knowledge is not truth...its politics.
In other words, we decide what is true on the basis of politics, not what is actually true.
16/ According to Kincheloe The main goal of Critical Constructivism in the classroom is to analyze knowledge claims in terms of which people/groups gains social and political power as a result of those claim...not by whether or not those claims are true!
17/ In other words, they want us to construct our knowledge and truth claims using the marxist vision of social liberation as the ultimate standard of what we believe, rather then using truth as the ultimate standard for what we should believe.
18/ In a 1990 NY Review of books article, John Searle captured the goal of both Critical Pedagogy and Critical Constructivism in a single sentence:
"Notwithstanding its opaque prose, Giroux’s message should be clear: the aim of a liberal education is to create political radicals"
19/ These radical left wing theories of education which say the goal of education is to create political radicals are entrenched in our colleges of education. The result is now that we get teachers like the ones in this video who think teaching is all about leftist politics:
20/ The solution is not clear.
But one thing is clear, that political radicals have taken over our colleges of education, and are using them as a way to indoctrinate students into leftist ideology.
The first step is to get involved. Join your local @Moms4Liberty chapter...
@Moms4Liberty 21/
Getting involved in your local school board is another great way to make progress.
Finally, make an effort to be involved in the education of your kids. Know what they are being taught in school, and know what their teachers are telling them.
One last thing....
@Moms4Liberty 22/
Follow people like @ConceptualJames @realchrisrufo @Moms4Liberty @4TiffanyJustice and learn about what is going on so you can fight it effectively.
/fin
Thanks for reading 🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's because they've been hijacked by "Activist Scholars" who use them to spread woke ideology.
These political activists are using universities as vehicles to indoctrinate students into far left ideology
Here are the receipts:🧵
2/ Let's get something clear first.
The problem is NOT merely that some professors have blind-spots that can be corrected by other professors with different views. That's not what I am talking about here....
Activists Scholars are an entirely different problem.
3/
It used to be that University professors would try to teach about ideas as evenhandedly as is possible. Of course everyone has biases, but the idea was that professors would at least TRY to put their biases aside and teach the material in a balanced, fair, evenhanded way...
2/ As I explain in the QT below, Wokeness is deeply postmodern.
For reasons I will briefly explain in the next tweet, postmodern philosophers think it is impossible for us to actually get a grasp on objective, absolute, universal, timeless truths.
-we only have our own perspective
-our thinking is warped by our biases, prejudices, and self-interest
-we are socially conditioned to have certain beleifs
That claims we say are "true" aren't actually, absolute, universal, timeless, and objective.
1/ Radical left-wing activists who opposed liberalism and the enlightenment (and who were high on neo-marxist "Critical Theory" and postmodernism) hijacked western universities,and in doing so hijacked the training ground for staffing all of our sense making institutions...
2/ This is a very tricky problem to deal with because universities are very intricate machines, and fixing universities without breaking them is really hard.
I see a *LOT* of right wing commentray which says "the regime/liberalism/postwar-consensus led to woke!!!"
And.....
3/ They also claim "liberalism could not stop woke, so we need to try Sam Francis, or Carl Schmidt, or Joseph DeMaistre, or other illibefal and non-liberal writers," even though those writers never stopped woke either.
Leftists are *NEVER* going to make a show of calling Marx and other lefty theorissts racist, or to "center" their racism, even though what they say is as bad or worse then anything Jefferson ever wrote.
This must be always met with the good faith test: " they must be asked "are Marx, Engles, and Guevera vitrolic racist,and is that racism baked into the meaning and structure of their moral and political ideology?"
Make them show their cards...
The game is always "this guys was racist therefore his ideas are racist amd bad."
Ok, then do Marx, Engles, Guevara, Foucault, and all the other guys that the lefty social theorists adore.
But they won't, because the goal is to sink Jefferson and his ideals...
1/ They woke attack Merit the way they attack everything else: attacking the MEANING by claiming the social situation in which a thing occurs make that thing racist/sexist/etc.
Merit is "embedded" in "the ideology of whiteness" therefore all the standards of merit are racist.
2/ The next move is to claim the thing they're attackong maintains, reinforces, reproduces, perpetuates, empowers, enables, or otherwise "upholds" a an oppresive social "structure"
This usually is done by claiming the standards and principles in play are racist/sexist/etc.
3/ This is about merit in university applications.
Merit is about "can you do the work according to rigorous objective standards."
The woke attack the standards in the way I described in order to be able to remove them and replace them with their own woke standards.
2/ In 2021 the National Education Association, the largest teacher union in the United States, explicitly endorsed bringing CRT into education (Pic 1)
There'a also a ton of books about CRT in education (Pics 2+3) exactly because CRT is *deeply* embedded in education studies.
3/ In January of 2005, Michael Jennings and Marvin Lynn published an article that explained that they were inventing "Critical Race Pedagogy" (pic 1) by blending Critical Race Theory and Critical Pedagogy (pics 2 + 3)
These people are very explicit about what they are doing.