1/Having trouble remembering what you should look for in vascular dementia on imaging?
Almost everyone worked up for #dementia has infarcts. Which ones are important?
Here’s THE FULL #tweetorial this time on the key findings in vascular dementia
#meded #medtwitter #neurotwitter
2/Vascular cognitive impairment, or its most serious form, vascular dementia, used to be called multi-infarct dementia.
It was thought dementia directly resulted from brain volume loss from infarcts, w/the thought that 50-100cc of infarcted related volume loss caused dementia
3/But that’s now outdated. We now know vascular dementia results from diverse pathologies that all share a common vascular origin.
It’s possible to lose little volume from infarct & still result in dementia.
So if infarcts are common—which contribute to vascular dementia?
4/To understand which findings are key in vascular dementia, think of a vascular insult to the brain like a punch
Just as each punch does damage, so does each infarct
Not all punches are created equal—nor is every infarct as devastating--& both infarcts & punches are cumulative
5/So every if every punch/infarct causes injury, think of dementia as a knock out—enough damage to overwhelm the brain so that it out of the fight.
The same injuries that cause a knock out are the same ones that can cause vascular dementia. So how do you knock someone out?
6/Classic way is to just beat the daylights out of them. It’s how most fights ends—if there is enough damage, they just can’t stand.
This is multi-infarct dementia, but it’s thought of bit differently than it was in the old days
Volume makes an impact, but it’s not everything
7/It’s like a machine gun shooting at a target. You don’t need good aim, eventually something’s going to hit something important enough to take it down
The new concept of multi-infarct dementia is that it’s not volume per se, but enough volume eventually hits something important
8/We used to think that dementia was a direct relationship w/volume lost, but some infarcts are more impactful than others.
But if you have enough infarcts, you will eventually have impactful ones.
So the overall severity of infarcts does still matter.
9/Next way to take someone down? The chokehold--hypoperfusion.
Signs of hypoperfusion on imaging are infarcts in the borderzone or watershed distributions.
This is typically from a large (ICA) or medium (MCA) stenosis or occlusion.
10/But it’s not just these infarcts that cause dementia. They are just a sign of the underlying disease.
If there is hypoperfusion, there isn’t just macro hypoperfusion, but also chronic neuronal hypoperfusion at a cellular level that causes damage, dysfunction & dementia
11/But we can’t see the damage on a cellular level. We can only see the macroscopic signs on imaging—borderzone infarcts.
Remember the major vascular territories are shaped like a butterfly—infarcts at the butterfly junction are borderzone. These indicate hypoperfusion
12/Next way to take someone down? A knock out punch. A one & done.
These are strategic infarcts.
These are infarcts located in structures directly related to cognition. So damage to these structures results in dementia without any other significant volume loss.
13/Now, rather than shooting a machine gun at a target, you a like a ninja. Just one shot right to the heart to take it down.
Just one infarct in one of these important structures can cause dementia like a shot to the heart.
So which structures are these?
14/There are many structures that have been implicated in strategic infarct dementia.
But the main ones are hippocampus, internal capsule (ant & genu), thalamus (paramedian) & caudate.
I remember this w/the mnemonic:
One HIT CAUses dementia
15/Next way to take someone down? Break important connections. Breaking a leg means they ain’t getting up.
Same w/infarcts, small vessel disease or subcortical vascular encephalopathy breaks important white matter connections between parts of the brain so they can’t function
16/These small vessel infarcts disrupt connections between the frontal lobe & deep gray & parietal lobe, resulting in decreased executive function, attention & memory.
The more small vessel disease, the more impact. So always comment on the severity of small vessel disease
17/The final way to take someone down? Play dirty & make them bleed—hemorrhagic infarcts.
These are a sign of both hypertensive & amyloid small vessel disease.
Amyloid angiopathy has a very strong correlation w/dementia
18/In fact, amyloid angiopathy has such a strong correlation w/dementia that some say it should be thought of more as a neurodegenerative disorder that occasionally causes hemorrhage/stroke—neurodegeneration is its day job.
19/It causes both neurodegeneration & stroke by build up of amyloid proteins in the vessel wall & surrounding perivascular space.
In the vessel wall, it causes weakening that can lead to rupture & hemorrhage
In the perivascular space, it causes clogging & decreased clearance
20/It’s like having a bathtub you never clean
Perivascular spaces get clogged like a drain leading to clouded water (dementia).
And stagnant water is bad for the pipes so they rust & burst—just like vessels hemorrhage
So always mention microhemorrhage/signs of amyloid
21/So now you know the important signs to look for when you are reading a study for vascular dementia.
You now can make all the findings so your report is a knock out!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you don’t know the time of stroke onset, are you able to deduce it from imaging?
Here’s a thread to help you date a stroke on MRI!
2/Strokes evolve, or grow old, the same way people evolve or grow old.
The appearance of stroke on imaging mirrors the life stages of a person—you just have to change days for a stroke into years for a person
So 15 day old stroke has features of a 15 year old person, etc.
3/Initially (less than 4-6 hrs), the only finding is restriction (brightness) on diffusion imaging (DWI).
You can remember this bc in the first few months, a baby does nothing but be swaddled or restricted. So early/newly born stroke is like a baby, only restricted
1/”I LOVE spinal cord syndromes!” is a phrase that has NEVER, EVER been said by anyone.
Do you become paralyzed when you see cord signal abnormality?
Never fear—here is a thread on all the incomplete spinal cord syndromes to get you moving again!
2/Spinal cord anatomy can be complex. On imaging, we can see the ant & post nerve roots. We can also see the gray & white matter. Hidden w/in the white matter, however, are numerous efferent & afferent tracts—enough to make your head spin.
3/Lucky for you, for the incomplete cord syndromes, all you need to know is gray matter & 3 main tracts. Anterolaterally, spinothalamic tract (pain & temp). Posteriorly, dorsal columns (vibration, proprioception, & light touch), & next to it, corticospinal tracts—providing motor
1/Do you get a Broca’s aphasia trying remember the location of Broca's area?
Does trying to remember inferior frontal gyrus anatomy leave you speechless?
Don't be at a loss for words when it comes to Broca's area
Here’s a 🧵to help you remember the anatomy of this key region!
2/Anatomy of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is best seen on the sagittal images, where it looks like the McDonald’s arches.
So, to find this area on MR, I open the sagittal images & scroll until I see the arches. When it comes to this method of finding the IFG, i’m lovin it.
3/Inferior frontal gyrus also looks like a sideways 3, if you prefer. This 3 is helpful bc the inferior frontal gyrus has 3 parts—called pars
1/Need help reading spine imaging? I’ve got your back!
It’s as easy as ABC!
A thread about an easy mnemonic you can use on every single spine study you see to increase your speed & make sure you never miss a thing!
2/A is for alignment
Look for: (1) Unstable injuries
(2) Malalignment that causes early degenerative change. Abnormal motion causes spinal elements to abnormally move against each other, like grinding teeth wears down teeth—this wears down the spine
3/B is for bones.
On CT, the most important thing to look for w/bones is fractures. You may see focal bony lesions, but you may not
On MR, it is the opposite—you can see marrow lesions easily but you may or may not see edema associated w/fractures if the fracture is subtle