A bit before his current cancellation ordeal and his apology, long after he wrote for Richard Spencer, back in May, Richard Hanania wrote “Ron Unz confronts the far right”. The object of the note, in retrospect, was likely for Richard to establish and solidify some amount of… https://t.co/qfY74sNTaAtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
What Richard posits is immigration’s critics—for reasons of lack of confidence in the moral posture of their arguments—are all attempting a rhetorical legerdemain, where what they don’t like is BLACK CRIME but what they feel is more respectful and prudent to talk about is MASS… https://t.co/bSbiZjZC2Mtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
But to do some figuring in my own words, pace Richard Hanania suggesting I would ever outsource to Bronze Age Pervert (never hire a Wallachian farmer to the job of a Brahmin dvija), I don’t assert utterly strict homogeneity is dispositive for success. That’s a consequence of… https://t.co/WLth3QLxaetwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Richard is often confused online about these simple observations, though perhaps it was all performative because he had some foreknowledge of the cancellation that was coming his way and wanted to buy some credibility.
Richard isn’t dumb—so besides course some performance which… https://t.co/xnOQPtlj8Ytwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Richard Spencer has made quite the transformation himself: where once the man whose Faustian spirit led national conversations on race, politics, and the destiny of a new Roman Empire with Elle Reeves, sometimes donning the Red of a Trump hat, today, the most 2014 fashwave… https://t.co/wSrtQdJfi7twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Spencer has become increasingly contemptuous and vocally opposed to what he sees as the compromising and pollutive association with people called‘wignats’ (that’s “‘wigger’ nationalists”) and the bankruptcy of conservatism in general.
These Twin Richards, Richard Spencer and Richard Hanania, both strike me as having grown up as sensitive young men with an intellectual verve and thirst for truth, and a profoundly unmastered sensitivity for justice, which—when they saw it violated by Liberal pieties which still… https://t.co/NZEVobYq8qtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
You can read the rest at
indianbronson. ꜱᴜʙꜱᴛᴀᴄᴋ .com
Anyway, here are some "Brahmin Hitler" results from MidJourney: https://t.co/ZHXpmtg8i1twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have you ever been in a hotel room, or maybe seen one one in media. Have you taken your time to ponder upon the layout of the furniture, their functions, historical reasoning and positioning? The bed is of course the essential part, but what else is there? Bedside tables... and..
...Cuck chairs. Now, before you dismiss this as a simple joke of the present - a mere passing of the online zeitgeist, I invite you to ponder - what is the true meaning of these additional furniture pieces?
The pyramid on the left doesn't exist - only nursing homes and graveyards could be shaped that way, but plenty of nations approximate it under ~40.
The one on the right *does* exist, from schools and campuses to whole societies.
For example, here is the population pyramid of Japan in 2010...vs 1940:
You can see the impact of wars in the Japanese male population in the earlier part of the their 20th ca. but they were still growing...in the 21st century, they get the downward taper: i.e. now they're dying
The idea of cultural “resilience” or “adaptivity” despite changing demographics is isomorphic to raising another person’s children, when one could have had one’s own. It’s true that the Lingua Anglica is spoken all over the world, but cold is the cuckoo’s comfort.
Cosmopolitan elites who work with their minds (if at all), often traveling far from home either physically or mentally, discount ideas of nationalism or attachments to land, because their own personal tastes and advantageous modes are xenophilic, abstruse, and diffuse.
But they are a distinct, usually unnecessary minority, there’s no reason they should be tolerated in their instigating, neglecting, or indulging the wars & hostilities, the suffering & deprivations, the inequities & arbitrages which make up their interactions with everyone else.
The main problem I have with them is it’s not even like gays or whatever where their sexual nature can, like regular people, just not be an issue because it doesn’t come up.
With these people it’s a visible thing and we’re asked to participate by playing along.
What if I said the way you HAD to address me, so I could feel safe and fully be my True Self ®, was with a Roman-style Nazi salute and calling me “Obergruppenführer”?
What would be the basis for refusing to do that?
What if I also said the only way for me to really being who I am without shame—was to be able to wear a snappy feldgrau Waffen SS uniform—and wear my preferred costume *anywhere* that I wanted?
To understand the secularized upper-caste anti-Hindu Liberal Anglophone elites who ran India pre-Modi, know that they want desperately to be the inheritors of White Boomers who were young in the 1960s and import that mindset into India.
I know most of my followers interested in politics aren’t especially so re: India, and that’s fine, but the contours of the American relationship to its elite/ruling class parallel those of Indians contra the nepotistic political party which controlled them for *70 years*.
Apart from entertainment media like that show, headlines from Anglophone *news* media are the US State reaction to the little brother types having lost—aimed at the young diaspora and the business class in India, to goad and chide them into working against Hindu Nationalism.
Notice that all of the parents bringing their children to these events are women, and generally college educated white liberal women. You don’t see: black moms, Asian parents, big Latino families, or white dads.
It’s always overwhelmingly white, college educated moms. Curious.
I think these homosexual black male performers are perceived by the white heterosexual women who are mothers as basically ridiculous creatures, something akin to a talking animal or elfin fairy, so their sexual gyrations are de-fanged and harmless, like a dog humping a chair.
The babies and very young kids don’t (consciously) pick up on much else, either. It’s obviously (to us) bad for them, but it’s not an immediate effect. It’s Mommy feeling good about herself/using the happy voice and colorful costumes. It’s cheap Disneyworld for them.