I have always felt that dressing well is about knowledge, not money. Tristan claims this suit costs $20k. That seems high to me, as a Savile Row suit typically costs ~$5k. But perhaps he went to the most expensive tailoring firm and choose the most expensive fabric. 🧵
My following comments are not a slight on his tailors, as they may be very skilled. But just a comment on the suit, which is a collaboration between the tailor and the client. Despite costing $20k, it doesn't fit very well.
First thing is the divot in the sleevehead. When guys see this, they often think it's because their shoulders are too big, so they size down. In fact, the case is often the opposite.
Here we see Gary Cooper wearing very exended shoulders. Yet, no divot!
A divot in the sleevehead is often a sign the coat is too narrow through the shoulders and upper back. So you want to size up. If you already own the garment, you may be able to fix this by letting out the center back seam.
Before & after shots from the blog Tutto Fatto a Mano:
The other problem is that the lapels buckle away from the chest and the buttoning point is already straining, creating drag lines around the waist. This again suggests the chest and waist are too small for the wearer.
The trousers are also very narrow. You can see how the side seam is already straining, as the front panel doesn't have enough room for the leg. The narrowness is causing the trouser leg to catch on the wearer's calves, causing ripples below the knee.
Compare this with King Felipe VI of Spain. His trousers always hang very cleanly. Both men are wearing trousers with a center crease, but only Felipe's trousers actually create that sharp uninterrupted line the crease is supposed to create.
The other thing that sticks out to me is the balance, which is a tailoring term for how the coat hangs from the shoulders. It looks like Tristan's coat has a short front balance, which means the front is shorter than the back. This makes the coat looks like it's riding up on him
Again, on King Felipe, we see how a coat should hang: front can be even with the back, or it can be slightly lower. But the front should never be shorter than the back.
Tristan likely has a short front balance bc he is barrel chested. Not enough cloth to cover the chest.
A lot of guys will naturally point out that Tristan has a very muscular build. And when you have that sort of build, you want to show it off. But there are other ways to create that flattering V-shaped figure and keep clean lines. Suit should not be pulling and wrinkling all over
A couple of weeks ago, two followers shared with me photos of themselves in their summer suits. The first person here is @MrSamWilkin; second person is @andrewdefrank
In this photo of @MrSamWilkin, he's standing on a bike, which makes it hard to assess the fit. But see: no shouler divot, lapels lay flat, not much pulling across waist (little here is caused by his pose), and trousers hang reasonably straight on his left leg (other is bent)
Same with this photo of @andrewdefrank. The coat isn't buttoned, so we can't see how the lapels and buttoning point look when the coat is fastened. But the sleeveehead and trousers are reasonably clean for what looks to be a linen suit.
What do you think were the cost of these garments? Certainly not $20k. But take a guess before going to the next tweet.
The first suit (@MrSamWilkin on a bike) is from Suitsupply. He paid 500 euros (~$550 given the current exchange rate). @andrewdefrank tells me that he doesn't remember what he paid, but it's from the esteemed tailoring house Jos A Bank (he bought it in 2018 as part of a sale)
Does this mean that you should rush to Suitsupply and Jos A Bank to buy these specific suits? No, as the cut may not work for you. Each person has their own uniquet set of fit challenges, which they have to identify and find solutions for.
But certainly, price is not nearly as important of a factor as many assume. A $500 suit can be better than a $20k suit. Goal should be to develop your eye, understand some basic tailoring principles, and find trustworthy tailors and clothiers who can help you get what you need.
Will leave you with this quote from First Lady Elanor Roosevelt, who summed up this sentiment neatly in her book It’s Up to the Women, published during the depths of the Great Depression:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
one of the things i love about bespoke tailoring is seeing how tailors solve technical fit issues. when you see stuff like this, it helps you spot issues in ready-to-wear
from the IG account dylanandson, a bespoke tailoring shop in singapore. they're great at making trousers.
as a customer, i think the main things to look for are:
1. clean drape all around, even in the back and around the seat (see how tan linen pants here are collapsing a little, where others are straight)
2. if your trousers have a center crease, the crease should fall in the center of your shoe, both the front and back. if the crease twists inward or outward, the cut is not right for you.
Since Edward Sexton's death last week, I've been reflecting a lot on his work. I doubt another tailor will leave as strong and distinct an impression on men's tailoring in my lifetime. For those unaware of him, I thought I'd share a bit about his story. 🧵
To understand Sexton, you have to know what Savile Row was like before the 1960s. This was a fairly conservative quarter. To become a client of the big houses, you had to be recommended. Firms shied away from press and had frosted glass windows to protect privacy of clients.
Sexton grew up in Elephant and Castle, a working-class neighborhood that gave him his Cockney accent. For his first job, he worked as a waiter at the Waldorf hotel, where he learned some people were enjoying nicer things than him. This was where he fell in love with bespoke suits
I will suggest something impractical and expensive, but couch it in a bit of cool menswear history, so this thread gains traction but ultimately proves to be useless for most people. Like most of my threads. 🧵
My suggestion is for a polo coat, which is a heavy, warm overcoat that polo players used to wear in the early 20th century. This coat was worn between chukkers (or "chukkas"), which is a period of play in a polo match.
Many of the original polo coats didn't have buttons. They were simply wrap-style coats with a belt tied around the waist. Remember that these were simply worn to keep the player warm between matches. The idea was that you could just throw one on.
People often answer this with "dress timeless," but I don't think that's really the answer. A lot of guys bought tweed sport coats and oxford shoes 15 years ago and are now in totally different clothes because those styles were ultimately not them. 🧵
When i think of "timeless" style, I don't think of one specific style. Lots of ppl have dressed the same for decades—Rick Owens, Daiki Suzuki, Bruce Boyer, Doug Bihlmaier, etc. All of these guys have very different styles, but they've found what works for them.
IMO, it's easier to arrive at this if:
1. You think of clothing as a cultural language. Think of what you're trying to say with your clothes. Don't just combine random stuff together.
2. Figure out what works for your lifestyle, personality, etc. Requires some soul searching
This is a good thread. I just want to clarify something. People often mistake my love for classic tailored clothing as a belief that either everyone should dress this way or that this is the only legitimate aesthetic. This puts things into a false dichotomy. 🧵
As my Twitter account has grown, I've leaned more into classic tailoring bc this is something everyone understands. But my interest spans everything from niche Japanese workwear to Lemaire to techwear and some avant-garde. I've written about these aesthetics on my site
A way to get around this false dichotomy between "principles" and "laws" is to not think of dress as kind of science, like physics, or even pure artistic expression. Instead, think of it as cultural language.