discussion on the Railway Troops, they have become even more important.
On the logistics side, we have several strategic railways and rail hubs near the front (for both sides). They cannot be safely used by regular rail service. RU railway troops have an advantage in being able
to use this force, without drawing on other forces less suited for the job, to patrol these railways, not only against sabotage but also routinely repairing them due to enemy strikes, and clearing them of remotely delivered mines.
The Railway Troops can organize smaller armed
convoys that can deliver men and supplies to and from positions much closer to the front than a regular state owned civilian train service can or is willing to.
The Railway Troops are also less dependent on pre-existing civilian railway stations and can load and unload at ad hoc
points on the line. To the extent Russia can efficiently use this service, it provides a large advantage over its opponent who lacks these capabilities, and has an interior even more subject to bombardment by its opponent.
The necessity of war has improved Ukraine's infamously
inefficient, corrupt and decaying state owned railroad company Ukrainian Railways by huge factors.
While in peacetime it barely could operate, during the war it evacuated millions of people west, carries western weapons east to the front, and transports significant part of grain
formerly exported through the Black Sea. All of this while continuing passenger service (of course not everywhere), and while receiving heavy Russian blows.
While its continued operation is critical, and its achievements have been impressive, it remains dangerously close to
collapse due to Russian strikes, is reliant on incoming locomotives, railcars and parts provided (& ultimately donated) by the west, and does not have the capabilities nor fighting ethos, that the Russian Railway forces count on.
Even now, we hear of UA SBU arrests of
UA Railways (Ukrzaliznytsia) officials due to ongoing corruption.
With this in mind, regarding logistics, the railway defense, repair, maintenance and operation capabilities of the combatants is critical for their war effort.
The battle for the Black Sea and Crimea, which
we have discussed at length elsewhere, in large part hinges on the rail (and to a lesser extend road) connections between Crimea and the mainland. Ukraine has recently stepped up its attempts at destroying these connections in order
to achieve in Crimea what it did in the western
bank of Kherson. A much bigger and more difficult task of course.
Besides the critical logistics aspect, railways now have a clear additional strategic and tactical component in the conflict.
As we discussed earlier, the parties
now understand (or at least Russia does) that the dynamics between the current set of weaponry and capabilities and the terrain have in some ways changed previous assumptions.
(article here: )
defensive lines, when approached perpendicularly, and paths of advance when followed.
Using the @DefensePolitics map, here we see the Russian held railway south of Bakhmut serving as a difficult line for the UA forces to cross (as previously was the canal).
And just north of
the city, we can see areas where Russia can (and recently is) using the railways as paths of advance, especially towards Vyimka in the last few days.
Not that this is an easy advance, as the defender hides in the same forest lines, but that it is now often easier than advancing
along open fields without cover. The forest belts, forest lines, and in many cases the ground cover (height) the railway line offers offer some cover and stealth to the assaulting forces as well. Here and elsewhere such is the Kupyansk front, we will see the railway lines being
used in one way, the other or both. They can be very strong defensive lines, and/or paths of attack. Russia here is approaching a strategic line, either to simply gain fire control over it and cut off Kyslivka, to seize it, advance along it, or as a general faint to draw forces
away from its more important aim west of the Oskil river (around Dvorichna) to get behind (north and west) of Kupyansk. It is in that city that the main railway and road lanes connect, strategic for a huge swath of of the Kharkhov front.
The Russian Railway Troops, emblematic of an imperial Tsarist past, have a critical role to play in the guided munition and drone saturated battles on the Eurasian steppe in 2023.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I will be updating shortly on the ongoing Ukrainian offensive.
Recently it has involved courageous (if not terribly intelligent) assaults against Russian lines around Zaporizhzhia ending like this.
These BMPS carry squads (6-10 troops) to the combat line, what we see in this… https://t.co/hQ2KuGReIMtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Update:
More complete footage released from this attack. UA forces are attempting to outflank Robotyne from the east and even southeast (this is ongoing today in new attacks).
Seeing this larger picture we can see that this was reinforced brigade if not a divisional sized
attack. The final BMP destruction occurs here (@DefensePolitics map). The attempt at flanking the town is being attempted by narrow thrusts which his further narrowing the gray zone salient the UA forces have achieved between entrenched positions.
It is either an intentional or
difficult. Who would believe in the guarantees? As we have discussed before, Prigozhin is a private citizen who resides in Russia, under its jurisdiction and whose family and assets are mostly under its jurisdiction as well.
The answer to this (which I did not foresee) was
Belarus' Lukashenko. Ruling his own independently country, he could provide the safe heaven Prigozhin needs, at least until things calm down.
In my earlier post I did not even consider the mainstream reporting which was as pathetic as usual. At first, they believed that a 25k
The important outcome here, which connects to the ongoing #Ukrainiancounteroffensive (or at least its theoretical plan) is the potential reversal in water levels and river width.
The drop in water levels of Lake Kakhovka is really striking. It has in many places been reduced to
a mud flat. Here we can see how dramatic the before and after is in certain places of the Lake. Again, here we face a Russian front that is not well manned nor heavily fortified due tot he wide obstacle of the lake. Downstream of the dam, we already saw we have the opposite
collapse, the river was narrow downstream of the dam, and Russian forces contended with crossing attempts by UA forces on a daily basis. They had occupied the middle islands, and with a powerful base of Kherson city itself right up to the bank, made a powerful force projection
across the bank. RU had to maintain relatively strong forces in this area. Above the dam, the river was much wider (Lake Kakhovka) and Russia thus maintained lesser positions. A look at a very rough deployment map (militaryland) shows us what I mean.
Police Sergeant Bradley T. McClure committing an unlawful arrest and subverting the US constitution on film. He can do that because he did against a white man who was expressing conservative and/or Christian beliefs.
If it wasn't on video, the small sergeant's actions would go
unnoticed and be successful. Because it is on video, (full version for those interested: ), then if enough citizens in America still care about their freedom and the rule of law, then perhaps it won't be.
Anyone who watches the full video will clearly see
that the officer lied in his Affidavit of Probable Cause.
Note that the "proud" Americans expressing opposing viewpoints (reportedly out-of-towners as is often the case) cheer at the illegal arrest of a fellow American who disagrees with them. Liberty and the health of the
Big news, massive flooding along the Dnieper in the Kherson region. Kakhovskaya HPP is severely damaged. We have discussed the strategic importance of the water level previously. Together with the much anticipated UA counteroffensive we now have this development. Some of the
earliest footage was from daybreak today. The flooding started in early dawn. Goes without saying that the mainstream media and the EU quickly blamed Russia for intentionally blowing up the damn (and called it a war crime). That the dam is Russian controlled, and that the
southern (Russian-held) bank is lower than the northern (UA-held) bank and so will suffer worse flooding does not enter in their calculations. Neither does the repeated UA strikes against the damn (which helped convince RU forces to withdraw from Kherson) in the past. Russia