Sean T at RCP is a free elf Profile picture
Aug 9 14 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Today is my son Judson's 16th Birthday. Sixteen years ago, I thought about how on today we'd drive together to the DMV, get his driver's license, and how proud I'd be of him for passing, and frankly myself for teaching him how to drive, the way my Dad taught me and his him. 1/
That's not how today is going. Judd was diagnosed with autism at age 2.5. At the time, his doctor said he just had a "touch" of autism. I viewed it as a roadbump. To the extent I'm smart, it isn't in a traditional way, it's in a "think way outside the box" way. 2/
(today I recognize that ability to make weird connections no one else does as my own form of autism-ish behavior, which I've been able to redirect in a positive way, but anyway). I knew I could fix this, the way I'd been able to fix almost every other problem I'd encountered. 3/
At my wife's prodding, we got Judd involved in a special school, and he was the first kid to meet all his IEP goals. Everything was back on track! He'd be one of those kids that was maybe a little bit off, but would be fine. We'd fixed something else. 4/
But, as it turned out, Judd has other generalized cognitive impairments. The learning curve gradually began to bend, and then plateaued out. Judd has some speech, is potty trained, eats well, has activities, but it isn't just a "touch" of autism that he has. 5/
Anyway, part of this is that I'm feeling wistful on his 16th birthday. But part of it is that I know there are people out there reading this who just got a diagnosis and are feeling a bit lost and fearful. 6/
And it's useful to know this: If you'd told me on December 2, 2009 that Judd wasn't going to be able to get his driver's license on Aug. 9, 2023, I'd have been utterly devastated. In fact, I have spent a fair amount of time in a state of anxiety about that fact, among others. 7/
But here's the thing: On Aug. 9, 2023, I'm a bit sad, but I'm also okay with it. Some of that is coming to terms with reality, but some of it is that Judd is an awesome kid in so many other ways. 8/
So for you other parents out there in the same boat: It's okay to mourn the dream you had that didn't come to pass. Let me say that again, because it's important: It Is Okay to Mourn the Dream You Had that Didn't Come to Pass. 9/
But just understand that that was *your* dream. Judd is a happy teenage kid who, as far as I can tell, couldn't care less about driving. He's spending his 16th Birthday with a beloved aide. He'll play ipad then go swimming, then get a special dinner that he loves. 10/
Part of truly accepting special needs kids is learning to accept them on their own terms. Just like other kids (and adults!) it's ok to push them to branch out and try new things, but they're ultimately just people with diverse goals, dreams, and interests. 11/
As for Judd, well, we still push him. Yesterday he got to go to his first rock concert. He was a little apprehensive, but loved it, especially when the hot dogs showed up. 12/ Image
So happy birthday to my favorite 16 year old on the planet. You make your Dad proud every day, and I've learned more from you than you could ever hope to learn from me. 13/13
And I should add that, to the extent Judd was "fixed," it was because of my wife and not me (the t-shirt was her creation), who somehow managed to constantly push for more opportunities for Judd without getting sucked into the vortex of desperate experimentation that snags some.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean T at RCP is a free elf

Sean T at RCP is a free elf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanTrende

Jun 10
I continue to hold to the position that we should not prosecute former presidents or candidates for the presidency except in extreme circumstances. I thought the NY indictment fell far short of that threshold. This one is different.
Basically, it is true the president shouldn't be above the law. If Trump had actually shot someone on Fifth Avenue, yes, he should have been prosecuted. If they had found hookers buried in the basement of Trump Tower -- which would not have surprised me -- indict.
At the same time, prosecutors exercise considerable discretion in which crimes to pursue and to not pursue. And if there are people who wouldn't be prosecuted for the crime the President/candidates should more-or-less automatically be in that bin.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 9
So I think people are being a bit cavalier in the takes on the AL decision being Roberts and Kavanaugh afraid of running afoul of public opinion with the VRA. Justices really do cast sincere votes from time-to-time, and this case wasn't as cut-and-dried as some thought. 1/
In particular, the notion that stare decisis is much stronger in statutory cases than constitutional ones is real, and long-standing. Where there isn't a central constitutional argument, it isn't surprising that these justices might look askance at modifying Gingles. 2/
In particular, note that Justice Kavanaugh, in his concurring opinion, states "hey, if you make an argument that the effects test is flat-out constitutional, and frame it the same way that Shelby County was (things have changed in the South) I am all ears." 3/
Read 10 tweets
May 16
I went ahead and clicked on one of those "AI generated these iconic movie stars from descriptions" things from Facebook, and some of them aren't so bad. Lara Croft has an eye infection, but otherwise is believable. Others, however . . . Image
I might even identify "AI Wednesday" without being told who it is! But . . . Image
Elle Woods apparently can't afford a dentist (a common problem I find in AI generated people for some reason) Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 17, 2022
Now that the ballots are mostly counted, my take on what happened
realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/…
I think it's important to realize that, in a system based on districts that elect one member, votes don't always translate directly to seats for a party. In fact, there are years where the relationship of votes and seats is outright inverted (1976, 1988, 1998, 2004).
Based on where it looks like Rs will land in the popular vote, you'd expect them to gain about 20-25 seats. I think this that this is what most analysts would have predicted if told the GOP would win the popular vote by 3-4 points. It just doesn't always work out that way.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 10, 2022
On the uncontested House races, it is obviously proper to try to estimate vote totals for those seats. It's weird that people are suddenly super keyed in on this known-for-decades-but-always-ignore-issue, but whatevs. There are 10R uncontested and 2D. BUT . . . 1/
there are also 6 races in CA where Rs didn't make the runoff. This meant that you get vote totals out of here for 12 D candidates and no R candidates. Finally, of those 10R races, 2 of the states (FL and LA) count no votes at all, meaning it actually hurts R vote totals. 2/
I suspect that when you add this all together it probably makes some difference, especially given differential turnout in R/D districts, but in the context of a 100M vote election I suspect it is close to a wash this time. 3/3
Read 7 tweets
Nov 10, 2022
One of the quiet stories under the hood is that Republicans are looking like they'll win the popular vote. Probably a popular vote swing of 5% (depending on how CA votes work out), swinging about 2% of the chamber. IOW, the generic polls are likely to be about spot on. Why? 1/
An easy story is uncontested seats; there were about 8 more GOP uncontested than Democrats. But in some of those, they don't count any votes, so it net hurts the GOP. And there are seats where two Democrats ran against each other, so Ds double dip. 2/
CA has a lot of votes left to count, but I'm building that into my estimate. Rs are up six in the generic ballot right now; a 5 point swing would have them win by two. CA had a gap of 4 million in the popular vote, and it looks like about half the ballots are counted already. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(