Finkelstein and Stern-Weiner are both Jewish, although their analysis would be correct even if they weren’t.
It’s no more ‘antisemitic’ for Jewish people to report facts about prejudice and privilege than it is for me or anyone else.
Racism isn’t about subjective feelings or one’s ‘standpoint’ conferred by social location. It’s about the material reality of violence and discrimination which is susceptible to empirical verification or falsification.
Here’s some data on the alleged anti-Jewish epidemic:
But the best evidence is in social science studies. A 2010 report from the National Equality Panel provided data on hourly wages broken down by gender and religion:
The data is very clear on pay gaps between Jewish and Muslim men, and on predicted pay, as these tables show:
In case you are thinking that the reasons Jewish people do so well (as a whole) is because they are so ‘clever’, ‘bright’ or ‘intelligent’, or – in a slightly less racist formulation – more ‘educated’, the EHRC data appears not to support that view.
Do Jews face institutional racism from the state, the police, the counter-terrorism apparatus? Are they racially profiled? Are they regularly (or ever) stopped under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act?
To ask the question is to answer it. Jews face no such threats. Muslims do.
Are Jewish people returning to Britain from occupied Palestine – after being radicalised into joining the Israel Occupation Forces and terrorising Palestinians – routinely detained by counter-terrorism forces? No.
Should they be? Absolutely.
Jews as a whole – on every metric examined above – are not discriminated against. Jews are the most privileged minority group. They’re over-represented in all areas of British public life. With that privilege comes the power to make economic, political and cultural decisions.
On Palestine, this translates into power to colonise through donations from British Jews to Zionist organisations that are stealing Palestinian land.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Zionist propagandists like Hen Mazzig rely on 'standpoint theory' to fool naïve liberals and leftists into buying their lies.
They say only Jews can define Judeophobia, based on their 'lived experience'.
This is a denial of reality.
Standpoint theory relies on the bizarre notion that people are magically qualified to speak about things via accident of birth, rather than observing material realities.
Real anti-racism is rooted in looking at the facts.
🗣️📢
Is the Chabad-Lubavitch sect 'extremist'? Or, did I toss ‘disgraceful slurs’ its way, as the Community Security Trust and the Jewish News claim?
🧵
According to the Jewish News I claimed that ‘Russian Chabadniks in 1777 were the original Zionist settlers.’ I did not. As is widely known the Zionist movement originated in the 1880s. One would expect Zionist hacks to know their own history a little better, but no matter.
In fact in 1777 Chabad was 'anti-Zionist', in that it believed in Jewish settlement not a 'Jewish state'. Still - in Hebron in 1929 - Chabadniks allowed the Haganah to store weapons in their buildings. Later, some joined the extreme Stern and Irgun Zionist terror gangs.
There seems to be some confusion about who the occupation for Palestine began. Jonathan @Freedland appears to believe it started in 1967. But it didn't.
Did the occupation begin in 1909? That was when the first ‘Kibbutz’ was created in Umm Juni, by Arthur Ruppin, the head of the Zionist Organization office in Palestine. He was a devotee of ‘racial purity’ who was sympathetic to Nazi racial thinking.
1. 📢Thread 📢A special issue of Contemporary Social Science on ‘Knowing Terrorism’ is almost ready for publication. Ed by @Narzanin@ta_mills and @Tracking_power, it addresses ‘the ethical and methodological issues raised by researching "terrorism"' bit.ly/2lATJjf
1. 📢Thread 📢How the CST made false allegations about one of my lectures based on faulty analysis and jumping to (inaccurate) conclusions. bit.ly/2kJf2i4
2. The CST claim this slide showed ‘mainstream UK Jewish orgs & individuals in a network under "Israel government". In context of a lecture about Islamophobia this echoes conspiracy & dual loyalty tropes’
3. There are several false claims in this statement. First, the slide showed a pro-Israel group BICOM in the context of the ‘British Zionist scene’
📢Thread 📢The Sunday Telegraph has published a hit piece on me by @camillahmturner and @ImogenHorton98
Let's review the inaccuracies and weasel words used to insinuate antisemitism even while explicitly denying they are making such an allegation. bit.ly/2kskIwY
@camillahmturner@ImogenHorton98 2. The key element of the story is that two Jewish students allegedly felt ‘uncomfortable and intimidated’ following a lecture I gave on Islamophobia.
@camillahmturner@ImogenHorton98 3. In my response (which the Telegraph reported) I said that ‘Students of all backgrounds can find some of the material challenging if it goes against their existing beliefs or knowledge-base.’