The House GOP has been riling up its base by repeatedly insisting it has the goods to get Joe Biden.
This works fine in the short term, but repeatedly overpromising and underdelivering is only going to make the base mad at them, more than anyone else.
You can see this with today's tweets from the Oversight Committee.
It's framed as a huge hit on Biden but once you read it, it's clear the "Biden FAMILY AND ASSOCIATES" framing is a load-bearing beam.
It's a showy announcement meant to suggest much more than is actually there.
But the base doesn't get that -- they're riled up and they expect action.
Action that Republican politicians can't *actually* deliver because they (or at least their very patient legal counsel) understand there's really no there there.
So there are lots of QTs and replies on their tweets, demanding "so what are you going to do?!?"
And the answer is, well, nothing.
If they impeach, this nothingburger becomes obvious.
If they sit on it, hoping rumors hurt Biden, the base will be furious at their inaction.
Doesn't seem like the smartest plan to me.
But then again, trusting a pair of clowns like Jim Jordan and James Comer to lead congressional investigations didn't either.
Any discussion of Florida's effort to replace the original AP standards for African American history with the state's own version should directly compare and contrast the two.
One thing is readily apparent from even a quick comparison between the two standards -- the claims that Florida's standards are "robust" quickly fall apart when you line them up next to the much more substantial program the AP has put together with specific sources and plans.
A lot of attention has been given to the slavery section -- which in Florida is strongly focused on discussing abolitionism while the AP standards are much more direct on the lived experiences for the enslaved -- but for me the 20th century material is more of an issue.
Among those who “alleged” Nixon sought to woo southern racists were Republican strategists like Kevin Phillips and Lee Atwater, and RNC Chairmen like Ken Mehlman and Michael Steele who apologized for it.
Here’s Kevin Phillips in 1970 talking on the record to the NYT about how Republicans would win over the “Negrophobe” southern whites who voted for Wallace in 1968. (They did!)
This whole thread shows how people who don't understand this history can get things wildly wrong.
The Democratic senators he references here were all longtime conservative segregationists. Their elections *confirm* the charges against Nixon instead of refute them.
Arkansas Democrat John McClellan: signer of the Southern Manifesto who attacked Eisenhower for sending troops to Little Rock and called the Civil Rights Act of 1964 the "Discrimination Act of 1964."
In 1972, the American Conservative Union gave him an 80% conservative rating.
Mississippi Democrat James Eastland: one of *the* most prominent segregationists in the Senate, the powerful Judiciary Committee chairman said he had a special coat with pockets to bury civil rights bills.
Look, all @johnthune wants is to wait until there’s a week without a mass shooting here and *as soon as that happens* he’s totally willing to talk about gun reform.
Let me just look at the list of mass shootings this year and maybe I can find a window for @johnthune …
Oh wow. Huh.
Uh, listen, @johnthune, I’ve scrolled through this site for a while and it looks like these shootings actually happen all the time? And might be getting worse?