Billionaire investor Dan Loeb believes studying this one company is worth more than a 2-year MBA.
Surprisingly, it isn’t Amazon, Apple, or Berkshire Hathaway.
As one of the all-time best-performing stocks, it’s delivered 4,500%+ returns over the last 25 years.
Let’s dive in!
The company is Danaher and the secret to its success is the Danaher Business System (DBS).
In this thread, I’ll give you an overview of Danaher, DBS, and their M&A strategy.
Let’s start with Danaher’s history! $DHR
In 1980, brothers Steven and Mitchell Rales founded Equity Group Holdings to acquire undervalued industrial businesses.
They used junk bonds to acquire Mohawk Rubber Company and Master Shield, manufacturers of tires and vinyl goods.
The Rales brothers acquired a real estate investment trust (REIT) called DMG, Inc. in 1983 for its $130 million tax-loss carryforwards.
They then transferred Master Shield & Mohawk Rubber Company into the REIT to help shelter their profits using the tax credits.
In 1984, they renamed the company after a river in Montana - Danaher was born! The Celtic root “Dana” means “swift flowing.”
By 1986, Danaher had made 12 more acquisitions using debt. It ended up on the Fortune 500 in just 6 years with $456 million in revenues. Talk about swift!
Around 1988, the Rales brothers saw early warning signs that the junk bond market was going to crash.
They made 3 important changes that set the stage for Danaher as we know it today: 1. Shifted focus to improving operations (DBS) 2. Reduced debt 3. Moved to Chairman role
Danaher’s subsidiary Jacobs Vehicle Systems had been facing quality challenges. To learn from the best in lean manufacturing, their manager went to Japan to shadow Toyota Motor Corporation.
When the manager came back and applied his learnings, the results were outstanding!
Danaher applied these lessons to the rest of their businesses, making them one of the first U.S. companies to adopt lean manufacturing.
And so, Danaher Business Systems was born!
Around this time, the Rales brothers also moved to a chairman role, bringing in George Sherman from Black & Decker as CEO.
Sherman was an engineer who also had an MBA. He was credited with turning around the B&D Power Tools business and helping it grow at 2x the market rate.
Sherman changed Danaher’s acquisition strategy in 2 important ways:
1. Transition to less cyclical, higher organic growth industries
2. Platform M&A strategy: “Making fewer but larger acquisitions… firms with respectable market shares that were underperforming financially”
The new M&A strategy was to focus on: 1. Large, fragmented markets growing without cyclicality or volatility 2. Niche firms they could acquire for products without their overhead 3. Improvement opportunity via DBS
Simply, “we look for markets of size where we can win”
Danaher improved its M&A strategy under Sherman. The strategy was to start with a large platform acquisition when entering a new market.
This could then serve as a center of gravity as they made smaller, bolt-on acquisitions to leverage their economies of scale in distribution.
These small tweaks have led to vastly better outcomes over time. At the heart of Danaher has been the Japanese philosophy of kaizen, or continuous improvement.
And over the last several decades, Danaher has only gotten stronger and better. It’s now doing $30+ billion in revenues
The amazing thing is that the Danaher of today looks very different from its start in the industrial sector.
Danaher today is focused solely on Biotech, Life Sciences, and Diagnostics. (They are spinning off their Environmental & Applied Solutions / EAS businesses)
Danaher has meaningfully improved its business quality from a debt-heavy, cyclical industrial company to a more predictable science and technology company.
80%+ of revenues are now recurring thanks to a largely razor/razor-blade business model.
Danaher has also significantly improved its growth prospects, as these science & technology end-markets benefit from secular growth.
For example, these industries are set to benefit from the shift toward biologics, cell and gene therapies, and molecular diagnostics.
Along the way, Danaher has refined its M&A strategy. They focus on markets with secular growth + companies with strong market positions + attractive valuations.
They have also evolved the Danaher Business System. DBS now includes not only cost-focused/lean manufacturing tools but also growth and leadership tools.
DBS has turned into a powerful, competitive advantage that allows Danaher to meaningfully improve the operations of the businesses it acquires.
Overall, Danaher is set up well to continue to deliver top-quartile performance through a combination of:
1 Operating in attractive industries 2. Strategic M&A 3. Danaher Business Systems
Danaher benefits from attractive industry growth. It uses DBS to lower costs and reinvests savings into R&D + S&M to grow.
Cash flow is deployed to acquire undervalued businesses that can be improved with DBS. Rinse & repeat!
Organic execution + M&A = compounding returns
Danaher has outperformed the S&P 500 by 4,100% over the past 25 years!
The Rales brothers have built a remarkable business with Danaher and own a combined ~$20 billion stake in the company.
There is so much more to learn from Danaher!
If folks liked this thread, for my next one I’ll do a deep dive on Danaher Business Systems and the key tools that they use to improve their businesses.
So if you found this thread helpful, it would mean a lot if you could like and repost the first tweet.
I tweet about investing and entrepreneurship, so follow me for more @skhetpal
Julian Robertson started Tiger Fund at 48 with $8.8M and built it into a $21B fund over 18 years.
Tiger generated 31.7% annualized returns vs. S&P 500's 12.7%.
Julian also built the best investing talent factory and pioneered the modern hedge fund industry.
Let’s dive in!
Born in North Carolina, Julian was a Navy officer turned stockbroker at Kidder Peabody. By 1974 he ran their asset management division, but felt constrained.
He took his family to New Zealand for a year to write a book, hated the solitary life, and returned with a new mission.
Julian launched Tiger in 1980, which was great timing due to low valuations and declining rates after the brutal 1970s.
His philosophy was simple: buy the best businesses & short the worst. But execution required building an army of competitive analysts.
Warren Buffett earned his legendary status in the partnership years of the '50s and '60s when he compounded at 23.8% annually vs. the Dow's 7.4% by investing in under-the-radar companies.
Brett Gardner's “Buffett's Early Investments” tells us how he did it.
Let's dive in!
Buffett didn't just flip Moody’s Manuals and scoop up crazy bargains. Obvious quantitative bargains often had issues or were so thinly traded that Buffett had to put out ads to find sellers.
It has always been difficult to outperform the market, especially to Buffett's extent.
4 reasons for Buffett’s outperformance:
1. Activism (e.g. taking control of Dempster Mill & changing capital allocation)
2. Concentration (Amex was a 40% position)
3. Creative Research Process (e.g. counted railcars to estimate demand)
The biggest myth about market crashes? That they bottom when the economy improves.
LT3000 wrote a great article explaining the psychology of market bottoms and why markets always seem to recover "too early" and catch most investors off guard.
A thread on the 4 key takeaways:
1. Unknown unknowns drive crashes, not known risks
COVID, 9/11, the GFC. Each time, people say "this time really is different"
Market crashes happen when there's no clear past example to follow. In hindsight, it all seems obvious, but investors back then didn’t have clarity.
When something truly unexpected hits, everyone simultaneously increases cash positions, for example from 5% to 20%, to "preserve capital" and "prepare for future opportunities."
This collective derisking causes markets to crash often before actual economic damage.
Microsoft tried to buy Intuit for $1.5B in 1994. When rejected, Gates vowed to crush them.
30 years later, $INTU is worth $170B while Microsoft Money is dead.
Here's how a small tax software startup outmaneuvered the tech giant and built a financial software empire:
In 1983, Intuit was founded by Scott Cook and Tom Proulx, driven by their vision to create a personal finance program to simplify money management
Their first product Quicken beat 46 competitors through its simplicity and was the best-selling consumer software product by 1988
INTU’s early success led Microsoft to make a $1.5B acquisition offer in 1994 but it was blocked by the DOJ.
This led MSFT to invest significantly in its own Microsoft Money product, but ultimately shut it down in 2009, noting INTU had won due to its superior consumer marketing.
Wayne Huizenga is one of the most prolific and successful entrepreneurs in US history.
He was the first person to ever build three Fortune 500 companies: Waste Management, Blockbuster, and AutoNation, despite never graduating college.
Let’s dive into how he did it!
Wayne dropped out of college after 3 semesters and spent a brief stint in the military before joining a garbage collection service like his successful grandfather.
After getting a handle on the business, he borrowed $5,000 from his father-in-law to buy a truck and some clients.
He spent 2 AM till noon collecting trash and the rest soliciting new business. Over the next 7 years, he grew his business to 40 trucks and $3M in revenue.
Itching for faster growth, he merged with his grandfather’s company, run by Dean Buntrock, to form Waste Management.