First, knitwear should always be folded, never hung, bc the garment can stretch out.
Storage tip: During the off-season, store sweaters in rigid Tupperware bins. Slip a cotton sheet or pillowcase over the top, then snap the lid down. This keeps out bugs that eat wool fibers.
Second, if you're hanging casualwear (e.g., button-up shirts, casual jackets), then you can use any old hanger. Although I prefer wooden hangers over thin wire ones, such as the ones you get from your dry cleaner. Ikea sells packs of 8 for about $9.
The exception is heavy leather jackets, like those made from horsehide or cowhide. I think these are still mostly fine on the hangers above, but hardcore enthusiasts—particularly those who collect expensive vintage pieces—feel differently. These fall into the next category.
When it comes to wardrobe storage, the major exception is high-end tailoring. These require special hangers. The reason is bc suit jackets and sport coats are not made like any other type of garment.
They are built up from many layers of material—haircloth, canvas, and padding—which are carefully sewn together using pad stitching, and then specially ironed to create shape. This type of ironing is not like how you iron a shirt; it's pressing *shape* into the garment.
When you look at a beautifully made, tailored jacket, it has a certain 3D shape. Notice how the chest here is rounded. The sleeves have a conical shape that hovers around the arm. There are no wrinkles, dents, puckers, or pulling. This is a result of tailoring + pressing.
If you store these on the thin wooden hangers I mentioned above, you can permanently ruin the jacket over time. The shoulder line can get distorted. If the hanger is not sized right for the garment, the ends can push out the sleeves, ruining the clean, conical shaping.
If the hanger's neck isn't right for the jacket, it can stretch out the collar. The jacket's collar is the part that touches the back of your neck. A tailor will carefully shape this area so it always sits on your neck. See the gaping here? This can become permanent by stretching
What you want is a hanger that will preserve the garment's shape. That means a few things:
1. Correctly sized so the ends don't push out the sleeves 2. Flared ends to support the shoulder 3. Hanger curves to mimic your body 4. Rounded neck to support jacket's collar
In this way, the jacket is fully supported, and the shaping will be preserved. (Note, you will still need to get your garments hand pressed from time to time.) Compare this photo to the one above. See how it keeps its 3D shape.
(Photos from the wonderful blog Tutto Fatto a Mano)
The downsides? For one, they are annoyingly expensive. The Hanger Project sells nice hangers, but they cost about $30. Secondly, when you have hangers that curve forward and have flared-out shoulders, you can't store as much in your closet. This presents a space issue.
The above is the Gold Standard for storing high-end tailoring. Everyone will have to make their own cost/ benefit calculations. If you have a walk-in closet with a ton of space and bespoke suits from the finest tailors, I recommend buying hangers from The Hanger Project.
If you have less space and/ or if you have jackets that aren't made in the same way, then you might want to consider some other solution. Some suits and sport coats may not have that shaping that comes from hand-tailoring and pressing.
In such cases, I recommend Wooden Hangers USA. Their hangers are not as great as The Hanger Project's. The shoulders are not curved; the neck is square (won't support the collar). But they have flared ends and cost about $6. They're also good for heavy leather jackets.
So, in short, how you should store your garments depends on what you're storing and how they were made. Knowing the Gold Standard can help you make some cost/ benefit calculations so you figure out what works for you.
Someone pointed out that Ikea also sells flared hangers. They don't look as curved as The Hanger Project's, and they still have a square neck. But they're cheaper than Wooden Hanger USA and might be easier to acquire.
Not true. I'll give you some examples of when styles crossed over from womenswear to menswear, and how men have worn straight-up womenswear or just feminine styles in cool ways. 🧵
We should first recognize that gender codes are socially constructed. Clothing is not inherently masculine or feminine—codes are contextual and can change over time. Aristocratic men once wore bright red heels. Then they became womenswear until that notion was challenged again.
Plenty of things started on the womenswear side of the aisle before crossing over into men's. Prior to the 20th century, men carried pocket watches and only women wore wristwatches. The humble t-shirt began as the top of union suits, which was once considered women's underwear.
During the early 20th century, when labor was more divided by gender, the US Dept. of Agriculture organized youth clubs orientated around developing certain skills. Chief among them were clothing clubs, which taught young girls how to cut, mend, and sew clothing.
In her book The Lost Art of Dress, historian Linda Przybyszewski estimates that more than 324,000 girls participated in clothing clubs (cooking clubs were a distant second with half as many members). The US gov also funded home economics education, which taught similar skills.
I don't know anything about womenswear, but I've noticed that women's tailoring is typically free of the problems I commonly see on men. I had dinner with a bespoke tailor last night who explained why this may be so. A thread for those interested. 🧵
Disclosure: I don't know how the patterns were drafted for the clothes featured in this thread. That would make a big difference in how they should be judged. But for the purpose of this thread, I'll assume they're ready-to-wear or designer (i.e., adjusted off a block pattern).
One thing I notice is that women's tailoring typically features a high armhole. For instance, at last year's DNC, every politician who made a speech raised their hand at some point. On men, this typically resulted in their jacket lifting. But not so on women.
First, some basics. It's easier to dress like this if you involve some kind of activity. I suggest going out to a nice restaurant or bar. Or going to a party or an evening show. You can also dress like this just to have fun in the city (e.g., going to the museum).
Another thing: there are elements in this outfit that may be harder to pull off, such as the hair-on-hide coat. Can you try? Yes, of course, but it's more of a statement piece. Needs the right haircut/ personal vibe.
It's interesting to see how gender in aesthetics is constantly a moving target. Will explain how four outfits from today's Todd Snyder FW25 show were once considered very masculine, but now may not because men perform disinterest in clothes. 🧵
The first is straightforward: single-breasted, notch lapel suit made from grey herringbone tweed. My guess is that this model is wearing a size up for styling purposes (gives him some swagger). The cut you'll try in-store will probably be a little slimmer.
Of course, tweed is that prickly woolen that British men once wore while playing sport in the countryside. It used to be that men's wardrobes were strictly divided between town (London) and country, but such rules broke down over time. Hence the phrase "tweed in the city."
Before Europeans landed in North America, the Pacific Northwest was populated by the Coast Salish people, who had been here for thousands of years. During the 19th century, many made a living by selling woven blankets to traders. The blankets typically featured geometric designs.
Business dried up in the late 19th century as the market was flooded with Hudson Bay Point blankets, so Coast Salish people picked up knitting needles. This was the birth of the Cowichan sweater, which combined old Coast Salish weaving practices with European knitting techniques.