Post

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
Click again on or Share Via icon
Click on Copy Link to Tweet
Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
More info at Twitter Help

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Aug 15, 2023 • 12 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

THREAD: OMgosh...are they for real? 1/

2/ LOL. It wasn't even a mean tweet!

3/ Lots of fake electors bs in here.

4/ So trying to pull in stuff from other states.

5/ Wait! How was this false?

6/ Right to Petition for free and full elections??? Is that a thing?

7/ This is nuts!

8/ "Contested states" hmmm seems like maybe Trump didn't think he lost but was CHALLENGING THE ELECTION RESULTS YOU NOBS!

9/ The shit they are pulling in here is unreal....How dare they push to have signatures verified!

10/ This was the basis of Trump's election lawsuit!!

11/11 So, other than intentional false statements under oath, to investigators, or during GA hearing, which may or not be actionable, the complaint is a bunch of nonsense but there is so much crap thrown in hard to decipher whether any thing has technical legs.

Post Twit: more thoughts tomorrow…yawn!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Dec 16

https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/2000986167899250862

Weird, FBI didn't have time planned for spreading out the documents with fake classified cover sheets to photograph and leak to the media.

https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/2000986167899250862

2/ Oh, well, they "opined," so I guess we should raid a former president's house then.

3/ The voice of reason...

Read 7 tweets

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Dec 9

THREADETTE: There were several telling exchanges during yesterday's SCOTUS argument in Trump v. Slaughter, but the one that struck me most was the final exchange between Justice Jackson & Slaughter's attorney. Read the full exchange below. 1/

2/ The problem is fundamental! Article I of the Constitution vests in CONGRESS the power to legislate--not unelected bureaucrats! And this ties into a second point: Jackson, Kagan, & Sotomayor all stressed Congress's "reliance interests" in creating "independent" agencies

3/ with the threesome arguing Congress relied limits on President's removal authority in granting agency regulatory authority. Well, there is a much bigger reliance interest at stake!

Read 4 tweets

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Dec 5

https://twitter.com/16NewsNow/status/1996716144372469840

😡😡😡ABSOLUTELY. DISGUSTING! So-called "Republican" Dan Schaetzle is smearing my brother Jamie O'Brien, who is huge MAGA (might that be why?). While a local story, Schaetzle's behavior should be make him anathema in not just politics but polite society! 1/

https://twitter.com/16NewsNow/status/1996716144372469840

/2 Also shame on @16NewsNow for pushing Schaetzle's preferred narrative that it is about my brother when more accurately Schaetzle is claiming the County never should have sought pension for ANY County Council attorneys most (all?) of whom were Dems before my brother.

@16NewsNow 3/ Here's the backdrop on Slimy Schaetzle's plot with details from Amy Drake.

Read 6 tweets

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Nov 11

Holy CRAP! A district court judge entered an injunction that allowed the states that had processed 100% of SNAP without authorization to keep the money! Trump is still seeking stay of lower court's order to fund SNAP with school lunch money. 1/