Ruriko: So when do we register with Chicago?
Me: We don’t.
R: So how does Chicago know everyone who lives in Chicago?
Me: It doesn’t.
R: … Does America have a government? How do you even do population statistics?!
Me: Count every ten years.
R: You ARE TROLLING ME.
The last few minutes have been her working through the implications for every benefits program administered locally, with increasing levels of horror.
Ruriko: Wait you mean Chicago Public Schools literally does not know Liam and Lillian exist unless we tell them that.
Me: Yep.
Ruriko: So there’s no form to tell them that we are putting our children in private school?
Me: No form.
Ruriko: So if a child is just not enrolled they…
Me: Hopefully are seen by truant officers who will eventually cause someone to ask about the circumstances.
Ruriko: TROLLING.
Ruriko: Next you’re going to tell me the national government doesn’t have a record of everyone who lives here.
Me: In practice it does but in principle it does not.
R: WHAT.
Me: It is considered politically unpalatable to create a list of all citizens and/or immigrants.
R: WHY.
Me: … So that is why we backdoor the problem with a combination of Social Security records and privately maintained credit databases.
Ruriko: STOP STOP STOP.
Ruriko: But if city hall doesn’t have a record of us living how will your employer be able to identify you to them to pay taxes for your account.
Me: They don’t keep accounts that way. Employers don’t do taxes, though they will do withholding. We will self-file and then if…
Ruriko: … Is our marriage even legal here?!?
Me: Yes.
R: Where did you register it if not city hall?!
Me: Nowhere.
R: Then how does America know we’re married?!
Me: When relevant, we say so, and they say “OK then you’re married.”
R: WHAT.
Me: Doctrine of comity.
Ruriko: So if we got married here we would have… a piece of paper.
Me: Yes it’s called a marriage license or somesuch.
R: We are unlicensed.
Me: Yes but only in a very technical sense.
R: Can we get a license?
Me: No.
R: What.
Me: People w/ existing marriage can’t get married.
Ruriko: What if I have to demonstrate the fact of the marriage somehow?
Me: Well there’s a boring technical answer involving apostilles to authenticate a series of records which would allow an American judicial process to recognize Japanese records but in practice…
Me: … everyone just takes your word for it.
Ruriko: … You are dealing with all of this American nonsense.
Me: Had a feeling I would be.
Ruriko: … How do you do health insurance?
Me: Hah funny you should ask. Let’s have that conversation when you’re calm and sitting down.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting article about falling backwards into founding a non-profit and then doing policy advocacy work, which had a number of points which resonated with me:
There is another paragraph about feeling turbocharged imposter syndrome when talking to subject matter experts and then realizing they’ve spent 0.01% of their career on *exactly* your new problem and so you understood it better than they do as of about day four or so.
In today's very surprising example of things an LLM could be good at:
I had a print failure while running a resin print in the wee hours of the morning.
Debugging these is a bit maddening. They arise from a combination of software, math, chemistry, and unpredictable chaos.
They're also very underdocumented. (In what is surely a first in the history of manufacturing.)
The community is spread between various Facebook groups and Discords, and writes little down formally. Most recorded lore is in YouTube videos, and aimed at low-skill enthusiasts.
And when a print failure happens, all you have to go on is the symptom to figure out where to start investigating. You'll see e.g. a sheer within a print or a melted rump instead of a dragon or, as happened with me yesterday, a build plate wrenched to 30 degrees off level.
There are Sorts within the Sort, all the way down.
(Incidentally, if you have an academically disinclined young family member who nonetheless is not a layabout, GC is potentially a good career for them.
Most people get into it after a stint in trades or real estate, but that isn’t strictly required.)
I don’t have anything novel to contribute on the substance of but have to again comment, pace Situational Awareness that I think kicked this trend off, that single-essay microdomains with a bit of design, a bit of JS, and perhaps a downloadable PDF are…ai-2027.com
… a really interesting form factor for policy arguments (or other ideas) designed to spread.
Back in the day, “I paid $15 to FedEx to put this letter in your hands” was one powerful way to sort oneself above the noise at a decisionmaker’s physical inbox, and “I paid $8.95 for a domain name” has a similar function to elevate things which are morally similar to blog posts.
This week on Complex Systems, a continued discussion of credit card rewards, interchange, and what I believe is a persistent misconception about how society should want justice done via payments systems.
It ends with the following, which the team took the liberty of putting into a short clip. (Sound on if you like hearing my voice, but video is subtitled.)
Last week the Atlantic published an opinion piece which argues that the poor are subsidizing the rich's receipt of credit card rewards. This view has wide currency among certain advocates and among opinion writers.
It is not true.
Credit card rewards are actually funded by interchange, a cost which is ultimately paid by card-accepting businesses for a combination of services they get from the payments industry.
Rewards have a few equilibria globally; the U.S. is in a high rewards, high interchange one.
An argument I have had with some credit card enthusiasts for a very long time, paraphrased.
Enthusiasts: I’m robbing the bank blind!
Me: Doubtful? They are probably pretty happy to have a portfolio of you.
E: Oh by carefully layering promotions and making a spreadsheet and…
Me: So checking my understanding: you spend a lot of money on credit cards.
E: Yes, that’s the whole point.
Me: And in a nation which makes it illegal to underwrite using an IQ test, you have self-constructed an IQ test.
E: Yes and I pass it obviously.
Me: Right. Tracking.
Me: You sound like a very desirable bank customer.
E: Oh no I’m not! I take them so hard.
Me: Your income and net worth are likely to be quite higher in ten years right. You predict that too?
E: Oh yeah.
Me: Yeah you’re going to continue consuming lots of financial services.