Post

More from @robinmonotti

Robin Monotti

@robinmonotti

Mar 4

"NOT ONE INCH EASTWARD"
OR HOW NATO FOOLED RUSSIA
" U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University

The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels.

The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.”[1] The key phrase, buttressed by the documents, is “led to believe.”

President George H.W. Bush had assured Gorbachev during the Malta summit in December 1989 that the U.S. would not take advantage (“I have not jumped up and down on the Berlin Wall”) of the revolutions in Eastern Europe to harm Soviet interests; but neither Bush nor Gorbachev at that point (or for that matter, West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl) expected so soon the collapse of East Germany or the speed of German unification.[2]

The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO..
The conversations before Kohl’s assurance involved explicit discussion of NATO expansion, the Central and East European countries, and how to convince the Soviets to accept unification. For example, on February 6, 1990, when Genscher met with British Foreign Minister Douglas Hurd, the British record showed Genscher saying, “The Russians must have some assurance that if, for example, the Polish Government left the Warsaw Pact one day, they would not join NATO the next.” (See Document 2)
Not once, but three times, Baker tried out the “not one inch eastward” formula with Gorbachev in the February 9, 1990, meeting. He agreed with Gorbachev’s statement in response to the assurances that “NATO expansion is unacceptable.” Baker assured Gorbachev that “neither the President nor I intend to extract any unilateral advantages from the processes that are taking place,” and that the Americans understood that “not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” (See Document 6)
8)"

"Afterwards, Baker wrote to Helmut Kohl who would meet with the Soviet leader on the next day, with much of the very same language. Baker reported: “And then I put the following question to him [Gorbachev]. Would you prefer to see a united Germany outside of NATO, independent and with no U.S. forces or would you prefer a unified Germany to be tied to NATO, with assurances that NATO’s jurisdiction would not shift one inch eastward from its present position? He answered that the Soviet leadership was giving real thought to all such options [….] He then added, ‘Certainly any extension of the zone of NATO would be unacceptable.’” Baker added in parentheses, for Kohl’s benefit, “By implication, NATO in its current zone might be acceptable.” (See Document 8)

Well-briefed by the American secretary of state, the West German chancellor understood a key Soviet bottom line, and assured Gorbachev on February 10, 1990: “We believe that NATO should not expand the sphere of its activity.” (See Document 9) After this meeting, Kohl could hardly contain his excitement at Gorbachev’s agreement in principle for German unification and, as part of the Helsinki formula that states choose their own alliances, so Germany could choose NATO. Kohl described in his memoirs walking all night around Moscow – but still understanding there was a price still to pay.

All the Western foreign ministers were on board with Genscher, Kohl, and Baker. Next came the British foreign minister, Douglas Hurd, on April 11, 1990. At this point, the East Germans had voted overwhelmingly for the deutschmark and for rapid unification, in the March 18 elections in which Kohl had surprised almost all observers with a real victory. Kohl’s analyses (first explained to Bush on December 3, 1989) that the GDR’s collapse would open all possibilities, that he had to run to get to the head of the train, that he needed U.S. backing, that unification could happen faster than anyone thought possible – all turned out to be correct. Monetary union would proceed as early as July and the assurances about security kept coming. Hurd reinforced the Baker-Genscher-Kohl message in his meeting with Gorbachev in Moscow, April 11, 1990, saying that Britain clearly “recognized the importance of doing nothing to prejudice Soviet interests and dignity.” (See Document 15)"

"The Baker conversation with Shevardnadze on May 4, 1990, as Baker described it in his own report to President Bush, most eloquently described what Western leaders were telling Gorbachev exactly at the moment: “I used your speech and our recognition of the need to adapt NATO, politically and militarily, and to develop CSCE to reassure Shevardnadze that the process would not yield winners and losers. Instead, it would produce a new legitimate European structure – one that would be inclusive, not exclusive.” (See Document 17)

Baker said it again, directly to Gorbachev on May 18, 1990 in Moscow, giving Gorbachev his “nine points,” which included the transformation of NATO, strengthening European structures, keeping Germany non-nuclear, and taking Soviet security interests into account. Baker started off his remarks, “Before saying a few words about the German issue, I wanted to emphasize that our policies are not aimed at separating Eastern Europe from the Soviet Union. We had that policy before. But today we are interested in building a stable Europe, and doing it together with you.” (See Document 18)

The French leader Francois Mitterrand was not in a mind-meld with the Americans, quite the contrary, as evidenced by his telling Gorbachev in Moscow on May 25, 1990, that he was “personally in favor of gradually dismantling the military blocs”; but Mitterrand continued the cascade of assurances by saying the West must “create security conditions for you, as well as European security as a whole.” (See Document 19) Mitterrand immediately wrote Bush in a “cher George” letter about his conversation with the Soviet leader, that “we would certainly not refuse to detail the guarantees that he would have a right to expect for his country’s security.” (See Document 20)"

Read 6 tweets

Robin Monotti

@robinmonotti

Feb 26

WHAT JD VANCE WARNED US ABOUT:
GEORGESCU ARRESTED IN ROMANIA
Romanian Presidential front runner candidate Calin Georgescu arrested in Romania, following cancelled elections he was due to win. He should be President of Romania, instead he is in jail.

Cаlin Georgescu was arrested for questioning about "actions against the constitutional order, public incitement, initiation of a fascist organization, and false statements regarding the sources of financing for the electoral campaign."

WHY WAS GEORGESCU ARRESTED? NATO TRUTH.

In a 2021 interview, he called NATO's ballistic missile defence shield in the Romanian town of Deveselu a "shame of diplomacy" and said the North Atlantic alliance will not protect any of its members should they be attacked by Russia.

Read 5 tweets

Robin Monotti

@robinmonotti

Feb 11

HIV PASSPORTS ARE THE NEW GLOBALIST TROJAN HORSE

“HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause AIDS.”
Luc Montagnier

AIDS is the new trojan horse for digital IDs now linked by Big Pharma/Big ID to sexual activity and HIV status.

First they used travel bans and Covid19 fearmongering, but it didn't work to get a large enough numbers of the young hooked on digital IDs to balance those resisting them, so now they are using sex and the fear of AIDS to usher in their digital ID system for the next generations.

You heard it here first.

And yes, repeated boosters will compromise the immune system leading to V-AIDS (vaccine acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome) which will be misdiagnosed as "HIV caused AIDS", and splices of HIV in the "vaccine" mRNA spike protein coding will make it more likely for the "vaccinated" to PCR test positive for HIV, starting the new PCR pseudoepidemic of HIV false testing.

2015 gain of function research confirming HIV pseudovirus used in SARSCOV made in Wuhan:

2015: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
Vineet D Menachery, Boyd L Yount, Jr, [...], and Ralph S Baric

"Pseudotyping experiments were similar to those using an
👉HIV-based pseudovirus, prepared as previously described10, and examined on HeLa cells (Wuhan Institute of Virology) that expressed ACE2 orthologs."

"In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article."

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

Montagnier confirming HIV RNA is in the SARSCOV2 virus itself:

Another interesting article on recently passed Luc Montagnier - his commentary on "HIV RNA viral segments spliced surgically within the SARSCoV2 genome" and his research on optical biophysics.

April 30, 2020:

Excerpt:

This April 16th, Dr. Luc Montagnier became a household name around the world. This occurred as the controversial virologist decided to publicly state his support for the theory that Covid-19 is indeed a laboratory-generated creation and not a naturally occurring effect of viral evolution.

Referring to a study published at the Kusama School of Biology in New Dehli on January 31st, Montagnier (the 2008 Nobel Prize winner for his 1983 discovery of the HIV virus) made the point that the specific occurrence of HIV RNA viral segments spliced surgically within the SARSCoV2 genome could not have originated naturally and he described it in the following words:

“We have carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus. We weren’t the first, a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study showing that the complete genome of this virus that has within the sequences of another virus: that of HIV.”

While the Indian team was induced to retract their publication under immense pressure from the mainstream medical establishment (which never bothered to seriously refute the content of the study’s research but rather used the “random-mutation-makes-anything-possible” argument), Montagnier stated “scientific truth always emerges”.

Look for archived version:
strategic-culture.org/news/2020/04/3…

Read 8 tweets

Robin Monotti

@robinmonotti

Feb 11

LUC MONTAGNIER, 2008 NOBEL PRIZE FOR DISCOVERING HIV:

"The HIV virus is harmless and passive, a benign virus."

Luc Montagnier
1990 AIDS conference
San Francisco

In 1990 Montagnier said the cause of the immune collapse known as AIDS was a mycoplasma (infertans) infection, which made the harmless HIV virus more dangerous. The cure for mycoplasma infections? Tetracycline antibiotics, same as in severe Covid19 infection in the example of Doxycycline. Oh and they work against cancer too in some cases.

"Tetracyclines are a group of natural products produced by soil-borne Actinobacteria. Their broad-spectrum biological activities such as antibiotic, anticancer, and novel activity against tetracycline resistant bacteria are attributed to their signature linearly fused four ring structure."
escholarship.org/uc/item/6xr8j3…

Read 5 tweets

Robin Monotti

@robinmonotti

Dec 17, 2024

The truth about "polio" paralysis: it was DDT poisoning:
"Flying and Biting Bugs on Jones Beach Die in a Cloud of DDT, New Insecticide—A truck-mounted for generator squirts the poison, mixed with oil droplets, over a four-mile area of the New York City playground. Spread by Army and Navy planes and by hand sprays, DDT routed dangerous disease-bearing flies and mosquitoes on Pacific islands. DDT has a drawback—it kills many beneficial and harmless insects, but does not kill all insect pests. Birds and fish which eat large numbers of DDT-poisoned insects may be casualties too. (National Geographic Magazine, October 1945, p. 410)"

dissolvingillusions.com/graphs-images/

The truth about "polio" paralysis: it was DDT poisoning.
"The great expectations held for DDT have been realized.” Penn Salt chemicals advertisement. (Time Magazine, June 30, 1947)

Read 9 tweets

Robin Monotti

@robinmonotti

Dec 2, 2024

Bergamo in March 2020 was a choreographed piece of military theatre to hoodwink global populations into lockdowns, as revealed in Italy's Covid enquiry in November 2024.

presskit.it/en/2024/11/21/…

Martedì 19 Novembre 2024 ore 10:30
Audizioni rappresentanti OSA Polizia, COISP e Fondazione TDC19 ETS
"Presso la sala del II piano di Palazzo San Macuto, la Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sulla gestione dell'emergenza sanitaria causata dalla diffusione epidemica del virus sars-cov-2 e sulle misure adottate per prevenire e affrontare l'emergenza epidemiologica da sars-cov-2, ha svolto le seguenti audizioni:

ore 10.30                rappresentanti di OSA Polizia (Organizzazione sindacale autonoma Polizia);
ore 11.00                COISP (Coordinamento per l'indipendenza sindacale delle Forze di Polizia);
ore 11.30                Fondazione TDC19 ETS (Terapie domiciliari Covid-19 Ente del terzo settore)."
webtv.camera.it/evento/26677

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Robin Monotti

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @robinmonotti

Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti

Robin Monotti

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!