Madi Kapparov Profile picture
Aug 22 41 tweets 10 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Rosatom is still not sanctioned. @RUSI_org published a report analyzing Russia’s nuclear energy exports, an industry that is dominated by the state-owned conglomerate, Rosatom (). 1/ static.rusi.org/RUSI-Russian-E…
Image
It was followed up with a note on the world’s dependence on Russia’s U-235, isotope of uranium necessary for nuclear energy and weapons production (). 2/static.rusi.org/RUSI-Russian-E…
However, neither of the pieces address the elephant in the room – Rosatom’s creeping world monopoly on the uranium market and how it was achieved.
Is Russia the largest or second largest producer of uranium in the world? 3/
No. In 2022 Russia was the sixth largest producer lagging far behind Kazakhstan, the world’s largest producer supplying 43% of the global output. 4/ world-nuclear.org/information-li…
Image
Despite its nonleading position in production, Russia still boasts to be controlling the second largest uranium reserves in the world through Rosatom. Let’s discuss how it was achieved. 5/ Image
Earlier this year Russian state media announced Rosatom’s rising dominance on the global uranium market.

However, is it the case? It is complicated. 6/
For about the past decade and a half Rosatom gradually expanded their ownership in Kazakh mines through joint ventures with Kazatomprom, Kazakh state-owned nuclear energy company. However, it was not done directly not to raise concerns. 7/
Without getting into much detail, one of the companies key to the capture was Uranium One. In 2007 the company acquired UrAsia Energy and with it stakes in three uranium mines in Kazakhstan. At the time Uranium One was still Canadian. 8/
However, in 2009 Rosatom acquired a 17% share in the company in exchange for stakes in another mine in Kazakhstan. In 2010 Rosatom expanded their share in Uranium One to 51% in exchange for stakes in two additional mines in Kazakhstan. 9/
So, what started as mixed Russian and Canadian presence in those mines ended under Rosatom’s control. By 2013 Uranium One became a wholly owned subsidiary of Rosatom. 10/
Through the subsidiary Rosatom still owns a uranium mine in the US, albeit a mothballed one ().
Given that Uranium One had presence on the US market Rosatom’s acquisition had to be approved by the US authorities. 11/neimagazine.com/news/newsurani…
The approval was controversial and was used by Trump on the campaign trail against Hillary Clinton in 2016, given her and Bill Clinton’s direct and indirect involvement (). 12/thehill.com/policy/nationa…
The Hill writes: “Then-Attorney General Eric Holder was among the Obama administration officials joining Hillary Clinton on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the time the Uranium One deal was approved. 13/
Multiple current and former government officials told The Hill they did not know whether the FBI or DOJ ever alerted committee members to the criminal activity they uncovered.” 14/
The NYT also reported $2.85 million in donations and speech fees from the Russian to the Clinton Foundation. The NYT writes: “Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. 15/
But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state,… 16/
…presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.” (). However, the “scandal” was later dismissed (). 17/nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/…
bloomberg.com/view/articles/…
I venture to guess that Rosatom’s primary interest was not in the US mines when they acquired Uranium One – it was about Kazakhstan. 18/
Interestingly Bill Clinton’s proximity to Kazakh uranium starts in 2005 when travelled to Kazakhstan with Frank Giustra, the founder of UrAsia that was acquired by Uranium One in 2007. 19/
In a 2008 article, the NYT reports the “the former president knew that Mr. Giustra had mining interests in Kazakhstan but was unaware of “any particular efforts” and did nothing to help.” 20/
After the trip to Kazakhstan, “Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra” (). 21/nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/…
The ever-increasing Rosatom’s ownership of Kazakh uranium culminated with the acquisition of the largest mine in Kazakhstan, Byudonovskoe with a potential output in excess 6,000 tons a year. 22/
The details of the transaction are unclear and are yet to be disclosed (). The acquisition occurred in 2022, however was first reported only in May 2023. 23/rus.azattyq.org/a/kak-samoe-kr…
Bloomberg reported that “the deal was pushed by Kazakhstan’s sovereign wealth fund against the wishes of the leadership at miner Kazatomprom” (). 24/bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Recall that since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia, Russia has also been pressuring Kazakhstan by various means including oil pipeline disruptions, offhanded invasion threats, cruise missile launches against Ukraine from the Caspian Sea, water… 25/
…supply disruptions, etc. Did any of those events impact the decision to sell the soon to be largest uranium mine in the world to Russia?
Direct ownership of mines is not the only way Rosatom maintains a stranglehold over Kazakh uranium. 26/
Naturally occurring uranium is less than 1% U-235 isotope and requires enrichment. Though Russia produces only 2-3 thousand tonnes of uranium a year, its annual enrichment capacity is at 24.3 thousand tonnes (). 27/ world-nuclear.org/information-li…
Image
Whereas despite having the leading position in production Kazakhstan has no meaningful uranium enrichment capacities (). Due to geographic and logistical constraints most of Kazakh uranium is transported to Russia for enrichment. 28/world-nuclear.org/information-li…
Russia and Kazakhstan had plans to construct a joint enrichment facility in Russia, however, for various reasons the plans were scrapped and Kazakhstan was allowed to acquire a 49% share in the Novouralsk enrichment facility in Russia. 29/
In 2020 the Kazakh share in the enrichment facility was sold back to Russia leaving Rosatom in full control over enrichment (). As of the most recent reports 76% of Kazakh uranium was exported to Russia (). 30/world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Kazat…
forbes.kz/economy/energy…
So why is sanctioning Rosatom important?

First, Russia does not shy away from using energy markets as a geopolitical tool. They did it with natural gas supplies to Europe. They will do it on the global uranium market if allowed. 31/
Rosatom plans to expand their presence in Africa as well ().

Second, there are reports that Rosatom supplies Russian weapons manufacturers with critical components abusing it is civilian and unsanctioned status. 32/tass.com/russia/1651987
WaPo reports that ballistic missile, MLRS, unguided bomb, cluster munition, AFV manufacturers are supplied by Rosatom (). 33/washingtonpost.com/world/2023/01/…
Third, Rosatom took over the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant thuggishly claiming ownership of the facility ().

Could dependence on Russian uranium and enrichment services be reduced to allow for sanctions? 34/pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/…
Dory Castillo-Peters and Frank von Hippel proposed trading uranium for enrichment services, reopening uranium mines and increasing enrichment capacity, uranium conversion, and fuel fabrication (). 35/thebulletin.org/2022/08/us-and…
However, I would also urge D.C. and other Western capitals to be more cognizant of Kazakhstan’s position. Some foreign policy mistakes were made in the past, best not to repeat them. 36/
Considering that Russia’s enmity with the West is unlikely to end in the coming years, Kazakhstan should not become Russia’s nuclear energy policy pillar. 37/
Moreover, China’s economic interests in the region are also expanding, as @PaulGoble1 writes. I recommend reading his note in full: . 38/jamestown.org/program/kazakh…
Currently Kazakhstan is considering bids for a proposed nuclear power plant (). Rosatom placed their bid as well and should they win, Russia’s presence on the global nuclear market will solidify. 39/astanatimes.com/2023/08/nuclea…
Hence, it would be prudent to consider options to aid Kazakhstan is reducing dependence on Russia’s enrichment facilities either through construction of such facilities in Kazakhstan or developing a viable trade route bypassing Russia for unprocessed uranium. 40/
Also, more details should also be requested about the acquisition of the Byudonovskoe mine – previously such transactions included “incentives” to some parties involved from across the globe as indicated in the sources I cited above. 41/41

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Madi Kapparov

Madi Kapparov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MuKappa

Aug 19
The Kremlin has a "collective West." The Russian "liberal" opposition has a "collective Putin." The same Russian opposition, for their most part, offer a lucrative deal with the Russian population. They, as eternal victims of their own making through inaction and mob mentality...
are offered a way out. "Виновные уже назначены" or the guilty are already appointed. It is Putin, the "minorities," Russophobia, and the ever elusive international cabals. But it is certainly not them, not russkiye. They have friends in the West who help them.
Applebaums, Millers, Grozevs of the world have well established reputations. That's why subtle pro-Russian narratives are so easily catered by them either directly or through the system of network reputation. To be clear, I am not calling them Russian assets.
Read 12 tweets
Aug 9
This is a major development - regional town and cities are ordered to introduce price caps to stem the tide of inflationary pressures. This is very similar to the measures introduced by the USSR in the late 80s and the Russian Federation in the early 90s. 1/ https://t.co/tS2ftLRRi2
Image
Econ 101: price caps eliminate the possibility of having a free market defined equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity. With lower supply and higher demand at the state mandated price cap the market for a good (e.g. soap) will experience shortages. 2/ Image
How did the USSR and later Russia solve the issue of shortages for price capped staples and attempted to limit the rise of black markets? Produktovye talony or "food stamps." The translation is a bit of a misnomer as the stamps were not limited to food. In some regions they... 3/


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 2
All or not all: on pro-war sentiments in Russia and collective responsibility

Almost a year and a half into the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia the debate on popular support for the war in Russia continues. 1/ Image
A particularly thorny issue for the many Russia experts is collective guilt and responsibility. The two are closely related topics. Let’s discuss support for the war first.

I personally like citing the Levada polls. It is an easy visual representation. 2/
However, Levada’s and other polls in Russia are intensely criticized as nonindicative of the real sentiment in the country (e.g. ). 3/meduza.io/feature/2016/0…
Read 50 tweets
Jul 13
Before I make my attempt at imagining post-war Russia, it is necessary to explain why a parliamentary system would not work. Such a system is sometimes proposed by @navalny and @khodorkovsky_en without explaining how to implement such a system. 1/
So why would the proposed parliamentary system fail? It would fail to achieve the desired democratization and turn Russia into a peaceful neighbor because that would require true decentralization from Moscow. That can never happen without at least a partial collapse. 2/
First, let's talk about the economic reasons. The Russian Federation is set up as a contiguous colonial land empire, as were the prior versions of the Russian empire. While other European empires had their colonies in faraway lands, Russia captured its neighbors. 3/
Read 25 tweets
Jul 11
In a country with imperialist views as the norm and deeply ingrained views of russian ethnic exceptionalism in their culture, russia cannot have an opposition that even remotely resembles its counterparts in the West. 1/
Adding the layers of a *still* extractive economy with colonies (regions) governed from a metropole (Moscow), corruption as a feature of the governance system, and systemic poverty as an oppression tool no true opposition capable of transformative reforms in russia may emerge. 2/
Thus, @NATO let me ask you this, I know you have some of the brightest people in your ranks and advising you on russian matters: whose genius idea was it to let @Kasparov63 speak? Why was navalny's team even allowed on the summit grounds? 3/3
Read 4 tweets
Jul 10
What of Kara-Murza? There are few things that are commendable about him and few things that raise a few questions. For instance, his work as a foreign corresponded for Kommersant and his time at Echo of Moscow.
Another one is the Magnitsky Act. Let me explain. 1/
The Magnitsky Act was a good initiative to punish russian officials involved in the death of Sergei Magnitsky. However, consider the long title: Russia and Moldova Jackson–Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012. 2/
The Magnitsky Act came as a packaged deal with the repeal of the Jackson-Vanik amendment to the Trade Act of 1974. It was introduced against the USSR (and other countries) as punishment for restricting freedom of Jewish emigration and other human rights. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(