In today's #vatniksoup, I'll introduce an Austrian journalist, Christian Wehrschütz (@Wehrschu).
He's best-known for supporting and spreading pro-Kremlin narratives on the Russo-Ukrainian War.
1/20
As I've previously written, Austria is a hotspot for pro-Kremlin activities:
This is often factored to strong Russo-Austrian economic ties, but there are other variables at play, too. One of those is the way how @ORF, Austria's biggest media...
Almost 70% of Austrians follow ORF's radio coverage, and their website boasts with over 120 million monthly visits. ORF's reporting might be one of the reasons why Austria's pro-Russia sentiment is on the rise, and right-wing, pro-Kremlin parties like FPÖ lead the polls.
4/20
Wehrschütz started his media career back in the 80s, when he contributed to the Austrian far-right magazine Die Aula. Later he was the editor of "Neue Freie Zeitung," the official publication of FPÖ. Wehrschütz was also member of FPÖ until 2002.
5/20
He worked as a part-time correspondent in Kyiv, and his controversial takes started already in 2014, when he published a book called "Brennpunkt Ukraine". In it, he claimed that "there was, of course, an organization that someone financed" the Revolution of Dignity.
6/20
This same claim, without a shred of evidence, has come from filmmakers like Igor Lopatonok, whose propaganda piece "Ukraine on Fire" provided us a very one-sided image of what happened in Ukraine in 2014:
On 20 Feb 2014, he blamed the violence in Kyiv to the "extreme opposition", saying that they've sent snipers on the scene. He somehow forgot to mention the Berkut snipers, the paid "Titushky" thugs & the constant meddling of pro-Russian actors in his "balanced" report.
8/20
Later, in 2022, he doubled-down on his claims, insisting on the "correctness" of his reporting and self-praising his ability to "draw a far more differentiated picture than was offered by the usual Maidan reporting," that he called "a one-sided good/evil scheme"
9/20
After Russia illegally annexed Crimea and parts of the Donbas, Wehrschütz called the latter "pro-Russian rebel republics". As we now know from the Surkov and Glazeyev leaks, these sentiments were largely fabricated by the Kremlin propagandists and businessmen.
10/20
In Feb 2015, he stated in an interview that "It is clear Putin is no longer interested in aggravating the conflict because it involves extremely high costs." Before this interview, he was awarded with Austria's coveted "Journalist of the Year" for his "balanced" journalism.
11/20
In Dec 2018, the Ukrainian authorities refused to renew his authorization to work in the front line area in Donbas. At the same time, he claimed to be in danger and threatened by Ukraine's "militant, ultra-nationalist groups". He also demanded a diplomatic intervention.
12/20
Then-Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl, the same Kneissl with #vatniksoup fame, intervened publically on Wehrschütz's behalf. She has since moved to Russia, calling it "her world" and better place for holiday than Seychelles or Maledives. To each their own, I guess.
13/20
Eventually, due to Kneissl's and the Austrian government's pressure, Wehrschütz's authorization to work in the Donbas front lines was returned. Russian propaganda machinery couldn't miss this opportunity and quickly produced some articles defaming Ukrainian authorities.
14/20
In March 2019, despite the Austrian government and Kneissl lobbying hard on his behalf, Christian faced a ban on entering Ukraine, which he protested in a Kyiv court. His lawyer, Maryna Parinova, allegedly has connections to Yanukovych's old administration.
15/20
Wehrschütz has also written for Austria's biggest tabloid called "Kronen Zeitung," in which he has warned about "escalation" & criticized the weapons deliveries to Ukraine. @Wehrschu,do you agree that this "diplomacy" should include Russia leaving Ukraine, including Crimea?
16/20
In regard to Bucha, he questioned "whether all the corpses lying around there have really been victims of Russian war crimes." He continued that "The pictures from Bucha are terrible - but the hypocrisy of the West and its failed policies of the past 30 years are terrible."
17/20
Some weeks later, he he did "not yet want to speak of a massacre", because of they, in his opinion, were used for "influencing public opinion". Later, when the overwhelming evidence of Russian atrocities came to light, he asked that "who is still talking about Bucha today?"
18/20
Ukrainian Ambassador to Austria, Vasyl Khymynets, was later outraged by Wehrschütz's comments on Izium mass graves. He said that Russian war crimes could not be verified and added that "we should not forget about the media and information war."
19/20
Allegedly, Mr. Wehrschütz has hired a group of high-profile lawyers who are known to sue everyone in Austria he deems even a slight threat to his reputation as an "objective" reporter.
I'm not sure if spreading Kremlin propaganda helps his image as an objective journalist.
20/20
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll talk about Finland and how pro-Kremlin propagandists have become more active in the Finnish political space since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For the first time since 2022, they’ve gained some political power in Finland.
1/16
Russia’s political strategy in countries with Russian-speaking minorities (such as Finland and the Baltics) is typically quite similar: it seeks to rally these minorities around issues like language and minority rights, and then frames the situation as oppression.
2/16
At the same time, Russian speakers are extremely wary and skeptical of local media, and instead tend to follow Russian domestic outlets like Russia-1 and NTV, thereby reinforcing an almost impenetrable information bubble.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll discuss the Ukrainian SBU’s “Spiderweb” operation and the main disinformation narrative vatniks have been spreading during the afterfall. While domestic Russian media stays silent, the vatniks and Russian milbloggers have been extremely loud.
1/20
This operation was probably the most impactful strike since the drowning of the Moskva, massively reducing Russia’s capability to bomb Ukrainian cities (or anyone else’s). It involved smuggling 117 FPV drones hidden in trucks into Russia. Once near airbases,…
2/20
…the roofs opened remotely, launching drones in synchronized waves to strike targets up to 4,000 km away. The mission took 18 months to plan. The unsuspecting Russian truck drivers who transported them had no idea they were delivering weapons deep behind their own lines.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Russian movie director, propagandist, and former priest: Ivan Okhlobystin. He’s best known for his strong support for the war on Ukraine and for his radical views, which are often used as a testbed for the domestic Russian audience.
1/20
Ivan was born in 1966 from a short-lived marriage between a 62-year-old chief physician and a 19-year-old engineering student. She later remarried, and the family moved from Kaluga province to Moscow. Ivan kept the surname Okhlobystin from his biological father.
2/20
After moving to Moscow, Ivan began studying at VGIK film school. He soon became a playwright for theatre productions and also wrote for Stolitsa magazine, which he later left because, as he put it, “it had become a brothel.”
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Ukrainian-born former State Duma deputy, Vladimir Medinsky. He is best known as one of the ideologues of the “Russkiy Mir”, for his close ties to Vladimir Putin, and for leading the “peace talks” in Turkey in 2022 and 2025.
1/20
During the late 1980s and early 1990s, Medinsky interned as a correspondent on the international desk of the TASS news agency, learning the ways of propaganda at an early age. Some time later, he earned two PhDs – one in political science and the other in history.
2/20
As is tradition in Russia, Medinsky’s academic work was largely pseudo-scientific and plagiarized. Dissernet found that 87 of 120 pages in his dissertation were copied from his supervisor’s thesis. His second dissertation was also heavily plagiarized.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce an American social media influencer, Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson). He’s best known for his plagiarism while working as a clickbait “journalist”, and for being paid by the Kremlin to spread anti-Ukraine and anti-Democratic narratives.
1/23
Benny graduated from the University of Iowa in 2009 with a degree in developmental psychology. His former high school buddy described him as the “smartest, most articulate kid in school,” and was disappointed to see him turn into a “cheating, low standard hack.”
2/23
After graduating, Benny dived directly into the world of outrage media. Benny’s first job was writing op-eds for far-right website Breitbart, from where he moved on to TheBlaze, a conservative media owned by Glenn Beck, and a spring board for many conservative influencers.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Cypriot politician and social media personality, Fidias Panayiotou (@Fidias0). He’s best known for his clickbait YouTube stunts and for voting against aid to Ukraine and the return of abducted Ukrainian children from Russia.
1/20
Fidias hails from Meniko, Cyprus. In 2019, he began posting videos on YouTube. After a slow start, he found his niche with clickbaity, MrBeast-style content featuring silly stunts, catchy titles and scripted dialogue. Today, Fidias has 2,7 million subscribers on YouTube.
2/20
Fidias’s channel started with trend-riding, but he found his niche in traveling without money — aka freeloading. In one video, he fare-dodged on the Bengaluru Metro. The train authority responded by saying they would file a criminal case against him.