Vatnik Soup Profile picture
Aug 22, 2023 21 tweets 10 min read Read on X
In today's #vatniksoup, I'll introduce an Austrian journalist, Christian Wehrschütz (@Wehrschu).

He's best-known for supporting and spreading pro-Kremlin narratives on the Russo-Ukrainian War.

1/20 Image
As I've previously written, Austria is a hotspot for pro-Kremlin activities:

This is often factored to strong Russo-Austrian economic ties, but there are other variables at play, too. One of those is the way how @ORF, Austria's biggest media...

2/20
...company, has framed Russia's invasion of Ukraine since the Revolution of Dignity took place in 2014.

For example, recently this state-funded public broadcaster became under scrutiny for showing fake news:

3/20
Almost 70% of Austrians follow ORF's radio coverage, and their website boasts with over 120 million monthly visits. ORF's reporting might be one of the reasons why Austria's pro-Russia sentiment is on the rise, and right-wing, pro-Kremlin parties like FPÖ lead the polls.

4/20

Image
Image
Image
Wehrschütz started his media career back in the 80s, when he contributed to the Austrian far-right magazine Die Aula. Later he was the editor of "Neue Freie Zeitung," the official publication of FPÖ. Wehrschütz was also member of FPÖ until 2002.

5/20

Image
Image
Image
He worked as a part-time correspondent in Kyiv, and his controversial takes started already in 2014, when he published a book called "Brennpunkt Ukraine". In it, he claimed that "there was, of course, an organization that someone financed" the Revolution of Dignity.

6/20 Image
This same claim, without a shred of evidence, has come from filmmakers like Igor Lopatonok, whose propaganda piece "Ukraine on Fire" provided us a very one-sided image of what happened in Ukraine in 2014:

7/20
On 20 Feb 2014, he blamed the violence in Kyiv to the "extreme opposition", saying that they've sent snipers on the scene. He somehow forgot to mention the Berkut snipers, the paid "Titushky" thugs & the constant meddling of pro-Russian actors in his "balanced" report.

8/20 Image
Later, in 2022, he doubled-down on his claims, insisting on the "correctness" of his reporting and self-praising his ability to "draw a far more differentiated picture than was offered by the usual Maidan reporting," that he called "a one-sided good/evil scheme"

9/20 Image
After Russia illegally annexed Crimea and parts of the Donbas, Wehrschütz called the latter "pro-Russian rebel republics". As we now know from the Surkov and Glazeyev leaks, these sentiments were largely fabricated by the Kremlin propagandists and businessmen.

10/20

Image
Image
Image
In Feb 2015, he stated in an interview that "It is clear Putin is no longer interested in aggravating the conflict because it involves extremely high costs." Before this interview, he was awarded with Austria's coveted "Journalist of the Year" for his "balanced" journalism.
11/20
Image
Image
In Dec 2018, the Ukrainian authorities refused to renew his authorization to work in the front line area in Donbas. At the same time, he claimed to be in danger and threatened by Ukraine's "militant, ultra-nationalist groups". He also demanded a diplomatic intervention.

12/20
Then-Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl, the same Kneissl with #vatniksoup fame, intervened publically on Wehrschütz's behalf. She has since moved to Russia, calling it "her world" and better place for holiday than Seychelles or Maledives. To each their own, I guess.

13/20

Image
Image
Image
Eventually, due to Kneissl's and the Austrian government's pressure, Wehrschütz's authorization to work in the Donbas front lines was returned. Russian propaganda machinery couldn't miss this opportunity and quickly produced some articles defaming Ukrainian authorities.

14/20
Image
Image
In March 2019, despite the Austrian government and Kneissl lobbying hard on his behalf, Christian faced a ban on entering Ukraine, which he protested in a Kyiv court. His lawyer, Maryna Parinova, allegedly has connections to Yanukovych's old administration.

15/20 Image
Wehrschütz has also written for Austria's biggest tabloid called "Kronen Zeitung," in which he has warned about "escalation" & criticized the weapons deliveries to Ukraine. @Wehrschu,do you agree that this "diplomacy" should include Russia leaving Ukraine, including Crimea?
16/20 Image
In regard to Bucha, he questioned "whether all the corpses lying around there have really been victims of Russian war crimes." He continued that "The pictures from Bucha are terrible - but the hypocrisy of the West and its failed policies of the past 30 years are terrible."
17/20
Image
Image
Some weeks later, he he did "not yet want to speak of a massacre", because of they, in his opinion, were used for "influencing public opinion". Later, when the overwhelming evidence of Russian atrocities came to light, he asked that "who is still talking about Bucha today?"
18/20 Image
Ukrainian Ambassador to Austria, Vasyl Khymynets, was later outraged by Wehrschütz's comments on Izium mass graves. He said that Russian war crimes could not be verified and added that "we should not forget about the media and information war."

19/20
Image
Image
Allegedly, Mr. Wehrschütz has hired a group of high-profile lawyers who are known to sue everyone in Austria he deems even a slight threat to his reputation as an "objective" reporter.

I'm not sure if spreading Kremlin propaganda helps his image as an objective journalist.
20/20
Image
Image
All soups:
Support my work: vatniksoup.com
buymeacoffee.com/PKallioniemi

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vatnik Soup

Vatnik Soup Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @P_Kallioniemi

Mar 29
In this 8th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss complaints about US financing of NATO, in particular how the US allegedly pays for European defense, leading to calls for a US withdrawal from the Alliance — which would only make it easier for Putin to invade more countries.

1/7 A flight of French and Polish Rafale and F-16 fighter jets above a NATO flag during the opening of the exhibition “Powerful because we are united”, dedicated to the 19th anniversary of Lithuania’s 2004 accession to NATO (OTD 22 years ago), in the bastion of the Vilnius defensive wall on March 29, 2023 (OTD 3 years ago) in Vilnius, Lithuania. (Photo by Oleg Nikishin/Getty Images)
NATO by itself costs peanuts. In fact, the core of NATO is a principle, an agreement, that ideally costs nothing. The main cost is defense spending, which the US is eagerly doing anyway: Trump has just announced a 50% increase in military spending for his “Department of War”.
2/7 Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military, Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/02/21/trump-hegseth-budget-military/
Trump calls for US military spending to rise more than 50% to $1.5tn https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy59kxl2xwzo
Image
To sow division and thereby weaken the Alliance, vatniks deliberately mix up different figures, such as contributions to the NATO common budget, with defense spending. And US military spending has been huge by the sheer fact that the US is the world’s largest economy.

3/7 Newsweek falsely claiming that the US pays 68% of NATO’s budget. The real number is 15%.

Elon Musk falsely claiming that the US pays for 2/3 of European defense. In another post he claimed it was 1/4. Both made-up numbers.  https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1870903805845598428 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1870903805845598428
NATO has annual budgets and programs worth around EUR 4.6 billion in 2025 (representing 0.3% of total Allied defence spending), and up to EUR 5.3 billion in 2026. The US share for 2026-2027 is 15% of that: 0.8 billion.  Source: Funding NATO https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/funding-nato
Read 7 tweets
Mar 9
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll talk about why we’re doing this: why we think Ukraine is so important and why we believe that souping vatniks and debunking their propaganda narratives is so crucial to counter Russia’s & their allies’ wars of aggression and achieve real peace.

1/20 Image
War is expensive, and Russia is not a rich country that could afford this: Hospitals? Roads? Plumbing? No: everything into terror and destruction.

But not only that. There is a 2nd item in the Russian state budget that remains strong no matter what:

2/20
Image
Image
Image
Manufacturing support for that terror and destruction. Propaganda. Vatniks. “Innocent” travel bloggers. “Independent” journalists. “Patriotic” politicians. Russia spends hundreds of billions of rubles a year ($5 billion) on this, and that kind of money buys you A LOT of BS.

3/20 Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 2
In this second (and possibly last) Basiji Soup, we’ll explore how the Islamic Republic of Iran has prepared for a conflict with the US and Israel. We won’t cover the military aspects, but another kind of war — information warfare.

1/20 Image
In the 1st Basiji Soup, we souped the Islamic Republic, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, its support of terrorism including Russia’s, its (one-sided?) relationship with Putin, and the mass protests against it that started two months ago:

2/20
Image
The Internet blackout has been crucial in allowing the regime to cover up its massacre of the protesters and especially the scope of it, making it difficult to assess the number of victims. They went to great lengths to jam Starlink, after having made its use illegal.

3/20 Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 25
In this 7th Debunk of the Day, we’ll expose the “Chickenhawk” fallacy. The chickenhawk accusation or the “go to the front!” imperative is a dishonest attempt to silence anyone supporting Ukraine by pushing them to go fight. A barely hidden death wish, as it’s always uttered…
1/5 Image
Image
Image
…with zero regard for who you are or what your personal circumstances might be — you could already be there, on your way there, a veteran, or unable to fight. More broadly, not everyone can or should be a soldier, just as not everyone can or should be a policeman or a nurse.
2/5 Image
Image
Yet a society still needs those things to be done, and the fact that not everyone can go to medical school or fight crime does not mean that we have to surrender to invaders and criminals, nor that we cannot all have an opinion on healthcare.
3/5
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 18
In this 6th Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about a complex and controversial topic: conscription. It is used by vatniks to attack Ukraine for drafting men to fight, while conveniently ignoring the alternative, including the horrors of conscription into the Russian army.
1/8 Image
Military obligations are a reality in many countries, from the most peaceful democracies to the most tyrannical dictatorships — unless you have “bone spurs”. Some argue it is a necessity for defense against invading armies, especially for small countries.
2/8 Image
Others point out that it goes against individual rights or that a professional army is better. And Zelenskyy might agree: he did in fact end conscription. But then a full-scale invasion happened: exactly why many nations, including the US, still keep some form of draft.
3/8 Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 13
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll introduce the International Olympic Committee (IOC) @Olympics . It’s mostly known for organizing sporting events, and for being supposed to foster the Olympic ideal while actually submitting to dictators.

1/15 Image
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) was founded in 1894 in Paris by Pierre de Coubertin with a noble goal: promote peace through sports. Politics out, sportsmanship in: sounds great in theory.

2/15 Image
But in practice, the IOC has a long history of accommodating authoritarian regimes, always in the name of “neutrality,” “dialogue,” and “keeping sports separate from politics”, usually not in a particularly consistent or moral way.

3/15 Image
Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(