In today's #vatniksoup, I'll introduce an Austrian journalist, Christian Wehrschütz (@Wehrschu).
He's best-known for supporting and spreading pro-Kremlin narratives on the Russo-Ukrainian War.
1/20
As I've previously written, Austria is a hotspot for pro-Kremlin activities:
This is often factored to strong Russo-Austrian economic ties, but there are other variables at play, too. One of those is the way how @ORF, Austria's biggest media...
Almost 70% of Austrians follow ORF's radio coverage, and their website boasts with over 120 million monthly visits. ORF's reporting might be one of the reasons why Austria's pro-Russia sentiment is on the rise, and right-wing, pro-Kremlin parties like FPÖ lead the polls.
4/20
Wehrschütz started his media career back in the 80s, when he contributed to the Austrian far-right magazine Die Aula. Later he was the editor of "Neue Freie Zeitung," the official publication of FPÖ. Wehrschütz was also member of FPÖ until 2002.
5/20
He worked as a part-time correspondent in Kyiv, and his controversial takes started already in 2014, when he published a book called "Brennpunkt Ukraine". In it, he claimed that "there was, of course, an organization that someone financed" the Revolution of Dignity.
6/20
This same claim, without a shred of evidence, has come from filmmakers like Igor Lopatonok, whose propaganda piece "Ukraine on Fire" provided us a very one-sided image of what happened in Ukraine in 2014:
On 20 Feb 2014, he blamed the violence in Kyiv to the "extreme opposition", saying that they've sent snipers on the scene. He somehow forgot to mention the Berkut snipers, the paid "Titushky" thugs & the constant meddling of pro-Russian actors in his "balanced" report.
8/20
Later, in 2022, he doubled-down on his claims, insisting on the "correctness" of his reporting and self-praising his ability to "draw a far more differentiated picture than was offered by the usual Maidan reporting," that he called "a one-sided good/evil scheme"
9/20
After Russia illegally annexed Crimea and parts of the Donbas, Wehrschütz called the latter "pro-Russian rebel republics". As we now know from the Surkov and Glazeyev leaks, these sentiments were largely fabricated by the Kremlin propagandists and businessmen.
10/20
In Feb 2015, he stated in an interview that "It is clear Putin is no longer interested in aggravating the conflict because it involves extremely high costs." Before this interview, he was awarded with Austria's coveted "Journalist of the Year" for his "balanced" journalism.
11/20
In Dec 2018, the Ukrainian authorities refused to renew his authorization to work in the front line area in Donbas. At the same time, he claimed to be in danger and threatened by Ukraine's "militant, ultra-nationalist groups". He also demanded a diplomatic intervention.
12/20
Then-Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl, the same Kneissl with #vatniksoup fame, intervened publically on Wehrschütz's behalf. She has since moved to Russia, calling it "her world" and better place for holiday than Seychelles or Maledives. To each their own, I guess.
13/20
Eventually, due to Kneissl's and the Austrian government's pressure, Wehrschütz's authorization to work in the Donbas front lines was returned. Russian propaganda machinery couldn't miss this opportunity and quickly produced some articles defaming Ukrainian authorities.
14/20
In March 2019, despite the Austrian government and Kneissl lobbying hard on his behalf, Christian faced a ban on entering Ukraine, which he protested in a Kyiv court. His lawyer, Maryna Parinova, allegedly has connections to Yanukovych's old administration.
15/20
Wehrschütz has also written for Austria's biggest tabloid called "Kronen Zeitung," in which he has warned about "escalation" & criticized the weapons deliveries to Ukraine. @Wehrschu,do you agree that this "diplomacy" should include Russia leaving Ukraine, including Crimea?
16/20
In regard to Bucha, he questioned "whether all the corpses lying around there have really been victims of Russian war crimes." He continued that "The pictures from Bucha are terrible - but the hypocrisy of the West and its failed policies of the past 30 years are terrible."
17/20
Some weeks later, he he did "not yet want to speak of a massacre", because of they, in his opinion, were used for "influencing public opinion". Later, when the overwhelming evidence of Russian atrocities came to light, he asked that "who is still talking about Bucha today?"
18/20
Ukrainian Ambassador to Austria, Vasyl Khymynets, was later outraged by Wehrschütz's comments on Izium mass graves. He said that Russian war crimes could not be verified and added that "we should not forget about the media and information war."
19/20
Allegedly, Mr. Wehrschütz has hired a group of high-profile lawyers who are known to sue everyone in Austria he deems even a slight threat to his reputation as an "objective" reporter.
I'm not sure if spreading Kremlin propaganda helps his image as an objective journalist.
20/20
In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce an American far-right social media personality, Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes). He’s best-known for his white supremacist, misogynistic and antisemitic rhetoric, and for being the poster boy for the so-called incel movement.
1/17
Like so many from the white supremacist movement, Fuentes dropped out of university after his freshman year. He studied introductory international relations, which apparently made him a geopolitics expert. Nick was introduced to the white supremacist movement at an…
2/17
..early age - he took part in the infamous Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville,Virginia. In 2017, Fuentes launched his political talk show “America First”. Initially the show was aired on Trump-aligned Right Side Broadcasting Network, but it was dropped after the rally.
3/17
In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll discuss foreign malign influence operations during the 2024 US elections. As in 2016 and 2020, these recent elections were also a target of massive disinformation and hacking campaigns originating mostly from Russia and Iran.
1/17
First of all, my opinion is that these influence operations alone didn’t affect the elections so much, that they actually made a difference.
Unlike in 2016, Trump’s win over Harris was clear and these short-term campaigns didn’t really change that much this time.
2/17
Yet, many of these online campaigns attacked both Harris and Walz on various social media platforms. Especially Walz became a big target after his nomination, and many Russian efforts attempted to defame him.
In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce a social media personality and TV presenter, Raisa Blommestijn (@rblommestijn). She’s best-known for her far-right rhetorics, spreading conspiracy theories, and spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives on Dutch television.
1/24
Raisa studied philosophy of law at Leiden University. The faculty is best-known for one of its professors, Paul Cliteur. He’s a member of the pro-Kremlin party Forum voor Democratie (FvD), where he is one of the leading figures.Cliteur is also known for supervising the FvD…
2/24
…founder Thierry Baudet’s doctoral thesis, and can be considered a central figure in this Dutch “anti-establishment” movement. While studying at Leiden, Raise also met her best friend forever, Eva Vlaardingerbroek:
In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce an American podcaster, Darryl Cooper (@martyrmade). He’s best-known for “Martyr Made”, a history podcast that provides a strongly revisionist and biased analysis on historical events such as the Revolution of Dignity and World War II.
1/22
Darryl became known to big audiences in 2021, when he published a Twitter thread in which he basically described a massive conspiracy against Trump during both 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. The culprits were predictable: the corporate press, intelligence agencies…
2/22
…and of course the evil Democrats. To Darryl, Russia was not working together with the Trump campaign, even though there’s clear evidence that many of his officials - including Carter Page, Rex Tillerson, Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort - interacted intimately with…
In today’s #vatniksoup, I’m going to outline the current situation in the West’s information war against Russia & its allies. Currently,the West’s counter-disinformation measures are severely underfunded,making it difficult to combat Russian influence operations effectively.
1/17
Europe today is repeating the same mistake in information warfare that it made in conventional warfare: we are not dedicating enough resources to counter it. Just as Europe was unprepared to fully support Ukraine and prepare for kinetic warfare against Russia,...
2/17
...we have been neglecting information warfare. Next year, Russia is reportedly set to spend around 3 billion USD on its information operations domestically and abroad, with allies like the CCP, Iran, and North Korea likely following suit.
In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce an American conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation (@Heritage). Heritage is best-known for opposing military aid to Ukraine and for their political initiative called Project 2025, a potential blueprint for a Trump presidency.
1/23
Before we begin, I want to justify this soup that focuses heavily on US domestic politics. As a strong supporter of Ukraine, I see Donald Trump as a threat to Ukraine’s existence, and the reasoning for that can be found in this previous soup:
Heritage was founded in 1973, but it took a leading role in conservative politics during the Reagan presidency, whose policies were mostly taken from the foundation’s book series called Mandate for Leadership. Project 2025 is the ninth iteration of this series.