Aidan Comerford Profile picture
Aug 23 40 tweets 15 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Graham Linehan says he's "still waiting for an example" of his vile bullying behaviour.

Here's a non-exhaustive thread of Graham's vile bullying behaviour. 1/ Image
Katy Montgomerie is a trans woman and a feminist who calls out transphobia. Graham deadnames and misgenders her, calls her a crossdresser, portrays her as a child catcher. Posts pre transition pics of her. His YouTube cohost called her a pervert etc. 2/ Image
Graham refers to women who stand up to him as "handmaidens" and "traitors." He tags them in tweets, which directs his followers to similarly abuse them. Anyone who has been tagged in his tweets knows that the pile-on from this tagging is vile, unless you use a block list. 3/ Image
H from Steps stood up for trans rights and Graham started bullying him, so H used a block list to block this harassment, and Graham retaliated by writing a completely unevidenced defamatory thread saying that H was connected to a child rapist. How is that not vile bullying? 4/ Image
Graham doesn't restrict his vile bullying of women to women who support trans rights. If women on his side disagree with his bullying behaviour, he does this to them. He also said he called Helen Lewis and left a voicemail for her that he hopes "doesn't come back to bite him." 5/ Image
Graham regularly paints tweets that simply point out what he and his allies say as "disgusting" while abusing and defaming people in reply. He has written numerous blogs and made many videos personally targeting people in this way and worse. 5/ Image
Here's an example of the vile bullying blogs he writes about people who point out "gender criticism's" transphobia.

He lies (I never interacted with Berns or her family, let alone harassed) and says horrific personalised things about people in frankly frightening screeds. 6/


Image
Image
Image
Image
And if that doesn't work to shut people up, he also, in the background, issues legal threats to people. (After all this he attempted to sue ME for defamation.) He has said recently that he is using ChatGPT to "lighten the workload" of sending "legal-sounding" letters to people.7/
You may have noticed, Graham, like all classic bullies who never left the playground, loves to use the word "fat" as a pejorative, and posts pictures of people for mockery and fatshaming like this.

How is this not vile bullying behaviour? Denying it is Orwellian. 8/ Image
Graham regularly posts pictures of trans women for mockery saying things like "no surgery, just a bloke."

And, with no hint of irony, also posts pictures of trans people without consent who have had surgery calling it "mutilation." 9/
Image
Image
You may say that he isn't responsible for how his followers abuse people, except that he likes
their abusive tweets. Here's one calling Kirstie Allsop "mentally r*tarded" that he liked. He approves. This is how he wants his followers to bully people who support trans rights. 10/
Image
Image
Graham claims he came up with the term "ok groomer" (he didn't) and he regularly singles out trans rights supporters and calls them "groomers." Then he'll gaslight people claiming he doesn't mean it in the pedophilic sense, but he absolutely does, as evidenced here. 11/
Image
Image
His bugbear is that his Father Ted musical isn't going ahead. He makes videos like this about his former Father Ted musical colleagues, bullying them by name. In one of these videos he suggested Neil Hannon cares more animals than children, for example.
He'll say his musical was cancelled because he was just "standing up for women's rights" but the declaration he says he would force workers to sign to be "allowed" to work on his musical is a transphobic declaration. That's the sort of bullying authoritarian he is.
13/
Jackie Green is a 30 year old trans woman. She had surgery 14 years ago. She is simply living her life now. And yet Graham regularly posts tweets like this about her.
Consider the fact that Jackie's life has nothing at all to do with Graham. He's bullying her, relentlessly. 14/ Image
For years, Graham would share a video by trans woman Kristina Harrison as "proof" he wasn't transphobic.

However, Kristina said a cartoon by an ally of his was transphobic, so he had the cartoonist on his blog, and hosted vile, transphobic comments about Kristina like this. 15/
Image
Image
At the time, Kathleen Stock, a "gender critical" woman, stood up for Kristina (and another trans woman) so Graham wrote a blog calling Stock "the chamberlain of the gender wars" (seriously, these people) and accused her of endangering him, because he's also a crybully. 16/
Graham (and his allies and the media) will claim he is standing up for autistic kids who are being "transed" and yet he uses "autistic" as a pejorative, and as a word to slur people who stand to up him.

How is this not vile hypocrisy?

This is clearly bullying behaviour. 17/
Image
Image
It's not like any of this is new.
This is a tweet from five years ago.
This is who he is, & who he has always been. An abusive, angry bully, replying to reasonable questions like this. When the media say "gender critical beliefs" this is actually what " gender criticism" is. 18/ Image
The person who wrote this perfectly reasonable tweet is a survivor of CSA, but the "gender critical" movement ratioed this tweet, directed by Linehan calling the person a "groomer." That's what I mean when I say the abuse/bullying is directed from the top of the GC movement. 19/ Image
Here's another example of his bullying a trans woman, suggesting this trans woman became a paramedic to "fondle women."

(I often wonder what "gender critical" trans woman @KJ_Harrison thought of this relentless bullying and transphobia, as she works as a paramedic too.) 20/ Image
@KJ_Harrison A person went on a game show and identified as queer, and Graham posted their pictures, calling them homophobes. (Graham refers to bi (or pansexual) people currently in ostensibly "straight" relationships as "spicy straights" etc. You don't stop being bi (or pan) obviously.) 21/ Image
Graham is the sort of bully who thinks his loyalty in one situation should be repaid to him forever, in every situation, which led him to abuse a trans-supportive woman like this, saying she was tweeting "male-pandering shite" and was "giving away rights to men." 22/ Image
He goes after trans women who want to take part in women's sport with a zeal and hatred that goes way beyond any objection to them taking part in sport.

By the way: Putting trans women's names in inverted commas - "Emily" is very standard vile "gender critical" bullying. 23/
Image
Image
Seconds after an actor who is a staunch trans ally is announced in a Doctor Who role, completely seperate to trans rights, he is in with defamatory accusations, and implications that she is a homophobe. (Again, standard "gender critical" bullying to call people homophobes.) 24/ Image
Every time someone points out transphobia he bullies them with accusations of misogyny and homophobia.
(Aside: Marion's comment about "protecting women" is ironic now, as reportedly, she is under investigation for fraud, and one of her alleged victims might be a GC woman.) 25/
Image
Image
Every once in a while, one of his supporters will warn him to go easy on "dehumanising" trans women.
Here, he published a blog where he told one woman to "shut the f*ck up" at the end of it. And this is a woman who was his side. She has since stopped supporting him, obviously.26/
Image
Image
I've posted a few screenshots to his Substack, so I should pause to say that in a recent interview he said he has 3000 paying subscribers. That would be minimum 7500 quid a month, for bullying. However, almost all of the posts are by "JL" (Josephine Liptrott) an unpaid woman. 27/ Image
When some of his allies brought up the fact that he was profiting off the work of an unpaid woman, he said that he had offered her payment and she had refused, and what was he to do? But sit back and watch the money roll in while she does the majority of the actual work. 28/
Here are more examples his vile bullying, on the Twitter account @transpanicuk , which has lots more examples, any journalist can look whenever they are going to write a story about Linehan or the what "gender criticism" actually is.

Journalists are being obtuse, at best. 29/


Image
Image
Image
Image
@transpanicuk Just consider when you read a news story that says "he was cancelled for defending women," and put that claim against any of the examples of the actual words he speaks on this thread of on @transpanicuk.

By any measure he is a vile bully. There are 100s of examples of it. 30/
@transpanicuk He shouldn't be on @YouTube, @X, or @SubstackInc.
He has violated all of their supposed terms & conditions repeatedly, and yet they still platform his vile bullying & relentless hatred.
He seemingly can't help himself.
What is their excuse?
What will it take?
What price?
31/
@transpanicuk @YouTube @X @SubstackInc For the media to present this man who tells women *on his own side* to "shut the f*ck up" and would leave nasty messages on their phone if they dare criticise him as a "women's rights campaigner" is a dereliction of duty. You're excusing this bullying by platforming him. 32/
You might ask, reading all this, why no-one has sued him? Someone is currently taking proceedings agains him, and he wrote a crowdfunder which mispresents what the case is about, and raised 100K and counting from his followers to try to bully the person into stopping. 33/
He has, on video, spoken about how difficult he will make it for that person on the stand. Again, standard "gender criticism." They did it in defence of Marion Millar, where they promised to take a case of simple alleged harassment to the European court if it was pursued. 34/
Marion allegedly visited that person's workplace in the night, with a gang of "gender critical" people, and left threatening messages. If a trans supportive person did that to a GC person Graham would want them in front of the Hague. But when they do it it's not bullying? 35/
It's long past time for the media to get serious about the "gender critical" movement, and stop writing articles portraying Graham et al as "feminists" and "women's rights defenders." Graham is a leader in that movement because he's a bully and they are a bullying movement. 36/
Only the wilfully blind could read this thread and not grasp that what they are looking at is a leader in a hate movement who bullies trans people and advocates in the most vile ways he can imagine.

Let's finally get real about this. 37/37
@Rotshasa You can't engage with a mind that thinks things like that in any rational way. He has created demons in his head in order to justify himself. When you ask GCs for motive, you're likely to get a rant about "big pharma" and rich Jews "funding the EU trans lobby."
@Rotshasa Just a remindeer, these are people who saw a random Twitter glitch and built an entire unevidenced conspiracy theory that trans people in Twitter were deleting their likes to annoy them.

A sitting MP in the UK actually believes there's something to do that. Collective madness.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aidan Comerford

Aidan Comerford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AidanCTweets

Aug 19
I've seen two men recently defend Linehan by reducing his hatemongering to words like "rude," "unkind," and "uncivil." It's not merely "rude" to say, for example, that the fight for trans rights (or gay rights) is "grooming," as Linehan does, it *endangers* LGBTQ+ people.
.@NeilThin 's words here are a complete of the reality of the world we live in, which is a world where homophobia and transphobia exists, which physically endangers LGBT+ people. There is a marked rise in LGBTQ+ hate crimes, recently. Hateful rhetoric feeds into that endangement.
@NeilThin When you say that transphobia (or homophobia) is merely "rudeness" you seek to downplay that endangerment.

Obviosuly, if you go around saying the fight for trans rights is a "shitty, pedophilic movement" that you hope is "dead" soon, that encourages endangement.
Read 19 tweets
Aug 19
One of the "gender critical" accusations is that "TRAs" post porn in replies to JK Rowling.

I get porn in replies all the time; clearly pornbots.

Is it possible they are equating standard pornbot replies with "trans activism"?

Have you ever seen any examples of their claim?
Rowling herself made reference to it once: "I've ignored porn tweeted at children on a thread about their art."

Firstly, children aren't/shouldn't be on Twitter (Rowling herself referred to Twitter as a pub argument, so I doubt she would endorse children having accounts.)
Their parents were using their accounts to tweet art competition entries.

So, for the porn to be tweeted "at children," it would involve the parents seeing these alleged replies on their phones and then showing these replies to their children.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 13
Here is defacto "gender critical" leader, Posie Parker, saying she never agreed with @jk_rowling's "dress however you please" tweet:

"I thought, you dress, and we all receive the message, whatever it is you want to send...and if you deny that to be true, you're just a liar." 1/
We ironically refer to this as "the holy tweet." A "gender critical" conspiracy theory is that it would actually be the most liked tweet ever only that Twitter deleted their likes on it, so they regularly go back and re-like it. But is it really representative of GC thought? 2/ Image
"Gender critical" people are generally highly judgemental of people's clothes and looks. They love to post people's pictures for mockery. There is a huge amount of fatshaming and endorsement of fatshaming in their movement. They think calling people "fat" is hilarious. 3/
Read 24 tweets
Jul 23
Last week, "gender critical" lesbians found out that their allies wanted to remove "non-biological" lesbians from their kid's birth certs. We said marriage equality would be next. Right on cue, here's GC Harry Miller of @WeAreFairCop on the "Coalition For Marriage" Youtube. 1/ Image
Who are "Coalition For Marriage"?

"The Coalition for Marriage is Britain’s leading campaign group supporting traditional marriage which is between a man and a woman, to the exclusion of all others and for life."

Are you getting it yet? It's time to defend your rights. 2/ Image
Now, I know that you hate us. While we have diligently told you for years that they would use opposition to trans rights as wedge to attack LGB rights, your (mostly) straight allies have been telling you that we are the devil incarnate: paedophiles, groomers, misogynists etc. 3/
Read 30 tweets
Jul 21
Almost a year ago, @PogustGoodhead announced they would file legal action against the Tavistock within months, expecting "1000 families" (sic) to join.

Now, even online critics of trans healthcare, like @JenniferLahl, are beginning to wonder about the status of this action? 1/ Image
I'm not sure why Jennifer is tagging her online allies, and not the legal firm involved? Isn't it incredible, though, so many mainstream media journalists, like @kvittozzi from @skynews, reported this at the time, and AFAIK, not a single news org has done a followup story. 2/ Image
At the time, countless trans supportive people on Twitter said this was nothing more than the announcement of a legal fishing expedition with no evidence of a single client let alone 1000. And yet in the minds, and out of the mouths, of the "gender critical" it became Truth. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Jul 20
Yesterday, I wrote a thread about a UK "gender critical" lesbian who was willing to give up her wife's right to be on their child's birth cert because the GC movement largely agree with Italian lesbians being stripped of that right, currently. Here are the GC counterarguments. 1/


Image
Image
Image
Image
And it's been like this for years. A bunch of radicalised people who are only capable of responding with nasty, defamatory ad hominem. This is directed from the top. They don't bother with counterarguments, because it's all about demonising anyone who supports trans rights. 2/


Image
Image
Image
Image
On and on and on like this.

Again, no-one actually addressing the points, no-one defending lesbian rights, just an online mob defaming, slurring and abusing.

This is all that the GC movement actually is, and has ever been. 3/


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(