One of the best pieces every published in The Atlantic is this 97-year-old piece by "A Woman Resident in Russia".
In it, she described the chaos that resulted when Communists destroyed the institution of marriage.
Let's read about what happened when Soviets ruined marriage🧵
"To clear the family out of the accumulated dust of the ages we had to give it a good shakeup, and we did."
Russia boasted it had no illegitimate children. True. They eliminated the "illegitimate" category.
"Men took to changing wives" and 300,000 abandoned children resulted.
"It was not... unusual... for a boy of twenty to have had three or four wives, or for a girl of the same age to have had three or four abortions."
"I recall another victim of the breakdown of families ties.... She was divorced by her husband after their first child was born. He then married another woman, had a child by her, deserted both, and returned to his first wife, by whom he had a second child."
Not all women suffered from the breakdown. Some exploited it.
"Women of light behavior" would blackmail men into paying alimony.
Some men found ways to profit from this as well.
They would trick a woman into marriage, use her as an employee on the farm, and then divorce her when the season was through.
It wasn't just rural areas that buckled under the effects of marriage dissolution.
One group of students became indignant at accusations of licentiousness and declared that having sex was the only real amusement left, so they deserved free abortions.
Some chapters of the League of Communist Youth decried people who wouldn't do hook-ups and even organized circles to encourage free loving.
The Communists were ideologically committed to the idea that the state should rear the children.
This proved too expensive, so this "annoying test of Communist theories" could be given a failing grade.
The debates over a new, free-love abiding law took place in the Tsar's throneroom, with its gilded walls and vaulted ceilings, and the throne, replaced with a simple wooden platform.
The opposition to the law suggested it would abolish marriage, destroy the family, legalize polygamy, and ruin the peasantry.
Trotsky and Soltz offered contradictory explanations for their positions.
Smidovich and Kollontai provided their own opinions as well.
Kollontai wanted a social insurance scheme, like a sovereign fund for abandoned kids. Incidentally, she was the ambassador to Norway.
"If opinion on the proposed law is divided in the cities, the feeling in the villages, where eighty per cent of the Russians live, is overwhelmingly against it."
Here's what one peasant spokesman had to say:
"The... circulation of revolutionary ideas on the desirability of abolishing the family has not... eliminated old-fashioned passions of love and jealousy."
"Even Communist women have been known to commit suicide because their husbands' attentions were diverted elsewhere."
The Soviets eventually did crack down. Free love could not last, and this brief experiment in it led them to abandon attempts to bring it about.
The Communists simply couldn't uproot human nature.
President Trump just sent a hugely important memo to all agency heads.
It instructs them to inform courts filing injunctions against them that, per the law, plaintiffs have to post a security equal to the potential costs of the injunction to the Federal Government.
So, if you, a plaintiff demand the government make good on a payment of $2 billion that they were going to cancel, you must post $2 billion, just in case it's later found that the injunction was wrongful.
This means the injunctions will stop.
Activists groups are trying to get injunctions against the government to force massive payments to continue.
They will lose many of these battles, but now the battles probably won't even take place in most cases, because these securities are enormous and they won't make them.
On the right, you can see states with policies that give schools more money when their students are diagnosed with autism.
When these policies pass, autism diagnoses increase by almost 25%!
Incentives really do matter for autism diagnoses.
For example, people on SSI receive larger payouts if they're diagnosed with autism.
After the economic downturn in 2008, the most heavily impacted age group started getting diagnosed with autism at an incredible rate:
Similarly, because laws in many places mandate providing more resources to autistic children, parents have sought to get their mentally retarded children diagnosed as autistic.
Using California as an example, more than a quarter of the rise 1992-2005 was due to this:
During Bernie's second set of questions in today's Senate confirmation hearing, @DrJBhattacharya came very close to describing the U.K.'s RECOVERY trial and arguing that the U.S. should emulate that sort of pragmatic clinical trial.
Bernie cut him off, but he shouldn't have🧵
The RECOVERY Trial was the in-patient equivalent to the community-level PRINCIPLE Trial.
Both were trials run in the U.K. to figure out what works for keeping people off of serious treatments like ventilators and out of the morgue after they've been infected with COVID-19.
RECOVERY was an amazing success, but it can't be done in the U.S., because America's healthcare resources are not aligned like they are in the U.K.
In Britain, the NHS and the country's death index (how deaths are tracked) enable people to be easily signed up and tracked.