One of the best pieces every published in The Atlantic is this 97-year-old piece by "A Woman Resident in Russia".
In it, she described the chaos that resulted when Communists destroyed the institution of marriage.
Let's read about what happened when Soviets ruined marriage🧵
"To clear the family out of the accumulated dust of the ages we had to give it a good shakeup, and we did."
Russia boasted it had no illegitimate children. True. They eliminated the "illegitimate" category.
"Men took to changing wives" and 300,000 abandoned children resulted.
"It was not... unusual... for a boy of twenty to have had three or four wives, or for a girl of the same age to have had three or four abortions."
"I recall another victim of the breakdown of families ties.... She was divorced by her husband after their first child was born. He then married another woman, had a child by her, deserted both, and returned to his first wife, by whom he had a second child."
Not all women suffered from the breakdown. Some exploited it.
"Women of light behavior" would blackmail men into paying alimony.
Some men found ways to profit from this as well.
They would trick a woman into marriage, use her as an employee on the farm, and then divorce her when the season was through.
It wasn't just rural areas that buckled under the effects of marriage dissolution.
One group of students became indignant at accusations of licentiousness and declared that having sex was the only real amusement left, so they deserved free abortions.
Some chapters of the League of Communist Youth decried people who wouldn't do hook-ups and even organized circles to encourage free loving.
The Communists were ideologically committed to the idea that the state should rear the children.
This proved too expensive, so this "annoying test of Communist theories" could be given a failing grade.
The debates over a new, free-love abiding law took place in the Tsar's throneroom, with its gilded walls and vaulted ceilings, and the throne, replaced with a simple wooden platform.
The opposition to the law suggested it would abolish marriage, destroy the family, legalize polygamy, and ruin the peasantry.
Trotsky and Soltz offered contradictory explanations for their positions.
Smidovich and Kollontai provided their own opinions as well.
Kollontai wanted a social insurance scheme, like a sovereign fund for abandoned kids. Incidentally, she was the ambassador to Norway.
"If opinion on the proposed law is divided in the cities, the feeling in the villages, where eighty per cent of the Russians live, is overwhelmingly against it."
Here's what one peasant spokesman had to say:
"The... circulation of revolutionary ideas on the desirability of abolishing the family has not... eliminated old-fashioned passions of love and jealousy."
"Even Communist women have been known to commit suicide because their husbands' attentions were diverted elsewhere."
The Soviets eventually did crack down. Free love could not last, and this brief experiment in it led them to abandon attempts to bring it about.
The Communists simply couldn't uproot human nature.
The Trump administration has officially taken a stance against debanking.
That means that, soon enough, no more Americans will be deprived of being able to hold a bank account because of the opinions they hold.
Americans will be free to think independently again🧵
The executive order begins with some background:
Americans, often at the behest of government officials, have been subject to the loss of access to financial services.
That often meant having no access to bank accounts, debit and credit cards, investment tools, and so on.
And then it gets to the meat:
We want to stop this, because it is anti-freedom.
Financial institutions should not be able to stop Americans from holding whatever views they want to. It's not their business, so they're being asked to stay out of it.
There's been a long COVID-related rise in self-reported disability.
Notice how the rise starting in mid-2020 mostly has to do with an increase in difficulty remembering things?
That's the brain fog symptom everyone became aware of.
Importantly, in both the ACS—which lacks specific long COVID questions—and in the Household Pulse Survey—which added them in 2022—there's a curious demographic concentration of, first, new disability, and second, long COVID reports:
Young, female, Hispanic, and poorly-educated.
The timeline for long COVID as a meme is basically:
Spring/Summer 2020: Patient groups, the media mainstream the idea. Survivor Corps, Body Politic, NYT articles, Mount Sinai's dedicated post-COVID clinic, Ed Yong's Atlantic article.
One-in-two has a disability and/or a traumatic brain injury. One-in-five has psychosis. One-in-ten is schizophrenic. One-in-four is just straight-up mentally retarded.
These facts have major consequences.
As I noted recently, the White House wants to bring back involuntary commitment.
They're probably in the right to call for that, since so many homeless are incapable of taking care of themselves, or at the very least, not hurting others.
Some people are mentally downtrodden because of injuries to the head.
Among the homeless, over half have suffered a TBI, compared to 12% of Americans. Just over 20% have a TBI-related disability, compared to about 2% of Americans.