One of the best pieces every published in The Atlantic is this 97-year-old piece by "A Woman Resident in Russia".
In it, she described the chaos that resulted when Communists destroyed the institution of marriage.
Let's read about what happened when Soviets ruined marriage🧵
"To clear the family out of the accumulated dust of the ages we had to give it a good shakeup, and we did."
Russia boasted it had no illegitimate children. True. They eliminated the "illegitimate" category.
"Men took to changing wives" and 300,000 abandoned children resulted.
"It was not... unusual... for a boy of twenty to have had three or four wives, or for a girl of the same age to have had three or four abortions."
"I recall another victim of the breakdown of families ties.... She was divorced by her husband after their first child was born. He then married another woman, had a child by her, deserted both, and returned to his first wife, by whom he had a second child."
Not all women suffered from the breakdown. Some exploited it.
"Women of light behavior" would blackmail men into paying alimony.
Some men found ways to profit from this as well.
They would trick a woman into marriage, use her as an employee on the farm, and then divorce her when the season was through.
It wasn't just rural areas that buckled under the effects of marriage dissolution.
One group of students became indignant at accusations of licentiousness and declared that having sex was the only real amusement left, so they deserved free abortions.
Some chapters of the League of Communist Youth decried people who wouldn't do hook-ups and even organized circles to encourage free loving.
The Communists were ideologically committed to the idea that the state should rear the children.
This proved too expensive, so this "annoying test of Communist theories" could be given a failing grade.
The debates over a new, free-love abiding law took place in the Tsar's throneroom, with its gilded walls and vaulted ceilings, and the throne, replaced with a simple wooden platform.
The opposition to the law suggested it would abolish marriage, destroy the family, legalize polygamy, and ruin the peasantry.
Trotsky and Soltz offered contradictory explanations for their positions.
Smidovich and Kollontai provided their own opinions as well.
Kollontai wanted a social insurance scheme, like a sovereign fund for abandoned kids. Incidentally, she was the ambassador to Norway.
"If opinion on the proposed law is divided in the cities, the feeling in the villages, where eighty per cent of the Russians live, is overwhelmingly against it."
Here's what one peasant spokesman had to say:
"The... circulation of revolutionary ideas on the desirability of abolishing the family has not... eliminated old-fashioned passions of love and jealousy."
"Even Communist women have been known to commit suicide because their husbands' attentions were diverted elsewhere."
The Soviets eventually did crack down. Free love could not last, and this brief experiment in it led them to abandon attempts to bring it about.
The Communists simply couldn't uproot human nature.
Compared to twenty years ago, kids are eating some types of ultraprocessed foods more and some types less🧵
For example, one thing there's proportionally less of is sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Meanwhile, there's relatively greater sweet snack consumption.
Overall, the ultraprocessed food (UPF) consumption share is up across young ages to similar degrees.
The increase is definitely there, but it isn't dramatic. For example, going from 61% to 67.5% is an 11% increase in twenty years.
The increase in consumption is not differentiated by the sex of children.
In other words, boys and girls are both eating a bit more ultraprocessed food.
People tend to understand it as an indication that earlier generations were a lot less intelligent than we moderns.
Or if they're read up on the literature, they now think things are reversing.
Both are wrong! Take a look at this chart of Norwegian data:
If you don't understand what those tests are like, here are some example questions:
What we see over time with the Flynn Effect (the increase in IQ scores) and the Reverse Flynn Effect (the more recent decrease in IQ scores) is that both are due to something really boring: people interpreting tests differently than they used to.
The study took place in Germany and was centered on the experiences of 107 people aged 21-40 who lived alone and had earnings between €1,100 and €2,600 per month.
The experiment provided them with €1,200 per month for three full years.
Controls (N = 1,580) earned €10 for sticking with the program and another €30 if they made it the whole way.
There was no attrition in the treatment group, but 29% of the control group dropped out by the end of the study.
Many women have found that they get pregnant more easily after getting on GLP-1 drugs.
But women aren't the only ones noticing improved fertility:
There's now clinical trial evidence that GLP-1s improve sperm parameters.
The largest clinical trial published so far on this subject came out in 2023. It involved 110 men aged 18-35 with metabolic hypogonadism being sorted into one of three conditions:
A: The group seeking fatherhood.
B: The group not seeking fatherhood.
C: The group of already-dads.
The men in Group A were explicitly given the fertility drugs urofollitropin three times a week and human chorionic gonadotropin twice a week.