Thread by @ConceptualJames

The other night at an event in Georgia, I got asked where the "courageous CEOs" are, who would stand against Woke, esp. in the corporate world. It's easy to lay a lot of the blame for CEO risk aversion at the feet of the ESG cartel, legitimately, but it's only half the story.

It's actually easy enough to explain why, but I'm going to back that up out of Klaus Schwab's latest WEF manifesto too, Ze Great Narrative For a Better Future. We'll come back to how this is an organized strategy to control corporations and CEOs after explaining it.

Ze ESG environment is half the story for the seeming lack of corporate courage. That's top-down power, and there's a lot of leverage on them there, to the point where there's a tortured but serious argument that playing ESG ball is necessary for fiduciary responsibility.

The logic there is that you can't maximize shareholder value (fiduciary duty) in the ESG economy unless you play ball with ESG. That's obviously cartel logic that operates in a financial racketeering environment that's probably illegal, but it's a lot of leverage.

The top-down ESG cartel logic is probably actually less influential than the bottom-up timebomb the unambiguously Western Maoist sociocultural environment sets up, at least so far as CEO constraints and behavior goes. CEOs are afraid of their employees more than anyone else.

I want to clarify that this isn't just HR doing Woke HR stuff. It also isn't just the exposure bad jurisprudence on Civil Rights law establishes for them, though both of these matter. The real fear is internal employee mutiny that can make daily operations virtually impossible.

Mutinous employees not only create challenging and ineffective working environments and can grind operations effectively toward a halt, they will also betray you (remember: Maoism). They can leak secrets or wild allegations to a hostile media, for example.

Why should CEOs fear their employees, though? Here's how it works. Here's the power of American Maoism.

Your company becomes a target for the Woke Eye of Sauron for whatever reason, and the media starts doing stories to expose you and put pressure on you. This can be bad.

The main target of this relentless bad PR (propaganda) against you from the media isn't you or even your customers (though them too). It's your employees, their friends, and their families. They want people in their personal lives to shame them for working at your company.

You can probably hold out against a lot of external pressure so long as you're internally strong, even an angry customer boycott or supplier issues. You cannot weather this storm if you are internally brittle or in turmoil, and shame-filled employees will give you that.

By mobilizing the propaganda media, which is very much like being in the beam of the Eye of Sauron, against your company, some of your employees will feel ashamed. They and others will report getting immense pressure from their friends and families to quit, or else.

The infectious dynamic of the struggle session is now operant against your company. The media hammers you from the outside, and the bad press puts your employees in a position of shame for working for you, especially with their closest personal relations. They pass that to you.

The struggle session pressure builds up internally from them, forcing you in a no-win situation in which you have to do *something* to try to alleviate the pressure, but anything you do will be taken by the propaganda machine as a confession and increase the struggle session.

As pressure mounts from the outside and discord grows internally, your institution is put in a situation it can scarcely survive. So long as the Maoist false morality rules the social environment, they can use the propaganda media like a Death Star beam to blow up your org.

But this nasty weapon isn't just happening. The WEF bosses understand it. This is STAKEHOLDER Capitalism: "...but they’ll [businesses] be forced to commit to ESG and, ultimately, all the commitments will be put to the test by government action and societal pressure."

See, under Stakeholder Capitalism, the government and the ESG-compliant business community will put enormous (top-down) pressure on corporations to comply. "Stakeholder capitalism welcomes the idea of legislative action" to direct the nature of doing business.

But any reluctant or resistant CEOs will face the "wrath of activists, both social and investors" to "accelerate the pace at which companies embrace stakeholder value and will 'force' the reluctant ones to convert to the cause."

A public-private partnership is the only way to proceed through a WEF-coordinated and defined "global corporate citizenship" model that has been at the forefront of WEF objectives for decades. All of this must take place under "stakeholder responsibility" (socialist discipline).

This "global corporate citizenship" model is "an absolute necessity" because "companies depend on the natural and social ecosystem in which they operate" (just like Marx insisted with his idea of "metabolism"). The old model is "outdated." *Employees* will help force the change.

So, there's enormous pressure (top-down, bottom-up, and inside-out) on corporations and other institutions to become fully ESG (thus SDG) compliant, and internal pressures from employees put through struggle sessions driven by propaganda operations are a huge factor, on purpose.