/1🚨BREAKING — We obtained new docs from our lawsuit against the National Archives revealing over 1,000 emails between Rosemont Seneca and the Office of Vice President.
See how Hunter’s private business dealings commingled with the official business of the Obama White House. ⤵️
/2 The sheer volume of emails exchanged between Hunter and his associates at Rosemont Seneca and the Office of the Vice President is telling in itself.
/3 Just since AFL’s last release, NARA has processed another 861 emails sent or received between January 2011 and December 2013 that contained the name of Hunter Biden’s company — “Rosemont Seneca.”
/4 The vast majority of these emails consisted of direct communications between Rosemont Seneca employees, including Hunter Biden, and the Office of the Vice President.
/5 Contrary to Joe Biden’s claim that there is an “absolute wall between the personal and private, and the government,” the White House asserted executive privilege to withhold 200 emails in their entirety because “Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors.”
/6 Emails obtained by AFL reveal the broad access Hunter Biden enjoyed to the official government channels while his father was Vice President. Below are just a few examples of how Hunter Biden had free reign in directing the use of official government resources…keep reading.
/7 Even though Hunter had no official role in the Obama-Biden Administration, he was intimately involved in planning for high-profile White House events, including the January 2011 China State Luncheon, the June 2011 State Arrival Ceremony for German Chancellor, the March 2012 United Kingdom State Dinner and Visit, the May 2013 Turkey State Luncheon, and the 2014 France State Dinner.
/8 As our investigation has previously uncovered, Hunter and his Rosemont Seneca business partner had been planning for the “China Lunch” months in advance. freebeacon.com/biden-administ…
/9 Hunter Biden and his associates at Rosemont Seneca also frequently used the Biden name to gain access to the White House…
/10 On December 18, 2013, lobbyist Doug Davenport reached out to Hunter’s business partner, Eric Schwerin, for last-minute tickets for a Christmas White House tour for his “guy from Apple.”
Even those familiar with Rosemont Seneca knew that they had unmatched access to the Obama-Biden White House.
/11 Even though Eric Schwerin had no official government position, our investigation previously revealed the degree to which he intimately involved himself with official White House business and used the Biden name to gain unfettered access to the White House.

/12 Eric Schwerin told Davenport that the only way a tour would be possible would be to get them to “the front of the line.”
/13 Rosemont Seneca then directly contacted the Office of the Vice President to confirm the last-minute Christmas tour as a “Big favor for Hunter,” indicating that Hunter was using his access to the White House to benefit those involved with Rosemont Seneca.
/14 On another occasion, Hunter asked specifically for a White House tour for his business associate at Third Point.
Hunter and his associates were invested with Third Point, a hedge fund founded by Democratic billionaire donor Dan Loeb.
/15 Emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop revealed that they were helping Dan Loeb and Third Point raise billions of dollars from China’s sovereign wealth fund, CIC.
/16 Hunter also frequently requested official correspondence from the Office of the Vice President and involved his Rosemont Seneca team…keep reading.
/17 The Rosemont Seneca team, at Hunter’s direction, reached out to the OVP correspondence director to obtain a letter for an associate. During this exchange, Hunter’s assistant at Rosemont Seneca welcomes the new White House staffer “to the team.”
/18 These records further confirm that there was never a wall between the Office of the Vice President and Hunter Biden; in fact, there was extensive commingling between them.
/19 America First Legal will continue to share findings with the public through documents obtained from litigation against the National Archives. aflegal.org/new-hunter-bid…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
EXPOSED — DOJ indicted Fauci’s senior adviser David Morens for conspiracy and destroying COVID-era records.
But who were his alleged co-conspirators?
A tight network using secret Gmail accounts to dodge FOIA, revive a Wuhan-linked grant, and control the COVID origins story.
đź§µ
/2 After Congress exposed Morens’ emails, AFL launched a multi-front attack — demanding the Office of Special Counsel, the HHS Inspector General, and the Archivist of the United States investigate, recover unlawfully removed records, and coordinate with DOJ for potential prosecution.
We then sued Biden’s HHS for hiding records.
/3 While the American people were demanding answers about COVID origins, Dr. Morens deliberately moved official government business to his private email to evade FOIA.
This was no lapse in judgment.
It was a coordinated scheme at the highest levels to conceal the truth from the American people.
EXPOSED: @AnthropicAI says it is working to combat “extremist content.”
Anthropic appears to have relied on a network of SPLC-linked, Biden DHS-funded groups that target so-called “right-wing extremism” to influence its AI.
/2 Anthropic, the architect of Claude AI, has publicly committed to “mitigat[ing] extremist content risks.”
Our research shows that Anthroic’s approach appears to rely heavily on organizations run, funded, or influenced by key players tied to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
/3 One of Anthropic’s partners is the Global Project Against Hate & Extremism, or GPAHE.
GPAHE was co-founded by two longtime “veterans of the SPLC”:
➡️Heidi Beirich, former SPLC Intelligence Project Director
➡️Wendy Via, former SPLC Chief Communications & Development Officer
🚨EXPOSED — AFL has uncovered new documents revealing that Cook County, Illinois, released HUNDREDS of criminal illegal aliens onto American streets in 2025.
/2 @JudiciaryGOP recently exposed the Biden-era release of a criminal alien who murdered Loyola University student Sheridan Gorman in Chicago.
Apprehended at the border in 2023 and flagged as “likely to abscond,” the alien was freed just two weeks later.
@JudiciaryGOP /3 AFL is investigating jurisdictions’ compliance with ICE detainers — requests from ICE to hold an alien already in police or county custody until ICE can arrive.
Put simply, all the jurisdiction has to do is NOT RELEASE the alien.
AFL has revealed that Anthropic prioritizes DEI hires, who then go on to mold AI models in their image.
Numerous Anthropic recruiters pledge allegiance to DEI.
đź§µ
/2 Anthropic’s job postings make clear that DEI is running the show.
The postings acknowledge that Anthropic’s AI products have “enormous social and ethical implications” and prioritize “underrepresented groups” and “representation” for jobs paying $350,000-$850,000 per year.
/3 DEI professionals are calling the shots on Anthropic’s hiring teams.
One employee, Teeona Mayberry describes herself as a TALENT / DEI WARRIOR at Anthropic.
Her LinkedIn bio details her “particular focus on historically underrepresented groups.”
DOJ just unsealed an 11-count indictment against the SPLC for allegedly funneling MILLIONS to individuals linked to the Ku Klux Klan and other extremist groups.
The same SPLC that AFL exposed worked with Biden’s DOJ to TRAIN federal prosecutors on prosecuting hate crimes.
đź§µ
/2 AFL uncovered documents revealing the SPLC helped lead a “hate crimes symposium” for federal prosecutors at the invitation of Biden’s DOJ.
/1🚨UNCOVERED — Internal documents show that Oregon officials knew they lacked cause to sue the Trump Administration over its new regulations intended to prevent illegal aliens from receiving welfare.
They filed the lawsuit anyway.
/2 On July 21, 2025, twenty states and the District of Columbia sued the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies, alleging that providing legal residency status verification to the federal government would cause irreparable harm.
/3 In their lawsuit, the plaintiff states allege that they would be harmed by having to “dramatically restructure” their welfare programs.