/1🚨BREAKING — We obtained new docs from our lawsuit against the National Archives revealing over 1,000 emails between Rosemont Seneca and the Office of Vice President.
See how Hunter’s private business dealings commingled with the official business of the Obama White House. ⤵️
/2 The sheer volume of emails exchanged between Hunter and his associates at Rosemont Seneca and the Office of the Vice President is telling in itself.
/3 Just since AFL’s last release, NARA has processed another 861 emails sent or received between January 2011 and December 2013 that contained the name of Hunter Biden’s company — “Rosemont Seneca.”
/4 The vast majority of these emails consisted of direct communications between Rosemont Seneca employees, including Hunter Biden, and the Office of the Vice President.
/5 Contrary to Joe Biden’s claim that there is an “absolute wall between the personal and private, and the government,” the White House asserted executive privilege to withhold 200 emails in their entirety because “Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors.”
/6 Emails obtained by AFL reveal the broad access Hunter Biden enjoyed to the official government channels while his father was Vice President. Below are just a few examples of how Hunter Biden had free reign in directing the use of official government resources…keep reading.
/7 Even though Hunter had no official role in the Obama-Biden Administration, he was intimately involved in planning for high-profile White House events, including the January 2011 China State Luncheon, the June 2011 State Arrival Ceremony for German Chancellor, the March 2012 United Kingdom State Dinner and Visit, the May 2013 Turkey State Luncheon, and the 2014 France State Dinner.
/8 As our investigation has previously uncovered, Hunter and his Rosemont Seneca business partner had been planning for the “China Lunch” months in advance. freebeacon.com/biden-administ…
/9 Hunter Biden and his associates at Rosemont Seneca also frequently used the Biden name to gain access to the White House…
/10 On December 18, 2013, lobbyist Doug Davenport reached out to Hunter’s business partner, Eric Schwerin, for last-minute tickets for a Christmas White House tour for his “guy from Apple.”
Even those familiar with Rosemont Seneca knew that they had unmatched access to the Obama-Biden White House.
/11 Even though Eric Schwerin had no official government position, our investigation previously revealed the degree to which he intimately involved himself with official White House business and used the Biden name to gain unfettered access to the White House.

/12 Eric Schwerin told Davenport that the only way a tour would be possible would be to get them to “the front of the line.”
/13 Rosemont Seneca then directly contacted the Office of the Vice President to confirm the last-minute Christmas tour as a “Big favor for Hunter,” indicating that Hunter was using his access to the White House to benefit those involved with Rosemont Seneca.
/14 On another occasion, Hunter asked specifically for a White House tour for his business associate at Third Point.
Hunter and his associates were invested with Third Point, a hedge fund founded by Democratic billionaire donor Dan Loeb.
/15 Emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop revealed that they were helping Dan Loeb and Third Point raise billions of dollars from China’s sovereign wealth fund, CIC.
/16 Hunter also frequently requested official correspondence from the Office of the Vice President and involved his Rosemont Seneca team…keep reading.
/17 The Rosemont Seneca team, at Hunter’s direction, reached out to the OVP correspondence director to obtain a letter for an associate. During this exchange, Hunter’s assistant at Rosemont Seneca welcomes the new White House staffer “to the team.”
/18 These records further confirm that there was never a wall between the Office of the Vice President and Hunter Biden; in fact, there was extensive commingling between them.
/19 America First Legal will continue to share findings with the public through documents obtained from litigation against the National Archives. aflegal.org/new-hunter-bid…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We obtained new docs from the Brennan-Clapper DHS intel group revealing the Biden admin developed a classified plan to expand monitoring of political dissent.
#DeepStateDiaries PART 5:
/2 Today, we are releasing the fifth tranche of internal files from the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group,” obtained exclusively through our litigation with @RichardGrenell against the Biden DHS:
We just filed a SCOTUS brief on behalf of @HouseAdmin Subcommittee on Oversight Chairman @RepLoudermilk to support Stephen Bannon’s emergency stay application.
The brief argues that the partisan January 6 committee was illegal and invalid from inception:
/2 @RepLoudermilk and his subcommittee are investigating the numerous security failures leading up to and on January 6, 2021, and reviewing the creation, operation, and results of the partisan Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.
/3 It is settled law that Congress must follow its own rules.
Consequently, AFL and @RepLoudermilk argue that the Select Committee’s blatant noncompliance with House rules and resolutions means that it was unlawfully constituted and that both its subpoena to Mr. Bannon and the subsequent criminal referral that led to his convictions are invalid.
We just filed a bar complaint against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg for violating the New York Rules of Professional Conduct by engaging in illegal DEI practices such as:
🚨Recruiting, hiring, and retaining staff based on race and sex.
THREAD:
/2 We just filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance Committee (the Committee) of the First Judicial Department in New York requesting the Committee investigate Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his colleagues in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (the Office) for violating the New York Rules of Professional Conduct by engaging in illegal discriminatory practices.
/3 Rule 8.4(g)(1) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits lawyers and firms (including government firms) from engaging in “unlawful discrimination,” which is classified as “misconduct.”
Biden’s DHS intel group uses the phrase "quietly making democracy work" to describe their mission of combatting the "domestic terror threat" of Trump supporters in order to “rebuild faith in the federal government.”
#DeepStateDiaries PART 4:
/2 Today, we are releasing the fourth tranche of internal files from the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group,” obtained exclusively through our litigation with @RichardGrenell against the Biden DHS:
/3 Today’s release shows how the Brennan-Clapper intel committee admits the existence of a Deep State that works “quietly” to “make democracy work” in the face of “domestic terrorism threats,” or in their eyes – “supporters of the former president.”
Biden is giving registration forms and social security numbers to illegals.
America First Legal is sending an urgent ACTION PLAN to officials in all 50 states on how to stop illegals & non-citizens from voting.
States must ensure only citizens vote.
/2 We sent a letter to the chief election official of all 50 States, with a copy to each Governor and Attorney General explaining how they can use two key existing federal laws to obtain information from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security about the citizenship or immigration status of any individual for “any purpose authorized by law.”
/3 Given the unprecedented amount of illegal immigration that the United States has experienced since January 20, 2021 under Joe Biden, with millions upon millions of illegal aliens coming into the interior of the United States–and widespread concerns about the presence of aliens on voter rolls, the time is now for responsible election officials to do everything that they can under existing law to protect the integrity of upcoming elections.
Docs show Biden’s DHS intel group used Jan. 6 & the Mar-a-Lago raid to justify expanding surveillance of political dissent.
The group advocated for “collection based on speech” — as in spying on Americans for criticizing their gov’t.
#DeepStateDiaries PART 3:
/2 Today, we are releasing the third tranche of internal files from the “Homeland Intelligence Experts Group,” obtained exclusively through our litigation with @RichardGrenell against the Biden DHS:
One group member noted that “prior to January 6th” (i.e., under the Trump administration), analysts thought that “it was inappropriate to collect” intelligence on Americans.
Following January 6, however, they observed that there had been a change in collection and reporting methods.