/1🚨BREAKING — We obtained new docs from our lawsuit against the National Archives revealing over 1,000 emails between Rosemont Seneca and the Office of Vice President.
See how Hunter’s private business dealings commingled with the official business of the Obama White House. ⤵️
/2 The sheer volume of emails exchanged between Hunter and his associates at Rosemont Seneca and the Office of the Vice President is telling in itself.
/3 Just since AFL’s last release, NARA has processed another 861 emails sent or received between January 2011 and December 2013 that contained the name of Hunter Biden’s company — “Rosemont Seneca.”
/4 The vast majority of these emails consisted of direct communications between Rosemont Seneca employees, including Hunter Biden, and the Office of the Vice President.
/5 Contrary to Joe Biden’s claim that there is an “absolute wall between the personal and private, and the government,” the White House asserted executive privilege to withhold 200 emails in their entirety because “Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors.”
/6 Emails obtained by AFL reveal the broad access Hunter Biden enjoyed to the official government channels while his father was Vice President. Below are just a few examples of how Hunter Biden had free reign in directing the use of official government resources…keep reading.
/7 Even though Hunter had no official role in the Obama-Biden Administration, he was intimately involved in planning for high-profile White House events, including the January 2011 China State Luncheon, the June 2011 State Arrival Ceremony for German Chancellor, the March 2012 United Kingdom State Dinner and Visit, the May 2013 Turkey State Luncheon, and the 2014 France State Dinner.
/8 As our investigation has previously uncovered, Hunter and his Rosemont Seneca business partner had been planning for the “China Lunch” months in advance. freebeacon.com/biden-administ…
/9 Hunter Biden and his associates at Rosemont Seneca also frequently used the Biden name to gain access to the White House…
/10 On December 18, 2013, lobbyist Doug Davenport reached out to Hunter’s business partner, Eric Schwerin, for last-minute tickets for a Christmas White House tour for his “guy from Apple.”
Even those familiar with Rosemont Seneca knew that they had unmatched access to the Obama-Biden White House.
/11 Even though Eric Schwerin had no official government position, our investigation previously revealed the degree to which he intimately involved himself with official White House business and used the Biden name to gain unfettered access to the White House.

/12 Eric Schwerin told Davenport that the only way a tour would be possible would be to get them to “the front of the line.”
/13 Rosemont Seneca then directly contacted the Office of the Vice President to confirm the last-minute Christmas tour as a “Big favor for Hunter,” indicating that Hunter was using his access to the White House to benefit those involved with Rosemont Seneca.
/14 On another occasion, Hunter asked specifically for a White House tour for his business associate at Third Point.
Hunter and his associates were invested with Third Point, a hedge fund founded by Democratic billionaire donor Dan Loeb.
/15 Emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop revealed that they were helping Dan Loeb and Third Point raise billions of dollars from China’s sovereign wealth fund, CIC.
/16 Hunter also frequently requested official correspondence from the Office of the Vice President and involved his Rosemont Seneca team…keep reading.
/17 The Rosemont Seneca team, at Hunter’s direction, reached out to the OVP correspondence director to obtain a letter for an associate. During this exchange, Hunter’s assistant at Rosemont Seneca welcomes the new White House staffer “to the team.”
/18 These records further confirm that there was never a wall between the Office of the Vice President and Hunter Biden; in fact, there was extensive commingling between them.
/19 America First Legal will continue to share findings with the public through documents obtained from litigation against the National Archives. aflegal.org/new-hunter-bid…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🔎THREAD: Today, we sued the FBI and DOJ for illegally concealing federal records related to Biden government-sponsored censorship of the American people in advance of the 2022 midterm elections.
Follow along ⤵️
/2 On December 16, 2022, @mtaibbi revealed in The Twitter Files, Part Six that two days before the November 2022 election, the FBI National Election Command Post (NECP) sent an email to Elvis Chan in the FBI San Francisco Field Office, flagging twenty-five accounts as election “misinformation,” including @RSBNetwork, the official Twitter account for Right Side Broadcasting Network.
/3 The NECP requested the FBI San Francisco Field Office to coordinate with Twitter to take “action” on the accounts, preserve subscriber information, and gather location information.
/1🚨We just filed a class-action lawsuit against insurance giant @progressive — the 3rd largest insurer in the United States — for allegedly engaging in illegal racial discrimination.
Read about Progressive’s racism:
/2 Progressive is offering $25,000 grants to ten “black-owned small businesses to use toward the purchase of a commercial vehicle.”
/3 Progressive does not allow businesses owned by members of other races to even apply for these grants, and AFL’s client was barred from applying for this grant simply because he is not black.
/1🚨BREAKING — we sued the governor of Washington @GovInslee to block enforcement of a new “state-sanctioned kidnapping” bill that allows the state to hide kids from their parents to perform “gender transitions” - including disfiguring drugs and mutilating surgeries.
Read more:
/2 With our co-counsel Schaerr Jaffe LLP, and Joel Ard, we sued the:
✔️Governor of Washington, Jay Inslee
✔️Attorney General of Washington, Robert Furguson
✔️Secretary of the Washington Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Ross Hunter
/3 The recently signed legislation creates a dangerous incentive for minors who disagree with their parents on “gender-affirming care” to run away to a shelter or host home. The new law takes away a requirement of notice to parents.
/1🎮Activision, the company behind Call of Duty, has betrayed its duty to our country. We caught the company engaging in a pattern of race and sex discrimination, including professional networking groups for employees that exclude white, male, and straight workers.
Read on:
/2 Our Center for Legal Equality filed a formal civil rights complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against @Activision for using gender and racial preferences in hiring.
/3 We also sent a ease and desist letter to Activision demanding that they stop using these illegal preferences in hiring and to again focus on video games that create shareholder value, not promote fringe political ideology.
/1🥣Next time you fill up your morning cereal bowl with Frosted Flakes, you should be aware that @KelloggsUS appears to be using company resources to engage in illegal racial discrimination.
We opened the box & looked inside…and what we found is corporate malfeasance. THREAD:
/2 Our Center For Legal Equality filed a federal civil rights complaint with the EEOC against the Kellogg’s Company for engaging in illegal, race-based discrimination concerning employment and job training opportunities.
/3 We also sent a letter to Kellogg’s CEO and Board of Directors, warning them of their obligation to stop wasting the Company’s assets and breaching their fiduciary duty to its shareholders.
/1🚨BREAKING — we filed a shareholder lawsuit against @Target in federal court over its misleading statements to shareholders about monitoring political/social risks, resulting in a $12B loss due to its recent promotion of queer/transgender propaganda to children.
Keep reading:
/2 In its 2022 and 2023 Proxy Statements, Target assured shareholders and investors that the Board was monitoring for social and political issues and risks arising from the company’s ESG mandates.
/3 However, management only cared whether its leftist “stakeholders” were satisfied, disregarding the possibility that its customers and shareholders might feel differently.