The only solution to homelessness is to round them all up and physically remove them from the streets. Every single one must be coerced into decontamination and remain in custody while psychiatric issues/drug addictions/employment problems are triaged.
Some will never leave.
Doing this will be expensive - there's something over 30,000 homeless/drug addicted vagrants in San Francisco, in a city of only 815,000, almost 4% of the population.
But overnight, property values would explode, commercial interests would be reinvigorated, life would return.
The cleanliness and safety benefits to a city being cleared of its vagrant population—and effectively its dangerous drug buying population—would be enormous and near-immediate. Huge swathes of existing housing formerly considered undesirable would open up. Businesses everywhere.
Give me 5,000 men and 1,000 vans, Mother Columbia, and I will make any city of yours a new paradise in one Hour of American Exception.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This particular lawsuit is interesting.
I hope @Hooters wins it.
Why?
Let's go on a fun journey to explore American Civil Rights law and intersectionality, with some helpful visual aids.
Hooters is a Florida based™ chain of American restaurants which was incorporated on April 1st of 1983, as an April Fools' Day joke, with no expectations of success.
Here is its first Hooters Girl, Lynn Austin, starring in their first commercial:
Today there are over 400 locations.
Despite all attempts of modernity to kill it, from raging feminists, to the MeToo movement, to pretending ugly/crazy men can be women, Hooters endures as a "delightfully tacky yet unrefined" fixture for chicken wings, burgers, fries and beer.
A bit before his current cancellation ordeal and his apology, long after he wrote for Richard Spencer, back in May, Richard Hanania wrote “Ron Unz confronts the far right”. The object of the note, in retrospect, was likely for Richard to establish and solidify some amount of… https://t.co/qfY74sNTaAtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
What Richard posits is immigration’s critics—for reasons of lack of confidence in the moral posture of their arguments—are all attempting a rhetorical legerdemain, where what they don’t like is BLACK CRIME but what they feel is more respectful and prudent to talk about is MASS… https://t.co/bSbiZjZC2Mtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Have you ever been in a hotel room, or maybe seen one one in media. Have you taken your time to ponder upon the layout of the furniture, their functions, historical reasoning and positioning? The bed is of course the essential part, but what else is there? Bedside tables... and..
...Cuck chairs. Now, before you dismiss this as a simple joke of the present - a mere passing of the online zeitgeist, I invite you to ponder - what is the true meaning of these additional furniture pieces?
The pyramid on the left doesn't exist - only nursing homes and graveyards could be shaped that way, but plenty of nations approximate it under ~40.
The one on the right *does* exist, from schools and campuses to whole societies.
For example, here is the population pyramid of Japan in 2010...vs 1940:
You can see the impact of wars in the Japanese male population in the earlier part of the their 20th ca. but they were still growing...in the 21st century, they get the downward taper: i.e. now they're dying
The idea of cultural “resilience” or “adaptivity” despite changing demographics is isomorphic to raising another person’s children, when one could have had one’s own. It’s true that the Lingua Anglica is spoken all over the world, but cold is the cuckoo’s comfort.
Cosmopolitan elites who work with their minds (if at all), often traveling far from home either physically or mentally, discount ideas of nationalism or attachments to land, because their own personal tastes and advantageous modes are xenophilic, abstruse, and diffuse.
But they are a distinct, usually unnecessary minority, there’s no reason they should be tolerated in their instigating, neglecting, or indulging the wars & hostilities, the suffering & deprivations, the inequities & arbitrages which make up their interactions with everyone else.