Matt Beebe Profile picture
Sep 1, 2023 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
According to DA Fani Willis, you don't actually have to commit an overt act yourself to be a part of the RICO conspiracy, because others committing overt acts prove that you're a co-conspirator... or something.
It's literally Schrödinger's RICO. Image
"How does one become a member of the conspiracy?" he asked. "Ahh that's just it" Fani chortled, "you don't have to do anything to become a member, you already are!"
This is correct — a “meeting of the minds” is required for a conspiracy to exist. And the idea that Fani can prove that Trump-world had a “meeting of the minds” between the election and Jan 6th is laughable — they were all literally going in different directions the entire time!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Beebe

Matt Beebe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheMattBeebe

Sep 8, 2023
“That’s right, we took no evidence” 🤯

This is the clip that should be leading every newscast about the #PaxtonImpeachment

It’s just remarkable — watch at the end how three Senators in view (jurors — all three of which have telegraphed an anti-Paxton disposition) lean forward in unison as they realize how fatal it is to the core #txlege impeachment claims.

Watch a stoic Dean of the Senate John Witmire (D-Houston) drop his poker face for a second and give the side-eye to the #txlege House Managers that are prosecuting a case that is falling apart before their eyes.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 27, 2023
Pence errored on #Jan6 by not clearly following through on what he had telegraphed his plan was: present all purported certifications, ensure all evidence was fairly presented & weighed, and led the Joint Session through roll-call votes for all contested states.

I don’t believe there was extant evidence at the time or sufficient consensus to send anything back to state legislatures/reject any slate — so Biden would still be President — but the process would have played out in a credible and transparent way.

That’s where Pence failed: he failed to lead. He played footsie with Trump’s more audacious plan and then tried to “split the baby” in secret in the final hours. Had he actually taken the reigns and led, he could have ushered in a National healing moment. He failed to do that.

Vivek’s idea of proposing a bunch of legislation that wouldn’t pass is fanciful and naive.
Recall Pence had spent the weeks leading up to #Jan6 validating the #StopTheSteal sentiment, and then cowardly released his letter at the last minute instead of messaging it & defending it. That all happened BEFORE the session convened and any protestors had been let into the Capitol. The crowd’s chants were unforgivable, but the feeling of betrayal was predictable — which is precisely why he released it the way he did instead of standing up and defending it.

The way he rolled that decision out incited the riot more than anything Trump said…
On the surface this appears to be a legitimate criticism; but it doesn’t hold up.
Elections for President (and VP) are constitutionally mandated to be (1)“republican”* in form, and (2) conducted in a manner “prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof”

Objecting to failures of these mandates & adjudicating them isn’t “federalizing” the issue.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 19, 2023
For more than two years, the “Trump was trying to get Raffensperger to lie for him” canard has been widely accepted as true, ended up in the second Articles of Impeachment, and will likely be the focus of yet another Trump indictment in Georgia.

Yesterday Barr slides this one… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
And let me be clear, the point isn’t that Barr should have “helped” Trump.

Barr, who wraps himself in the flag and distances himself from Trump’s brash style tries to transcend the moment and portray himself as a statesman.

As such, he has an obligation to be a truth teller.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
It would be easy to dismiss Barr’s unwillingness to speak truth about the election as cowardice, especially as the narrative around the January 6th riots was being set and being on “the wrong side of history” would surely be concerning for a guy like Barr.

But when you see him… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 12, 2023
This DOJ has often abused 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) The Espionage Act. Let me tell you a quick story about one of the more egregious examples from recent history.
The case of Thomas Drake:
1/ twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
Drake was an NSA executive who became concerned about illegal activities, waste, and mismanagement within the Agency. He attempted to raise concerns through standard channels, and even elevated his concerns to Congress as a whistle-blower.
2/
Eventually he started leaking certain controlled, but *unclassified* information to a press contact.
This embarrassed Michael Hayden's NSA.
Our govt rewarded his efforts with 5 counts of retaining information, 1 charge of obstruction of justice & 4 counts of false statements.
3/
Read 7 tweets
Dec 29, 2022
In most jurisdictions the act of trafficking a child so they can be abused would be a crime. Here in Texas, a “Family” Court judge is deliberately facilitating it. Outrageous doesn’t even begin to describe it.
After multiple years of legal battles & a shameful failure to act by a Republican dominated legislature, a complex legal case is going to @SupremeCourt_TX — but the underlying facts are simple: a deranged mother wants to chop the penis off her young son.
And the Judge has granted the mother a highly atypical order allowing her the ability to unilaterally spirit the boy away to California, and has allowed her legal team to continue abusing the Family Court system to run out the clock on the father’s right to appeal.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 13, 2022
Yesterday’s 🧵 on Twitter’s abysmal information security ended with the following question “who had access to what? And maybe even more essential: why?”
Let’s let Mudge expound: “Because key parts of leadership lacked the competency to understand the scope of the problem” 🔥🤯 1/
Let’s hear that again: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it” — Upton Sinclair

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
2/
What does Twitter *really* know about you?

This is a shocking admission: 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(