Third thread of interesting but less known nuances of Panipat 3 with book screen shots of Vishwas Patil’s novel. Some bloodcurdling details will shock you. Don’t miss.
In Panipat 3 Bhau made a MAJOR mistake of carrying too much dead weight unarmed civilians so far from home in a territory without confirmed allies. Hard to understand why he would do such a thing! Maybe he was 30 & immature? But why didn’t seniors veto him? Mystery.
This paragraph that describes the distances involved In medieval battles.
Maratha army was spread 4 miles (1.5 hour walk)
Abdali was sitting 3 miles behind his army (1 hour walk)
Hundreds of scouts have him news updates
Barely a month before Panipat defeat, Peshwa Nanasaheb was busy marrying a 9 year old & doing wild festivities. Why couldn’t anyone smell a rat when no news came from Bhau. Why couldn’t Bhau send incognito messenger without a formal letter that Abdali wouldn’t catch? Beats me!
1 lakh Marathas had been slaughtered to defend the rights of Shah Alam to sit on Delhi throne & that a foreigner Abdali should be sent back. But within no time the Mughal mother forgot Marathas - their faith always comes first. It’s just Hindus that keep doing “India-India”
A lot to made of the letter that Abdali sent to Nanasaheb Peshwa praising Maratha courage & asking forgiveness for the slaughter. The only reason to write it was to keep Muslims safe in India from Maratha wrath to expand in future. Very opportunistic & cunning like always.
Malharrao Holkar, the father in law of Ahilya Bai Holkar was in Panipat with around 20k of his troops. In the middle of the battle when he saw sure loss he turned around & fled. Read his logical explanation - says better to live & fight another day than die for no reason
This one is debatable. Bhau had a choice of doing open battle with cannons vs guerilla style as recommended by senior generals. He choose to go with cannons backed by his trusted Ibrahim Gardi. Historians argue both ways.
Nanasaheb Peshwa wanted immediate retribution
but Malharrao suggested to wait for a more opportune time. Few know but 10 years post Panipat a huge Maratha army lead by Mahadji wrecked havoc on the Rohillas that fought for Abdalli & mass slaughtered them as revenge
This one is sad and a mistake Hindus repeat again & again. Marathas had given refuge to 2000 Afghan orphans. At an opportune moment they turned against Marathas in favor of Abdali. Why oh why are we like this ?
Two other interesting facts. Marathas had eaten nothing for 4 days before the battle & still almost won. Unimaginable grit of fighting so hard with no food in belly for 4 days
Nana Phadnis was there fighting with Bhau almost till the end but managed to escape alive
Other shocking facts
Abdali permitted his soldiers to slaughter any Maratha within 20 miles - 40k men/kids were murdered in cold blood. Women carried away for sec slavery
Jankoji Shinde was caught alive & a chieftain planned to extort money in exchange for releasing him. But fearing that Abdali has gotten to know this he had him murdered, chopped to pieces & buried with mutton & chicken remains
Samsher Bahadur the son of Bajirao & Mastani didn’t die in the battlefield. He survived, reached the palace of Raja Surajmal & died of his injuries in the palace
Ibrahim Gardi the gunner who almost won the battle for Marathas was also caught alive. Shuja had asked AaBdali to let him go. Abdali offered him a position in Kandahar which he refused. So he has him killed over 4-6 days by applying poison on his wounds.
If you find our threads informative and want to know more about the history/culture/geography of the world then do subscribe to our Twitter & YouTube. Grow your knowledge by helping us grow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dire civilizational warning - if you read one thread today let it be this one. Your future is on the line & honestly it doesn’t look too bullish for Hindus in India.
Using a real life anecdote from today I’ll show you how situation is no different from elections of British India in 1937 & 1946
Save this tweet for 2029
A childhood friend who’s now a successful businessman was in town & we met for a quick 20 mins
He’s very involved with BJP & close to one candidate who had been given an MP ticket as he had a good track record of winning MLA seats. This particular MP constituency had approx 5 MLA constituencies with one M majority area.
Because of his track record BJP candidate assumed easy victory.
And surprise - He lost.
Why? In 4 areas he did get higher % of votes but in the 1 M area the % against him was so overwhelming that his gain in other 4 areas was fully erased.
Every Hindu who thinks you'll automatically survive forever just because your dharma is "sanatan" (timeless) should read this unmissable thread
A brief history of Parsis (Zoroastrians) who once held sway over an area almost as big as India but near extinct today
Learning lesson
1700 BCE: Origins - Zathurashtra (founder and prophet of Parsis) imparts the principles of Zoroastrianism in Central Asia, believed to have occurred between 1700 and 1000 BCE.
550 BCE: Expansion - Cyrus the Great establishes the Achaemenian Empire, promoting Zoroastrianism as its predominant faith, leading to its unprecedented growth and territorial expansion.
1/14 What's the fundamental difference in organized Abrahamic faiths vs Hinduism?
Why did Hindus lose 50% land & mind share but didn't die out?
Don't miss this thread that combines history, human psychology and philosophy to answer basic civilizational questions
2/14 Most influencers, handles or narratives present a unidimensional view of history and human interactions i.e. the group they identify with is all good and adversarial groups are all bad.
But in reality history is multi-layered & humans are multidimensional
3/14 Humans if left without a domineering framework will pursue self interest first
For example a lot of Hindus allied with Mughals. Sikhs on occasion have allied with British & Mughals have fought Afghans, Christian armies have fought genocidal wars etc.