This shows the Earth's Energy Imbalance from a new perspective.
We have changed the rate at which heat accumulates on our planet beyond anything ever before.
We are finding out what this means together.
And we better pay attention.
Rapid changes come with great risks!
2/2
The paper has a very insightful "agnostic" approach to Earth's Energy Imbalance of the past, by looking at differences in oxygen isotopes from a sea level (water turning to ice and vice versa) and global ocean temperature perspective.
It doesn't seem to matter very much what the heat was directed towards, if you mainly care about the absolute Earth Energy Imbalance numbers.
More in this infographic and description:
Agnostic reconstruction of Earth’s energy imbalance (EEI) from δ18Obenth. Here we outline the steps taken to calculate EEI from δ18Obenth (left to right), which are described in detail in the methods. Briefly, δ18Obenth21 (left) is converted into sea level (second panel, top in yellow) and ocean temperature (second panel, bottom in green) using the assumption that the δ18Obenth signal is entirely attributed to one or the other. We then calculate the energy change associated with ice sheet buildup/melting from the sea level reconstruction (third panel, yellow) and with ocean warming/cooling from the ocean temperature reconstruction (third panel, green). EEI is then calculated by taking the time derivative of the energy changes and averaging over Earth’s surface area (panel 4). The gray lines in panels 3 and 4 show the calculated the global energy change (ΔEglobal) and EEI if we assume a constant 60/40 split of δ18Obenth between ice volume and ocean temperature changes.
The 150,000 year Earth's Energy Imbalance figure (c) from the paper:
"the probability of an AMOC collapse before the year 2050 is estimated to be 59%"
Looking and Atlantic heat transport reanalysis, relative sea ice anomalies, and model studies (including the effects of aerosols), I'm afraid the collapse of the AMOC might already be ongoing..
"The sudden collapse of carbon sinks was not factored into climate models – and could rapidly accelerate global heating"
“We shouldn’t rely on natural forests to do the job. We really, really have to tackle the big issue: fossil fuel emissions across all sectors,” says Prof @PFriedling