Rachel Glennerster Profile picture
Sep 3, 2023 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I spent some time today putting together thoughts for someone interested in the evidence on how to help low income countries (LICs) grow and I thought there might be wider interest so here goes a thread.

Achieving a higher growth rate is the holy grail of econ but...1/many
most economics models assume interventions can only improve a country's level of income not permanently increase growth. That is because they assume diminishing returns to capital. The first spade makes a farmer much more productive (vs hands), the second not so much...2/N
Even better policies (eg open trade) can get you higher steady state income but not permanently higher growth.
Despite this, a lot of policy discussion is about how to "kick start" or accelerate growth.
I think the mismatch comes b/c even temp growth spurts are very good. 3/n
A policy or investment that helps a LIC to catch up to rich countries more quickly is a massive even if does not shift steady state.
But most investments are not going to do even that, even if they have multiplier effects because multipliers die out. 4/n
So what can growth theory tell us about what investments might help LICs catch up? Innovation drives growth so investments that increase innovation or take up of innovation are key.
Appropriate prices (ie that reflect social value), trade, education help take up of innov. 5/n
Note that in standard models there is only one global frontier on innovation, but we need different technologies in some sectors in LICs. Eg, LICs have different crops, different diseases, different capital labor/land ratios. So returns to innovation for LICs are high. 6/n
Investment where there are increasing returns to scale can also boost growth temporarily. Belboni's paper with @orianabandiera @ImranRasul3 et al shows increasing returns for individuals over some levels of wealth b/c you cant buy 1/2 a cow. 7/n nber.org/system/files/w…
But its hard to imagine this working at level of a country. If there were increasing returns to scale generally then we would expect that when countries see a positive shock, eg from a commodity boom or cancelled debt this would lead to higher growth for a long time. We dont 8/n
So that leaves us with things that help with take up of innovation: education, getting prices right (which means good policy and thus good politics), and as most people work in agriculture in LICs, take up of innovation in ag. Lets take them one by one. 9/n
Correlational and some RCT evidence people who are more educated take up innovations faster from health (get their kid vaccinated) to ag (use hybrid seed). This is why education is so important. And we know a lot about how to improve education. 10/n
thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/231d982…
There is some promising evidence on how to improve policy and politics at the margin in LICs.
Giving rigorous evidence to politicians helps

11/naeaweb.org/articles?id=10…
Giving info to voters changes how they vote & can put pressure on politicians to be more accountable to voters.
(There are lots of +ve results here & some null, my take--influenced by @lwantchekon is it can work & making voters feel engaged is key) 11/n
journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.108…
Ag is sometimes dismissed by those seeking growth in LICs: who ever grew thro agr? Lots actually. Classic model is productivity in ag creates surplus that funds growth elsewhere. True causality prob goes both ways. Nice paper on role of approp tech in ag
scholar.harvard.edu/files/moscona/…
We know why ag productivity in LICs is low: little irrigation, new seed or fertilizer. But why is takeup of these innovations low? Lit suggests risk & behavioral biases play a part. Info & credit are minor. Many farmers dont want/arent good entrepreneurs
povertyactionlab.org/policy-insight…
Finally, there is intriguing new evidence on role of aspirations and how higher aspirations can drive higher investment and income. The impact of a small video designed to increase aspirations is just amazing. And the authors have tested it in 2 countries
mbrg.bsg.ox.ac.uk/mind-and-behav…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Glennerster

Rachel Glennerster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rglenner

Jun 12, 2022
I agree that political economy and the willingness of elites to allow reform is important for growth (who could disagree), but I find it less useful to compare political economy as a driver of growth to aid as the media loves to do. Thread 1/n
theguardian.com/global-develop…
Aid is, after all, very small compared to investment flows, remittances, and importantly spending by LIC governments and residents. The exceptions (such as Afghanistan) are exceptions for a reason. We keep putting money in b/c they failed. We stop when countries succeed. 2/n
But more importantly, most of aid is designed to make peoples' lives better until a country has higher living standards that can support and fund strong education, health, gender and poverty reduction policies. And there is evidence to suggest it can & does make a difference 3/n
Read 12 tweets
Feb 13, 2022
I just finished preparing my undergraduate lecture on the economics of women's empowerment and it reminded me just how radical economics is.

Thread 1/n
Objective is maximizing utility, not income, or education or anything others want you to want. Imp therefore that everyone has the opportunity, information, and capabilities to pursue what they think is important. Ie, economics and empowerment closely aligned. 2/n
Concept of diminishing marginal utility (of income, leisure etc) means its *efficient* to focus attention and resources on those who have less money or power or opportunity because any gains for them will have larger impact on utility. 3/n
Read 5 tweets
Jan 3, 2022
While at DFID I would provide new Sec of State an "Introduction to Development". By touching on evolution of diff approaches to development I sought to explain the need for diff parts of DFID & inoculate against claims of simple fixes. Thread 1/n
Yesterday I turned that slide deck into a lecture for undergrads at @UChicago. By showing how development has fallen foul of 1 dimensional fads my aim is to explain why we will cover both macro & micro, understanding what works in improving how teachers teach & how IMF works 2/n
So with some trepidation (I am simplifying massively & miss important development approaches in my overview and nuances in those I do describe), here is the basic thrust of the argument. I am sure #econtwitter can help me improve this. Aim is to show how diff approaches link 3/n
Read 16 tweets
Dec 29, 2021
This fall I taught a course for grad students @UChicago on the practicalities of running randomized evaluations, based in part on my book with Kudzai Takavarasha but with updates (eg machine learning in RCTs) press.princeton.edu/books/paperbac…
Some thoughts on what I learned.. 1/n
We need more courses in universities that teach how to take the ideas we are teaching and apply them to practical issues. Many students could ace the problem sets but the final project where they had to design an RCT showed who could work through practical issues involved 2/n
Most challenging part for many was that there was no right answer to many design choices. "Its a tradeoff" I said repeatedly (eg between more representative sample vs a sample with more take up and thus power). "I want you to explain why you chose the trade off you chose." 3/n
Read 11 tweets
Jul 5, 2020
In March we forecast indirect impacts of C-19 on developing countries through 3 channels:
1. global economic (eg commodity prices, capital flows);
2. containment's impact on livelihoods;
3. other secondary impacts (eg school closures).
What does the data say now? Thread.
Global demand and trade have fallen substantially. The IMF forecasts a contraction of 4.9% in GDP while WTO projects a fall in world trade of between 13 and 32% in 2020. Commodity producing emerging markets are forecast to do particularly badly.
This decline in GDP would translate into an increase in extreme poverty of 70 million if the previous relationship of GDP to poverty applied. The below estimates are from @DFID_UK internal model but are very similar to those from the @wb_research.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 19, 2020
Developing countries face extremely difficult but critically important choices about how best to respond to COVID-19 in a way that is adapted to their environment. These decisions are made harder by lack of good data. Proud that @DFID_UK is helping fill the data gap. Thread (1/8)
. @PEDL_CEPR & @CDCgroup have a call to fund data collection/studies on:
-Disruption to supply chains, especially in critical sectors (e.g. food, export sectors with continued demand)
-Income transfers to labour and firms
-Disruption to markets (2/8)
bit.ly/C19Call
. @UNUWIDER is part of an international consortium running a large international survey on the economic & social consequences of COVID-19. The citizens science project will examine issues such as mental health and the changing nature of the state (3/8)
bit.ly/LIfewithCorona
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(