Larry Schweikart Profile picture
Sep 3 7 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1) A couple of weeks ago, the Ford CEO admitted he was shocked at the "challenges" associated with driving a long distance in an electric Ford 150 truck.

2) Most notably, it took him "fowah howah" (to use comedian Jon Pinnette's best Chinese voice) to just recharge 40%!!
3) Here's the thing: even at that, the little "test" was staged and completely biased toward the truck.

4) A real test would look something like this:
*You must BE someplace in 15-24 hours. It will take you off well-known freeways, and include city driving.
4) Contd . . .
*You do not have the option of calling for gas backup. You must make it in your EV.

5) Now those challenges become Everest-sized mountains. Add to that your GPS can't find the next charging station---you have to just drive to find "gas" er, electricity.
6) And one more: maybe your GOPS says "charging station" but you get there and it's a TESLA station, which is incompatible with Fords.

7) You see my point. This CEO didn't come close to dealing with a real-life driving situation where he could not afford to take more . . .
7) contd . . . than 15 minutes to "refuel" even including going into the QuikMart for some Doritos and a Pepsi.

8) Let's add one more. You manage to find a charging station compatible with a Ford . . . only there are 10 other vehicles in line, each at a max 1/2 hour charge.
9) Rutabaga wants to create 30,000 charging stations nationwide . . . but right now there are 145,000 GAS stations and most of those have between four and twelve pumps. Each of those dispenses a full tank in less than 5 minutes.
10) Put another way, there area over 250,000 "gas charging stations" in America, which operate between 200% and 400% faster than electric chargers. But if you have a truck, it's closer to several thousand percent faster.

11) And Rutabaga thinks he's gonna have electric trucks.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Larry Schweikart

Larry Schweikart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LarrySchweikart

Sep 1
1) Some people are really abusing the history of the 2020 Presidential election in GA. Trump "lost" by 11,800 votes.
2) That election was the perfect storm for DemoKKKrats: they had six months to cheat & mail in phone ballots ("2000 Mules"), they still had to break . . .
2) contd . . . a water line in the Fulton Co. counting house, and they had questionable machines. And Trump STILL nearly took the state.
3) People point to two other reasons Trump "can't win" GA: First, Kemp won reelection easily and second, Walker lost.
4) Kemp's reelection had nothing to do with MAGA, Trump, RINOs or any other "normal" influencing factor. It was about one thing: Kemp lifted the lockdowns sooner than most (still locked down, unlike Noem).
Read 11 tweets
Aug 31
1) An old military saying is "improvise, adapt, and overcome."

2) In 2015-16, deprived of traditional media coverage for campaign, President Trump did just that: by holding rallies that were covered by LOCAL media---not only less biased but with less time to express bias . . .
2) contd . . . Trump made an end run around the Hoax News media. It was similar to the way Ronald Reagan did an end run around the Hoax News media of the 1980s by holding numerous Oval Office addresses straight to the people. Those were effective then because the Hoax News . . .
2) contd . . . had to cover his speeches back then.

3) When they no longer would cover Trump's speeches, he improvised, adapted, and overcame.

4) Joel Pollak and I addressed that here. Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 21
1) Let's review the DeSoros "influencers" anti-Trump arguments.

2) First, about four months ago, they began with the "Trump can't win" nonsense.

3) Quickly, polling began to contradict that in shocking ways. Obviously Trump was destroying DeSoros, then as now.
4) Today most polls have Trump up between 30 and 45 points over DeSoros.

5) Worse for him, he has plunged faster than White Lizzo into a Chinese buffet since March, when he was at 30%. Now, multiple polls have him under 10%.
6) I've watched politics for 40 years. This is one of the fastest, if not THE fastest, collapse I've ever seen rivaling Howard "Yeaaaaggghh" Dean, Steve (Cardboard) Forbes, and Phil (All-money-no-voters) Gramm.
Read 18 tweets
Aug 16
1) In the post-Civil War era, the GOP grew as corrupt as the DemoKKKrats (think Tweed Ring in NYC, i.e., Mayor Eric The Red Adams).

2) Beginning in the late 1870s the rebel faction in the GOP said "Enough." They put forth a reform candidate who would clean house, James Garfield.
3) The Swamp, then called "Stalwarts," of course did everything they could to stop Garfield.

4) Conveniently a killer showed up and shot Garfield, shouting "I am a Stalwart now [Chester A.] Arthur is president!"
5) Do not think today's Deep State will not resort to such measures as they get more desperate. But back to our story.

6) Arthur indeed had a reputation as a "swamp creature" in his customs commissioner gig in New York.
Read 12 tweets
Aug 10
1) Lessons from 2015-16 for the GOP primary.

2) In 2015-16, Trump jumped out to an EARLY (April/May) lead, which continued to grow.

3) Only one time, a week in Oct. 2015, did ANY candidate come close (Carson).

4) His better funded rivals, Yeb & Cruz, were crushed.
5) Cruz actually won IA and a few delegates, but anyone with the calculating skills of an orangutan could calculate that Trump would win enough delegates but also roughly WHEN.

6) In How Trump Won I recount how I figured out in early Feb. which primary would give Trump the Image
7) The key is a leader who never vacillates in the polls vs. someone who has wild swings (Carson in 16). In the latter case, yeah, it's possible someone could jump ahead. But the pol who is rock solid in support like Trump is NOT going to lose supporters, esp not now.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 5
1) Peter Zeihan @PeterZeihan has a new book "The End of the world is Just the Beginning." As with most of his works, he has excellent review & analysis of geographical realities & countries' strengths and weaknesses.

Where he gets in trouble is when he goes too far with prophecy
@PeterZeihan 2) He begins with the obvious: the old international structure under the Bretton Woods system is unraveling. There will be winners and losers.

3) Other obvious points: regardless of who is in the Oval Office, including the Usurper, the pudding-brained fartcomet, Rutabaga. . .
@PeterZeihan 2) contd . . . America has some massive, almost insurmountable inherent strengths.

3) We have more navigable waterways than the next three countries combined. If you include our island dotted coasts as "internal water ways, we probably have more than the next five countries.
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(