1) A couple of weeks ago, the Ford CEO admitted he was shocked at the "challenges" associated with driving a long distance in an electric Ford 150 truck.
2) Most notably, it took him "fowah howah" (to use comedian Jon Pinnette's best Chinese voice) to just recharge 40%!!
3) Here's the thing: even at that, the little "test" was staged and completely biased toward the truck.
4) A real test would look something like this:
*You must BE someplace in 15-24 hours. It will take you off well-known freeways, and include city driving.
4) Contd . . .
*You do not have the option of calling for gas backup. You must make it in your EV.
5) Now those challenges become Everest-sized mountains. Add to that your GPS can't find the next charging station---you have to just drive to find "gas" er, electricity.
6) And one more: maybe your GOPS says "charging station" but you get there and it's a TESLA station, which is incompatible with Fords.
7) You see my point. This CEO didn't come close to dealing with a real-life driving situation where he could not afford to take more . . .
7) contd . . . than 15 minutes to "refuel" even including going into the QuikMart for some Doritos and a Pepsi.
8) Let's add one more. You manage to find a charging station compatible with a Ford . . . only there are 10 other vehicles in line, each at a max 1/2 hour charge.
9) Rutabaga wants to create 30,000 charging stations nationwide . . . but right now there are 145,000 GAS stations and most of those have between four and twelve pumps. Each of those dispenses a full tank in less than 5 minutes.
10) Put another way, there area over 250,000 "gas charging stations" in America, which operate between 200% and 400% faster than electric chargers. But if you have a truck, it's closer to several thousand percent faster.
11) And Rutabaga thinks he's gonna have electric trucks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Some people are really abusing the history of the 2020 Presidential election in GA. Trump "lost" by 11,800 votes.
2) That election was the perfect storm for DemoKKKrats: they had six months to cheat & mail in phone ballots ("2000 Mules"), they still had to break . . .
2) contd . . . a water line in the Fulton Co. counting house, and they had questionable machines. And Trump STILL nearly took the state. 3) People point to two other reasons Trump "can't win" GA: First, Kemp won reelection easily and second, Walker lost.
4) Kemp's reelection had nothing to do with MAGA, Trump, RINOs or any other "normal" influencing factor. It was about one thing: Kemp lifted the lockdowns sooner than most (still locked down, unlike Noem).
1) An old military saying is "improvise, adapt, and overcome."
2) In 2015-16, deprived of traditional media coverage for campaign, President Trump did just that: by holding rallies that were covered by LOCAL media---not only less biased but with less time to express bias . . .
2) contd . . . Trump made an end run around the Hoax News media. It was similar to the way Ronald Reagan did an end run around the Hoax News media of the 1980s by holding numerous Oval Office addresses straight to the people. Those were effective then because the Hoax News . . .
2) contd . . . had to cover his speeches back then.
3) When they no longer would cover Trump's speeches, he improvised, adapted, and overcame.
4) Today most polls have Trump up between 30 and 45 points over DeSoros.
5) Worse for him, he has plunged faster than White Lizzo into a Chinese buffet since March, when he was at 30%. Now, multiple polls have him under 10%.
6) I've watched politics for 40 years. This is one of the fastest, if not THE fastest, collapse I've ever seen rivaling Howard "Yeaaaaggghh" Dean, Steve (Cardboard) Forbes, and Phil (All-money-no-voters) Gramm.
2) In 2015-16, Trump jumped out to an EARLY (April/May) lead, which continued to grow.
3) Only one time, a week in Oct. 2015, did ANY candidate come close (Carson).
4) His better funded rivals, Yeb & Cruz, were crushed.
5) Cruz actually won IA and a few delegates, but anyone with the calculating skills of an orangutan could calculate that Trump would win enough delegates but also roughly WHEN.
6) In How Trump Won I recount how I figured out in early Feb. which primary would give Trump the
7) The key is a leader who never vacillates in the polls vs. someone who has wild swings (Carson in 16). In the latter case, yeah, it's possible someone could jump ahead. But the pol who is rock solid in support like Trump is NOT going to lose supporters, esp not now.
1) Peter Zeihan @PeterZeihan has a new book "The End of the world is Just the Beginning." As with most of his works, he has excellent review & analysis of geographical realities & countries' strengths and weaknesses.
Where he gets in trouble is when he goes too far with prophecy
@PeterZeihan 2) He begins with the obvious: the old international structure under the Bretton Woods system is unraveling. There will be winners and losers.
3) Other obvious points: regardless of who is in the Oval Office, including the Usurper, the pudding-brained fartcomet, Rutabaga. . .
@PeterZeihan 2) contd . . . America has some massive, almost insurmountable inherent strengths.
3) We have more navigable waterways than the next three countries combined. If you include our island dotted coasts as "internal water ways, we probably have more than the next five countries.