Read on Twitter
Let's continue examining @MidwestAnglican investigation FAQ. This is Part II to my previous thread.
https://twitter.com/LuhmannAudrey/status/1697491757045366907?s=20
Q#6 explains trial composition/process.
Omitted: Bp. Stewart Ruch & @MidwestAnglican Chancellor Charlie Philbrick attempted to bring @The_ACNA Tribunal into the disciplinary process FAR in advance of where the canons place their authority.
For reference: anglicanchurch.net/update-on-the-…
Omitted: Bp. Stewart Ruch & @MidwestAnglican Chancellor Charlie Philbrick attempted to bring @The_ACNA Tribunal into the disciplinary process FAR in advance of where the canons place their authority.
For reference: anglicanchurch.net/update-on-the-…
Pertinent portion in bold.
Q#7 does not appear to be problematic to me. It quotes directly from Canon IV.5.7.
However, I am curious why answers to preceding questions involving the canons were erroneous, but this one was so tightly cited. Just an observation.
However, I am curious why answers to preceding questions involving the canons were erroneous, but this one was so tightly cited. Just an observation.
Q#8: CATEGORICALLY FALSE!
Bp. Stewart Ruch and other @MidwestAnglican leaders KNOW that one individual sent the presentment document to UMD clergy; another sent to members of @ChurchRez. A third individual sent to members in other parts of the diocese.
This is important. Why?
Bp. Stewart Ruch and other @MidwestAnglican leaders KNOW that one individual sent the presentment document to UMD clergy; another sent to members of @ChurchRez. A third individual sent to members in other parts of the diocese.
This is important. Why?
Saying "an attendee" drafted the presentment gives the reader the impression that the charges were the machinations of a lone wolf in poor Bp. Ruch's @MidwestAnglican diocese. (What a convenient narrative.)
It ALSO puts a target on that supposed individual. Calculatingly cruel.
It ALSO puts a target on that supposed individual. Calculatingly cruel.
Back soon for Part III...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
