one of the worst trends in men's tailoring in the last twenty years is how the buttoning point—the center button on a three button coat or the top button on a two button coat—has gotten pushed up over the years. you see this on desantis vs biden. 🧵
when a bespoke tailor makes a coat, they place the buttoning point near the waist (the slimmest portion of your torso). this does a two things.
1. it allows them to create more waist supression, giving you that flattering V-shaped silhouette.
2. it creates a nice balance between the upper and lower halves of the coat. the buttoning point serves as the visual fulcrum for the jacket. it's the point from which the lapels bloom and the quarters sweep out.
in the last 20 years, buttoning points have crept up. this is because the jackets themselves are shorter. when the jacket is short, the buttoning point has to be high, so there's proper distance from buttoning point to hem. but this looks unflattering
raising the buttoning point shortens the lapel line and makes the lapels look stumpy. it reduces the amount of waist suppression possible. in many cases, it can also make the wearer look like they have a beer gut.
in some rare instances, tailors have lowered the buttoning point. this elongates the lape line and gives the jacket a more louche, slouchy effect. however, to do this, you often need a longer jacket to preserve distance from buttoning point to hem.
in modern day tailoring, Kotaro Miyahira, founder and cutter behind Sartoria Corcos in Florence, Italy, does this sort of style. you can see here how the buttoning point is about a centimenter lower than the waist, elongating the lapel line and giving a slouchier look
the combination of a short jacket, high buttoning point, and low rise trousers does something else: they reveal the shirt fabric and waistband below the coat's buttoning point, ruining the harmony between coat and pants.
in tailoring, measurements as small as 1 cm are everything
if you already own suits like this, better to wear the jacket open. however, if you're shopping for something new, try to get
1) a jacket that ends about halfway from your collar to the floor when you're wearing heeled shoes.
2) trouser rise that's high enough to hide shirt fabric below your coat's buttoning point when it's fastened
3) and a coat that has a buttoning point at your natural waist, so you can get that longer lapel line and waist suppression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.