Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Jo Maugham Profile picture
@JolyonMaugham
Sep 7, 2023 • 12 tweets • 4 min read • Read on X
Hi @GregHands. A few questions, if I may... 🧵
Did Mark Higton, former Chair of Hammersmith Conservatives refer an offer to supply PPE to you, writing to you at your private email address?
Did civil servants record you *personally* in internal DHSC spreadsheets as being joint winner of a £25m PPE contract? And did they show Mark Higton as being the main contact for that contract? Image
Did Govt release your name as being the winner of a no bid PPE contract before scrabbling to delete that record? (). web.archive.org/web/2021111718…
Image
What is the connection between Mark Higton, former Chair of Hammersmith Conservatives, and Luxe Lifestyle? And why has Luxe still not filed its accounts?
Do you agree that, if a contract gets the VIP treatment, you having referred it on to civil servants and being closely associated in official documents with that contract, it's reasonable to describe it as a VIP contract?
Do you agree that the PPE described by civil servants as supplied by "Minister Hands/Luxe Lifestyle" was marked by the NHS as "Do not supply"? And that this indicated it was unfit for use?
Do you agree it is deeply peculiar that a company with negative net assets and no employees was awarded a £25m PPE contract after being referred by you and Mark Higton? Image
Do you agree that, contrary to what you say, Government's own Internal Audit Agency described the Luxe Lifestyle contract as having been processed through the VIP lane? And appears concerned no conflict of interest was declared by you? Image
Do you agree that, a draft Government Internal Audit Agency having described it as a "VIP Channel" contract and an MP, presumably you, as the referrer, it is very odd it was then removed from the published list of VIP contracts?

Image
Image
Image
As you say, @GregHands, "the truth does matter".

Given £25m of public money has been spent on a deeply concerning PPE contract in deeply concerning circumstances in which you appear to have played a central role, do you not think the public deserves answers? Image
If you are enjoying this takedown of Greg 'Clean' Hands, there's a whole Chapter of my Sunday Times Bestseller about the PPE scandal.

Get your copy here. waterstones.com/book/bringing-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture
Apr 19
The Minister who introduced the Gender Recognition Bill in the House of Lords in 2003 made it clear that "a transsexual person would have protection under the Sex Discrimination Act [the predecessor to the Equality Act] as a person of the acquired sex or gender." Image
This was reflected in the Explanatory Notes to the Gender Recognition Act when it was published. Image
The Supreme Court dismissed the explanatory notes as not indicating Parliament's intention.

But it seems entirely unaware of the speech of the Minister introducing the Bill, who made it perfectly clear that it was intended to extend the protections beyond biological sex. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jo Maugham Profile picture
Apr 17
I've been reflecting some more overnight on the For Some Women Scotland case. 🧵
In this piece, which I am proud of and I stand by every word, I make two serious criticisms of the procedure that the Supreme Court adopted. goodlawproject.org/the-supreme-co…
The first is that in a case which is fundamentally about the rights of trans people with gender recognition certificates the Supreme Court excluded all trans voices and added in the voices of those opposed to the right and dignities of trans people.
Read 19 tweets
Jo Maugham Profile picture
Apr 10
Good Law Project holds a copy of new NHS Guidance published yesterday and it is clear that Wes Streeting is continuing his war on trans people.

Remarkably the national health service is now directing GPs to cause harm to the community. 🧵
Background: the UK is a serious international outlier in how it approaches healthcare for young trans people. All over the world Governments are declining to follow the policy based evidence making of the Cass report. I believe we now have the most hostile regime anywhere.
Families in the UK who want to follow best medical practice - rather than pleasing Wes Streeting's true electorate (right wing media barons) - obtain puberty blockers (criminalised in the UK) from regulated prescribers in eg France or Netherlands or Switzerland. Image
Read 17 tweets
Jo Maugham Profile picture
Feb 20
Since putting up this crowdfunding page, the Daily Mail has sent us, through their lawyers (RPC), two defamation threats.

A few points about them. 🧵goodlawproject.org/crowdfunder/da…
One or both were marked “private and confidential - not for publication”.

We have long (👇) deplored the practice of making threats which you say are confidential to try and stop your critics from telling the world you are trying to silence them. goodlawproject.org/they-want-to-s…
Neither letter pretends to be a formal letter under the pre-action protocol for defamation claims - a necessary precondition to suing. Yet each is pregnant with threat.

To intimate you have a legal claim which you don’t actually have also feels to us like a misuse of the law.
Read 6 tweets
Jo Maugham Profile picture
Jan 20
Cass Review.

New article in the New England Journal of Medicine, founded in 1812 and amongst the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals. Its 2023 impact factor was 96.2, ranking it 2nd out of 168 journals in the category "Medicine, General & Internal". Image
I will share some extracts from it but tl;dr it is highly critical. It "transgresses medical law, policy and practice... deviates from pharmaceutical regulatory standards in the UK. And if it had been published in the United States... it would have violated federal law." Image
It calls for "evidentiary standards... that are not applied elsewhere in pediatric medicine... [and] are not applied to cisgender young people receiving gender-affirming care." Image
Read 9 tweets
Jo Maugham Profile picture
Nov 14, 2024
Labour caving to some of the richest people in the country - whilst raising the tax burden on employing the low paid - has been described as the "lobbying coup of the decade."

But how bad is it? 🧵 Image
Well, we know that Labour promised to raise £565m per annum from taxing private equity properly. But, after lobbying, agreed only to raise 14% of that or £80m. Image
Image
But in fact, it's worse that that (or better, if you are amongst that mega rich class).

For a particular type of carried interest Labour actually proposes to *cut* tax rates...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(