Thread by @Prolotario1

Read this carefully. Every non-US parent of a baby born in the U.S. has natural citizenship rights for himself and his child based upon the citizenship laws of his home country. Those rights cannot be usurped just because a citizen is a student in America.

In Donald Jasper Harris’ case, that is Jamaica. Jamaican law is very clear about Kamala’s citizenship at birth.

Do you understand? This is Kamala Harris parents we are talking about. So she doesn't even qualify as an anchor baby in this case.

So, unambiguously, by the laws of citizenship in Donald’s Jamaica, Kamala was born with Jamaican citizenship. Does this mean she has dual citizenship? Let's check out 14th Amendment/Supreme Court’s clarification of “jurisdiction” in US v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

The Wong Kim Ark decision created a simple test for jurisdiction for which all the elements must be true before it applies:

1. Child was born in the U.S.

2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country.

3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States.

4. Birth parents “are carrying on business.

5. Birth parents “ are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity” by the country of their citizenship”.

This is Kamala’s test to qualify as an “anchor baby:”

1. Child was born in the U.S.? Yes. Kamala’s birth certificate says she was born at Kaiser Foundation Hospital at 9:28pm on Oct. 20, 1964.

2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country.

YES, Kamala’s birth certificate shows that her father Donald is a citizen of Jamaica and her mother Gopalan is from India.

3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States.

No. student residence is not considered a permanent domicile/residence. Rather, for a college student. Example: A home residence is considered his legal domicile while his student abode is temporary.

Another example. A student cannot list her student housing residence in another state in order to qualify for in-state tuition. Likewise, a student cannot claim a student address as permanent domicile to meet the Wong rule and enable his or her newborn to become a U.S. citizen.

When Kamala was 12, her mother moved Kamala and her sister to Canada for graduate work at McGill University. Kamala attended high school in Westmount, Quebec, graduating in 1981. Which is something people have not brought up at all.

Did she claim Canadian citizenship during that period?

That would put her under the jurisdication of the British Crown with regard to the Wong test.

Occasionally, a student residence can be used as legal domicile, if the person has the provable intent to make it permanent.

The evidence is clear that Donald had no intention of making his Berkeley address at the time of Kamala’s birth his legal domicile. He moved 3 different times. With no intention for permanent residence. Plus, he was a full time student. Who was not here on business.