Outrageous the Home Secretary defends Douglas Murray as "mainstream"
She is *actively* promoting a man who said objectively racist & extreme things such as “Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board" & who has defended Tommy Robinson
Douglas Murray says London has become "foreign" because "in 23 of London's 33 boroughs "white Britons" are now in a minority" i.e. being non-white, means you are foreign and can't be British
Is the government view *really* that this is a mainstream view? @Tories4Equality
@Tories4Equality Murray said "less Islam" is a solution to terrorism (whilst talking about Muslims).
Is it *really* a government position that this is a "mainstream" view and not extreme?
@Tories4Equality Murray said he doesn't "think Tommy Robinson is a racist", and believes that Tommy Robinson has "never said a racist thing"
Watch the video if you don't believe me
This is not extreme?
@Tories4Equality He said “Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board”, called Islam an "opportunist infection", Muslims a "demographic time bomb" & that mosques should be “pulled down”
Murray praised the far-right in Italy (Salvini said Europe needs rescuing now or it will become an Islamic caliphate), and stood with supporters of Hungary's far-right anti-Muslim & anti-immigrant party Fidesz
Are these also mainstream views?
Caolan Robertson - who interviewed Murray - went further than the video above - and said: "Douglas Murray told me of his admiration for, and friendship with, Tommy Robinson"
Murray's former colleague described him as "unhinged & truly vile white supremacist, racist anti-Muslim bigot", "thoroughly nasty piece of work full of venom & hatred for Muslims", "perverse & deranged obsession with all things Islam related"?
What this thread shows - and there's of course so much more - is that the UK government wants views such as these and those on the far-right, to *not* be treated as extreme.
They want to remove any semblance of consistency in Prevent.
At least it is out in the open.
Of course this comes because Shawcross cited Douglas Murray as being unfairly disparaged in his Prevent review.
Note Shawcross was chosen to review Prevent despite (or perhaps because of) his awful views on Muslims - see here:
On a side note, it is unclear to me if Shawcross disclosed how Murray was known to him & had helped him on his book, before he published his support for Murray in the Prevent review.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nearly half of all articles referencing Muslims or Islam in 2025 contained some degree of bias
This is acc. to a huge new study on the state of British media in 2025 by @cfmmuk based on analysing 40,913 articles published across 30 UK news outlets
But it is fair to say Jake Wallis Simons has a particularly awful history during his editorship of the paper.
His attitude towards Muslims is vile.
But his defence of Douglas Murray, his attacks on ordinary protestors, his attacks on journalists, his attacks on even calling for a ceasefire, are just a small snippet of his awful views.
This protest was almost entirely peaceful with minimal arrests.
With a protest of this size, there are always a handful of idiots, but from the reporting it seems there were far less than for example at this pro-Israel rally a couple of years ago.
The idea that those exercising their democratic right to protest it show solidarity to Palestinians, are somehow an "intimidating mob" is just not okay.
After her racist smear was forcibly corrected (ht @cfmmuk), a source close to Braverman admits:
When referring to the 'grooming gangs phenomenon', she only meant high profile cases where Pakistani men were involved & not all group-based child sexual abuse bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Whilst this source calls the ruling "perverse", they are clearly wrong:
Only calling high-profile group-based child sexual abuse done by Pakistani men as "grooming gangs" is an astonishing admission, unjustifiable and incorrect
The IPSO ruling makes it clear how it is inaccurate. It is not a "political attack" - merely the correction of a false racist smear.
Shawcross, Gove & The Times appear to want to publish names of who they consider to be "extreme" Muslims/Muslim groups as part of their attempt to refocus Prevent on Muslims & not the far right
This is after a far-right terror attack against a migrant centre
Thread
ICYMI Shawcross said "..Islam is one of the greatest, most terrifying problems of our future"
He targeted Muslim charities. He defended torture. He seems to even have wanted Foreign Office officials to mock Islam
Whilst @KeithPrinceAM has now apologised and a few thousand have seen the apology, the GB News tweet with the conspiracy theory remains up with no clarifying tweet from @GBNEWS.
It'd almost as if they want the conspiracy theory to be shared.
Does anyone know if they apologised on-air and just didn't clip it up?