Nate Hochman Profile picture
Sep 7, 2023 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
For over a decade, the ADL used undercover spies to conduct a vast, coordinated, and potentially illegal campaign of espionage against the John Birch Society.

Until this year, that campaign was a secret.

It was uncovered by a historian digging through historical archives. 🧵 Image
In March, GWU historian Matthew Dallek published a book about the John Birch Society (JBS), a hard-right anticommunist org that was prominent in the 60s and 70s.

During the research process, Dallek was given access to a trove of internal ADL documents from that time period. Image
What Dallek uncovered was “a lengthy, multidimensional, and previously undisclosed counterintelligence operation waged by the ADL to infiltrate and dig up damaging information about” JBS, spanning from 1959 to the 1970s—and involving current and former US intelligence officials.
The ADL's spies — which included police officers, accountants, religious leaders, journalists, and members of civil society — used code names to pose as Birchers, feeding intel back to the ADL.

The tactics they used to collect that intel were highly secretive—and often extreme: Image
"Some of the ADL’s financial investigations, from using third parties for credit checks to fishing for data about individuals’ trusts, may even have been illegal," Dallek wrote.

But for the ADL, the ends "justified the morally questionable means, which included outright spying."
According to Dallek, the ADL utilized a kind of proto-doxxing: Spies "searched for connections between the society and respectable individuals and institutions, to embarrass them into renouncing" JBS.

As a result, "Birchers...sometimes found their careers in jeopardy."
This was carried out through the ADL's close relationship with members of the media, which it leveraged to threaten Birchers, derail JBS events, and coordinate public pressure campaigns—an early version of the advertiser boycotts the ADL uses against figures like @elonmusk today.

Image
Image
Image
One of the key figures in this operation was Isadore Zack, a former counterespionage expert for the US Army.

During WWII, Zack worked in "domestic intelligence" — i.e., spying on other Americans — as detailed in this 2001 piece from a local paper:
patriotledger.com/story/special/…
Image
After the war, Zack became director of "fact-finding and public relations" for the ADL’s New England region, overseeing "a cadre of ADL spies."

Unsurprisingly, Dallek writes, those spies "employed techniques that were on par with government-backed clandestine operations." Image
Under Zack's leadership, the ADL worked directly with US intelligence agencies. Zack was in regular contact with the FBI, feeding intel to J. Edgar Hoover's Subversive Trends of Current Interest Program, which "recorded thousands of pages of material" about JBS. Image
It wouldn't be the first—nor the last—time the the ADL worked with government intelligence agencies to take down political dissidents.

As @shellenberger documents here, the group has a long history of illegal espionage, extending well into the modern era.
The point here isn't that you should agree with the politics of the JBS — a group that was known for kooky, fringe conspiracy theories — or any of the other groups that the ADL has spied on.

The point is that in a free society, ideas should be hashed out in the public square.
Since its inception, the ADL has sought to undermine that principle, and has opted instead for the use of subterfuge tactics against its ideological opponents.

It's not a "noble" organization that has simply lost its way; it's been like this from the start. #BanTheADL

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nate Hochman

Nate Hochman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @njhochman

Jan 30
Whenever Robert E. Lee comes up, liberals suddenly become foaming-at-the-mouth nationalists—raging about “traitors,” “treason,” etc.

The only other time they ever use this language is when they’re talking about Trump. That should tell you a lot about what this is really about.
tapping the @Antweegonus sign: Image
@Antweegonus I wrote about this on the anniversary of the Appomattox last April:

spectator.org/undoing-the-ap…Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
The refugee NGOs are a perfect example of a self-licking ice cream cone:

1) The government gives NGOs money to resettle refugees.

2) The NGOs lobby for more money—and more refugees.

3) Rinse, repeat Image
It's not even particularly clandestine or secretive—a lot of these groups are openly boasting about it.

The USCCB, for example, regularly touts their efforts on their website: Image
Image
Same thing with HIAS—one of the groups whose funding skyrocketed under Biden. (And is actively involved in transporting migrants up from South America into the U.S.)

These guys are in DC, actively advocating for expanding asylum, more refugees, etc:
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 28
This is arguably the single most important aspect of Trump's funding freeze.

The immigration crisis isn't an accident. It's a well-oiled system, facilitated by powerful NGOs—and funded by your tax dollars.

By defunding the NGOs, Trump is crippling the entire system. 🧵 Image
Here's what just happened: Last week, President Trump signed an executive order suspending refugee admissions into the U.S.

Then, the State Department went a step further—they issued a "stop-work" order to their NGO "partners," suspending all funding for refugee resettlement. Image
Image
The NGOs were beside themselves. And for good reason—very few of these groups are self-sufficient. Most of them are sustained by the federal tax-dollar gravy train. The immigration crisis is being financed by your government—with your money.

Hence, their outraged statements: Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Jan 27
For years, we were told that "the internet isn't real life." But in this election, it was. Online influencers, issues and ideas played a major role in the 2024 election—especially on the right.

Today's right is more "online" than the left—and that's part of why it's winning. 🧵 Image
Conservative politics used to take place on the airwaves of Fox and talk radio, in established journals and magazines, think tanks and direct-mail campaigns, etc. Now almost all of that is downstream of the internet. In 2024, the right-wing "lifeworld" is shaped online. Image
It's a trickle-down information economy: Not every Republican voter is active on here. But the people that *they* get their news from are. The talk-show pundits, Fox News scriptwriters, journalists, etc are almost all "very online." This is where the influencers are influenced. Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Jan 16
In his farewell speech, Joe Biden raged against the "tech-industrial complex."

That "complex" is real. But it's extremely left-wing.

There's a revolving door between Big Tech and the Democratic Party.

They're not just allies—they're often literally run by the same people. 🧵 Image
There are a number of high-profile renegade tech titans (i.e., Elon Musk) who are "on the right." Obviously, that's who Biden was talking about in his speech.

But they're exceptions to the rule. Writ large, the tech industry is an extension of the institutional Left. Image
In the 2020 campaign, for example, employees of Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple and Facebook were "the five largest sources of money for Mr. Biden’s campaign and joint fundraising committees among those identifying corporate employers," according to the Wall Street Journal: Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Jan 16
Mass deportations aren't the only way to send immigrants home.

With the right incentives, some will leave on their own.

"Voluntary remigration" has worked in Europe. It can work in America, too.

A quick thread. (1/9) Image
Obviously, it should go without saying that any successful large-scale repatriation effort will require mass deportations.

We've done that before, too—and we can (and must) do it again.

I wrote a thread about this yesterday. (2/9)
But deportations aren't the only tool in our arsenal. We can use carrots and sticks.

"Remigration" has become a popular term among anti-immigration activists in Europe. The head of Germany's AfD used it in a speech this weekend.

Trump himself used the term in September. (3/9) Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(