For over a decade, the ADL used undercover spies to conduct a vast, coordinated, and potentially illegal campaign of espionage against the John Birch Society.
Until this year, that campaign was a secret.
It was uncovered by a historian digging through historical archives. 🧵
In March, GWU historian Matthew Dallek published a book about the John Birch Society (JBS), a hard-right anticommunist org that was prominent in the 60s and 70s.
During the research process, Dallek was given access to a trove of internal ADL documents from that time period.
What Dallek uncovered was “a lengthy, multidimensional, and previously undisclosed counterintelligence operation waged by the ADL to infiltrate and dig up damaging information about” JBS, spanning from 1959 to the 1970s—and involving current and former US intelligence officials.
The ADL's spies — which included police officers, accountants, religious leaders, journalists, and members of civil society — used code names to pose as Birchers, feeding intel back to the ADL.
The tactics they used to collect that intel were highly secretive—and often extreme:
"Some of the ADL’s financial investigations, from using third parties for credit checks to fishing for data about individuals’ trusts, may even have been illegal," Dallek wrote.
But for the ADL, the ends "justified the morally questionable means, which included outright spying."
According to Dallek, the ADL utilized a kind of proto-doxxing: Spies "searched for connections between the society and respectable individuals and institutions, to embarrass them into renouncing" JBS.
As a result, "Birchers...sometimes found their careers in jeopardy."
This was carried out through the ADL's close relationship with members of the media, which it leveraged to threaten Birchers, derail JBS events, and coordinate public pressure campaigns—an early version of the advertiser boycotts the ADL uses against figures like @elonmusk today.
One of the key figures in this operation was Isadore Zack, a former counterespionage expert for the US Army.
During WWII, Zack worked in "domestic intelligence" — i.e., spying on other Americans — as detailed in this 2001 piece from a local paper: patriotledger.com/story/special/…
After the war, Zack became director of "fact-finding and public relations" for the ADL’s New England region, overseeing "a cadre of ADL spies."
Unsurprisingly, Dallek writes, those spies "employed techniques that were on par with government-backed clandestine operations."
Under Zack's leadership, the ADL worked directly with US intelligence agencies. Zack was in regular contact with the FBI, feeding intel to J. Edgar Hoover's Subversive Trends of Current Interest Program, which "recorded thousands of pages of material" about JBS.
It wouldn't be the first—nor the last—time the the ADL worked with government intelligence agencies to take down political dissidents.
As @shellenberger documents here, the group has a long history of illegal espionage, extending well into the modern era.
The point here isn't that you should agree with the politics of the JBS — a group that was known for kooky, fringe conspiracy theories — or any of the other groups that the ADL has spied on.
The point is that in a free society, ideas should be hashed out in the public square.
Since its inception, the ADL has sought to undermine that principle, and has opted instead for the use of subterfuge tactics against its ideological opponents.
It's not a "noble" organization that has simply lost its way; it's been like this from the start. #BanTheADL
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm surprised no one's written about the broader issue here: The Biden administration's embrace of "Indigenous ways of knowing" is one of its more radical concessions to campus ideology. It's a categorical rejection of the scientific method — and ultimately, of objective truth.
A good @JoshDehaas essay from back in 2018 detailed the rise of the "Indigenous ways of knowing" fad—it begins at the basic idea that Indigenous communities have different epistemologies (i.e., "ways of knowing") that are just as valid as Western science. quillette.com/2018/05/22/ind…
The "Indigenous ways of knowing" (IWK) doctrine is at once radically skeptical and pseudo-mystical — skeptical of traditional truth claims, as expressed by Western science, while simultaneously hewing to utterly irrational "knowledge" revealed, for example "through...intuitions."
The latest from Biden's "equity agenda": Scientists at certain government-funded facilities are now required to attach an Indigenous land acknowledgment statement to all of their published research. @NRO nationalreview.com/corner/science…
This comes on the heels of the new "White House Indigenous Knowledge guidance sheet," which argues that "Western science has been used as a tool to oppress" Native Americans — and also that the "marginalization" of "Indigenous Knowledge" has resulted in "racism and imperialism."
And, of course, last summer's conference series between White House agencies and Native American activists, aimed at ameliorating past "experiences where Indigenous Knowledge was avoided, undervalued, or ignored in Federal policy decisions." whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-upda…
The cool thing about American history — actual, authentic American history — is that it was a team effort. The effort to re-write its achievements as entirely credited to today's favored identity groups misses what's actually beautiful about the country we built together
Hence, weird revisionist efforts like "maybe Louisa May Alcott was a transgender man" (debunked by a couple discerning NYT readers in the letters section here): nytimes.com/2023/01/09/opi…
In today's America, conservatism is a counterrevolutionary project. If the Right hopes to take back the culture, it will have to become comfortable thinking of itself as an insurgent outsider — just as the Left once was.
If conservatives want to regain a foothold in American institutions, they can learn from one of the Left's preeminent strategists: Antonio Gramsci, the Marxist theorist who died a prisoner of Italian fascism in 1937—decades before the rise of the New Left that he helped inspire.
Gramsci's influence on leftist thinking is difficult to overstate: In contrast to the classical Marxist idea that society was shaped by economic relations, Gramsci argued that the ruling class wielded power via "cultural hegemony"—i.e, control of civic and cultural institutions:
Today, 200 New York Times contributors published an open letter condemning the Times for its "editorial bias" against transgender people. According to them, the paper's coverage of transgender issues has a right-wing bias.
This isn't a new allegation. Last month, a former Media Matters editor published a blog post titled: "The New York Times Declares War on LGBTQ People With Hire of Anti-Trans Columnist."
The NYT articles that these arguments cite as evidence of the paper's "bias" are a handful of relatively balanced pieces on the debate over the transgender movement, particularly as it pertains to children, that — quelle horreur! — attempt to give a fair hearing to both sides.