fooler initiative Profile picture
Sep 7 40 tweets 8 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
wait.
lol.
jim jordan sent a what?
LOL.
okay. i was pretty preoccupied the last couple weeks.
i did NOT know this happened.
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subs…
fam.

this woman told jim jordan that the only accurate thing in his letter was the part where he listed the defendant's charges. God Almighty.
in paragraph 2, she gives caselaw.
then she quotes the caselaw. so, *so* much.
and she LOADS it with "Id." just "Id" everywhere the human eye can see. and you KNOW she's typing hard and saying "like. i. fucking. said." with EACH keystroke.
THEN she uses TRUMP'S OWN 2020 CASE....
which ALSO cites the caselaw she cites. lol. just in case anyone had any questions about the applicability of the example that she chose.

My God.
and in the VERY NEXT BREATH........she quotes a 2022 letter from JIM JORDAN echoing the same sentiment she is.

NASTY work. lol.

FILTHY.
now she's quoting a book about house rules and protocols.

lol.

quoting a book about house rules and protocols to the CHAIRMAN of the house judiciary committee.

leaving a flaming bag of dogshit at his front door would have been less disrespectful than this letter. lololol.
she said the man's attempt at intrusion is unconstitutional, and that his demand for information is.....JESUS.... "*offensive* to *any* notion of separation of powers... ."

be anything in the world you want to be EXCEPT offensive to any notion of separation of powers.
now she's listing the standards that must be met before anything like jordan proposes can have a snowball's chance of moving forward. lol. then she tells him it's clear he can't satisfy any of them, "let alone all of them."

ooooh, girl. burrrrrrrrrrn.
now she's citing todd peterson's 2020 journal entry on the importance of the independence of federal prosecutors and telling jim jordan it would be bad enough if he were attempting to f with a *federal* case....(the implication here being, "but at least it's plausibly SOMEWHERE
in your bailiwick.....however tangentially......since it'd be *federal*"). then she's all, "but you're trying f with STATE shit? STATE SHIT? you're talking about messing with STATE shit?!" *GASP*
and yet ANOTHER trump case directly applied: Image
Listen.

Listen.

Don't you ever talk to me like this.
Lolol.

Not ever.

On Christ the solid rock, I stand....don't you ever talk to me like this. Lol. Image
she said, "here's something else, my good bitch. if you don't want to get charged in fulton, don't do your dirt shit in fulton."
now she's telling him the whole premise of his letter is wrong. and that "defendant trump" (burn) can't be immune from prosecution just b/c he's running for president. then she says, "that mf knew we were investigating him when he *announced* his candidacy."
How she didn't preface this "With all due disrespect," I'll never know- Image
okay. so....lol...."hav/plenty" is one of my favorite movies. one of my favorite PARTS of that movie is a scene where lee and hav are making out, and hav asks lee if he'd be upset if she didn't wan to have sex, and he tells her he wouldn't, and then she gets upset b/c he
said he wouldn't get upset. then hav says, "lee, i know you don't know this about me, but i'm a freak." then she expounds on how she wants to feel when she's in someone's arms. then she's all, "i'm sorry, that's just how i think. maybe you should go read up on
freaks and how we think."

that's what THIS *********ICONIC*********** shit makes me think of: Image
1. SHE TELLS HIM THAT IF HE WANTS TO GET LESS IGNORANT ON THE TOPIC THAT IS SO CLEARLY ABOVE HIS CURRENT UNDERSTANDING, HE CAN READ A GODDAMNED BOOK.
2. THEN SHE PROVIDES THE BOOK TITLE.
3. THEN SHE TELLS HIM..........
hold on a second.
lol.

i want to have my inhaler on my lap when i type this next part.
THEN SHE TELLS HIM..........
THAT AS A -
"NON
MEMBER
OF
THE
BAR"--

AS A
"NON
MEMBER
OF
THE
BAR"--
HE CAN BUY THE BOOK HE SO DESPERATELY NEEDS TO READ.............ALBEIT.......AT A DIFFERENT PRICE POINT THAN SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY AND FACTUALLY WENT TO SCHOOL FOR THIS SHIT......
FOR
*two* *hundred* *and* *forty* *nine* *dollars.*
i'm gonna call that ENTIRE paragraph:

The Old Yeller
she FOLLOWS with..."And I just KNOW you didn't fix your mouth to p-ache about how long this is gonna run. it would have moved a hell of a lot faster if your little friends weren't playing games in court instead of responding to my lawfully-issued subpoenas.
If you have a concern about my timetable, kindly consult Lindsey Goddamned Graham."
THEN she says that he has no basis to allege that her office has misappropriated federal funds. Then she ATTACHES A DOCUMENT outlining alllllllllllll the state programs those funds go to. THEN she says, if he wants to continue to threaten to deprive her county of those
funds, that's his business--
so long as he knows that he's effectively helping rapists, serial killers, and child predators run loose in the world. then she's all, "if you hate rape kit dna forensics, just say so, jimmy. just say so." and TO BE CLEAR..............
Willis SPECIFICALLY HIGHLIGHTING the harm those actions will cause to sexual assault survivors....Willis SPECIFICALLY quoting one.....*TO JIM JORDAN*--a man accused of standing IDLY BY........while a fellow wrestling coach at OSU SEXUALLY ASSAULTED STUDENTS.......is NO ACCIDENT.
lol.
fam. Image
ALL OF HER SUGGESTIONS FOR HOW THIS MAN CAN OCCUPY HIS DAMN TIME INVOLVE REQUESTS FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO SEND HER COUNTY MORE FUNDING.
then she CLOSES w/, "since you are so pressed about fulton & the shit that happens here, why don't you look into all the racist threats of violence me & my team have received since you started popping off wild at the mouth, lying on my name. i've attached 10 examples hereto. ho."
i sincerely hope that i sufficiently convey on a DAILY basis that THIS
is a prosecution-*hostile* account.

i'm in mixed company so i won't speak to how that goes *double* for a very specific kind of prosecutor.

but *this* is a prosecutor-hostile space.

make NO mistake.

every day.
any way.
it's fuck them forever and always.
THAT SAID...............

THAT SAID..............

THISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS...

documentcloud.org/documents/2394…
is a thing of *ethereal*, eternal, *transcendent* beauty.
jim jordan is too smug to care. and i'm POSITIVE he didn't read it in part, let alone FULL--

but any other sentient being walking this earth--
anyone else on the PLANET experiencing its charms in corporeal form---

would throw the fuck up if that letter were directed at them.
b/c when i tell you that i would VOMIT BLOOD.
My God, my God.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with fooler initiative

fooler initiative Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @metroadlib

Aug 15
don't even think about it. it's 11: 20 pm and i'm still working for the job that funds my profligate lifestyle.

don't even think about it. and i have memos and motions due all week. don't even think about it.
HOW MANY FUCKING LAWYERS ARE ON THIS INDICTMENT?!!?

CHRIST ON A HONEY GRAHAM CRACKER.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 1
lemme see what we got.
case in point---this next bit. piece by piece, okay? on 12/10 cc5 sends the memo to all of their points of contact in the target states.....but LEAVES OUT the parts about the fake votes and fake electors. he doesn't send anything to WI b/c they already had it.
on 12/11, cc5 tells cc1 to talk to that asshole AZ lawyer we just saw. cc1 tells the lawyer that he (AZ lawyer) needs to file a writ of cert with the supreme court (a writ of cert essentially tells the court that you have reason to believe something has run afoul
Read 100 tweets
Jul 27
A SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT?!!?!!
the timing is *horrific*.

i have had the longest 48 hours ever and i really, really, *really* need to draft this motion to dismiss AND a sentencing memo to be filed on monday.

*sigh*

sixty pages, huh?
all right. i have an intro. let me see what this thing says.

wonder if i have enough paper to print it out.

gotta "borrow" a few reams from the office tomorrow.
Read 48 tweets
Jul 12
So...

Let me see....

if I have this.

Let me see if I've got this right. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/j…
Clarence Thomas's aide, Rajan Vasisht, had..........a venmo account.

A venmo account that was--inexplicably--public.
and in November and December of 2019..........7 of Thomas's former clerks--the majority of whom are now conservative big wigs at their respective firms, some with integral roles in recent SCOTUS cases--

sent money to Vasisht.......on this *inexplicably* public venmo account.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 30
It's very early, and I have a very long morning ahead, and I am gearing up to abandon this app for a good 4-5 days...
But let me say this-
Periodically, I sit and think about getting older (a lot, actually, these days). And I find myself, more and more, examining how I view things now versus how I saw things when I was younger. All of us whose ideologies incline left tend to think that we have it right (ha!)-
I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that I've always had it "right"-- letting ppl love who they love, honoring everyone's bodily autonomy, proactively creating spaces for Black ppl and other persons marginalized on the basis of race or religion to not only live but thrive-
Read 17 tweets
Jun 30
last night, before bed, i finally got up to speed on the colleen ballinger mess. i've largely ignored it b/c i do NOT get that miranda sings character, and that part of YT wasn't fashioned for me? so i side-stepped the drama. i just knew ppl were making allegations.
b/c it was pretty late, i'd hit the pen in an effort to go to sleep (and be high).....so i kept scrolling and scrolling trying to find whatever apology video everyone was talking about.

on GOD, i scrolled past the actual video for 10 mins before i realized.
i'd ASSUMED the girl in the video still was a look-a-like doing a PARODY. b/c my understanding was that i was meant to be searching for an APOLOGY video...and the woman in the still was holding...........a guitar.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(