-Professor who said police are "systemically racist" is fired for faking data
-The Journal "Nature" is caught publishing articles which fit narratives editors liked
-Department of Education investigates @realchrisrufo for not using "correct" pronouns
2/ The corruption of America's education system begins in the Universities.
In the 1960's Leftist radicals got an idea from communist Antonio Gramsci which said taking over a society requires taking over the culture and establishing something Gramsci called "Cultural Hegemony"
3/ Cultural Hegemony says that to get and keep power you must be backed up by a culture that agrees with what you're doing. You need your ideology, value system to be baked into the songs, stories, art, of your society so your views are constantly reinforced by the culture.
4/ So, with idea in mind, the Radiacl leftists of the 1960's set their eyes on taking over and controlling all the institutions of culture in America, especially Universities.
Leftist Education Scholar Isaac Gottesman explicitly states that this is what happened👇
5/ So the Leftist radicals went into universities with the very specific goal of using the Universities as a vehicle for ideological warfare.
All our cultural institutions relating to justice, truth, art, beauty, and commerce are staffed with people trained at universities.
6/ Because Universities are supposed to use objective criteria to select the very best ideas to teach their students, and be the place where our most capable and talented thinker reside, Universities have tremendous amount of social prestige, influence, clout and credibility.
7/ As a result idea that comes out of a University, or is published in an academic Journal run by a University, automatically gets "the benefit of the doubt" and is treated as a smart, serious, excellent, well thought out idea.
However, we need to note something here...
8/ All the social capital Universities have in the form of clout, prestige, influence, importance, deference, and credibility, is capital that was gained by universities when they were making discoveries and judging ideas on the basis of standards that were applied neutrally...
9/ That is, when Universities were not putting a political "thumb on the scale" and instead applied standards of truth to everything using objective criteria, they make a great many scientific discoveries.
When they do this in art the produce tremendous painters and musicians...
10/ The problem is leftist radicals want to do away with the neutral standards, and instead make their own leftist political ideology one of the standards for getting a degree, becoming a professor, or having your work published.
And, unfortunately, the radicals are succeeding.
11/ The Universities produce exceptional work in everything, but only when there is a very high objective standard of quality that is applied equally to everything.
If someone puts a political thumb on the scale then good work gets ignored because it has the wrong politics...
12/ And bad work begins to get a pass because it has the correct politics.
This means that the very high standard which resulted in exceptional work, and the foundation on which the prestige, clout, influence, and reputation of the Universities rests is now compromised.
13/ And this is what has happened.
Henry Giroux, as he explains here, went and got over 100 radicals tenured as "a political intervention." This is nothing less then the corruption of the university system.
14/ The result of this is that now Universities are putting their seal of approval on ideas, not because of their objective quality, but because they agree with the ideological leanings of the leftists who have worked their way into positions of power within universities.
15/ This is an extraordinarily difficult problem to solve because universities only work when they are set up in very specific ways, and they are very very hard to set up, and very easy to mess up.
This is a problem that is very hard to solve and we need to work on it...now.
16/ We can't just let the leftist have the universities, they have to much social and financial capital for us to allow that.
We can't just bulldoze them because we need educational institutions to train our docters, engineers, scientsts, etc
So this is a REALLY hard problem.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Oliver Anthony (@AintGottaDollar) reads the bible on @joerogan's Podcast, and Andrew Huberman (@hubermanlab) discusses his practice of prayer on @lexfridman's podcast
The Logos as the transcendant fixed point of reference is returning to prominece in our culture
A thread 🧵
2/ As @jordanbpeterson explains here, the logos was the central idea around which western civilization was developedThe "LOGOS" : it is the divine thing around which the cosmos is ordered, which gives the cosmos objective meaning, and makes the cosmos intelligible.
@jordanbpeterson 3/
The issue our culture has been struggling with most is the issue of *MEANING.*
Both the sense of telos/purpose (aka the meaning of life, or why are we here?) and semantic and linguistic meaning.
The reason for this is that postmodernism ejected the logos from the culture.
Leftists insulted, diminished, smeared, and shit on every aspect of "white culture" in the name of identity politics.
They said everything from ballet to beethoven was racist, stolen or inferior.
They antagonized white people by saying "white people have no culture."
And...
They used the thin veneer of social theory to cover up the most vile and disgusting forms of racism against Asians, White people, and Jews.
The applauded racist taunts against conservstive blacks, openly calling Clarence Thomas and Thomas Sowell "Oreo" and "Uncle Tom"
And...
They said that any person from approved groups (black, brown, muslim, Natove American) could be proud of good things associated with their culture, but unapproved groups (white european, asian, certsin jews) are not allowed to be proud of anything associated with their culture...
1/ "No enemies to the right" is a trojan horse for terrible ideas
Because it's "no enemies **TO** the right" instead of "no enemies **ON** the right," NETTR allows the most extreme people on the right to avoid public criticism even when they're clearly wrong about something...
2/ Whereas the extremist right wing person can lob out criticism of any right wing person slightly less right then the extremist.
A 10 on the right wing scale can publicly attack a 9 on the right wing scale, but the 9 can't fire back publicly...even when the 9 is correct...
3/ This turn NETTR into what I always suspect it was: a sheild to protect certain people from any public criticism at all.
Another problem is that NETTR erodes the value of truth. NETTR prevents criticism of those "to the right" not those who "tell the truth."
1/ One way that woke activists were able to take over the education system and get away with it was to make the claim, phrased in various different ways, that education is and always has been utterly political.
Woke activists politicizing education,
A thread 🧵
2/ They claim education is always political. This is why you often see articles in academic journals dedicated to education that say thing like: “education is inherently political,” “education was always already political,” “teaching is a political act,” and so on and so fourth.
3/ As such. Critical Social Justice activists in education set about developing a theory of teaching in which the values, goal, agenda, perspective, worldview, and ideology of Critical Social Justice/wokeness are built into the fabric of how teaching is done.
It's because they've been hijacked by "Activist Scholars" who use them to spread woke ideology.
These political activists are using universities as vehicles to indoctrinate students into far left ideology
Here are the receipts:🧵
2/ Let's get something clear first.
The problem is NOT merely that some professors have blind-spots that can be corrected by other professors with different views. That's not what I am talking about here....
Activists Scholars are an entirely different problem.
3/
It used to be that University professors would try to teach about ideas as evenhandedly as is possible. Of course everyone has biases, but the idea was that professors would at least TRY to put their biases aside and teach the material in a balanced, fair, evenhanded way...
1/ The woke have taken over education, and it's worse then you think.
This teacher, who doesn't know when America was founded, says she teaches students about Protesting and Black Lives Matter, but won't teach the official curriculum
The woke education take over explained: A🧵
2/ Isaac Gottesman (an advocate of Critical Social Justice/wokeness) wrote the book "The Critical Turn in Education," and explains how the 1960's radical leftist brought Marxism into universities - in the 1970's, and took over the field of education in the 70's and 80's.
3/ Gottesman also explains that in the 70's and 80's the marxists actually pushed the original Marxist ideas past where Marx took them amking them even more radical. He also freely admits that the marxists "radicalized" the field of education.