As part of our study of the vulgar register of Late Old IA we found the Skt cognates & attempted identification based on that & a lexicographic search. We paste that below:
devAnAmpiye piyadasi lAja hevam ahA saDuvIsati-vasa-abhisitena me imAni jAtAni avadhiyAni kaTAni seyathA
suke sAlikA alune chakacAke haMse nandImukhe
The beloved of the gods, king priyadarshin spoke thus: [having been] annointed for 26 years the following beings were declared unkillable by me, namely (seyathA= tadyathA):
suke: shuka: parrot
sAlikA: shArikA: mynah
aluna: aruNa: spotted eagle
chakacAke: chakravAka: Brahmany goose
haMsa: haMsa: common goose
nandImukha: nandimukha: comb duck
gelATa: gairATa: hill mynah
jatUka: jatUkA: bat
amba-kapIlikA: ambA-pippIlikA: queen ant
daLI: dauleya/Duli: terrapin
simala: shrImara: Sambar deer
saMDaka: shANDaka: Mithun(?)
gelATe jatUkA ambA-kapIlikA daLI anaThika-maChe vedaveyake gaMgA-pupuTake saMkuja-maChe kaphaTa-sayake paMna-sase simale saMDake okapiMDe palasate
seta-kapote gAma-kapote save chatupade ye
paTibhogaM no eti na cha khAdiyatI <> eLakA chA sUkalI chA gabhinI va pAyamInA va avadhiya<>ke...
okapiMDa: okapiNDa: Stinkbug (?)
palasata: parasvat: ass
seta-kapota: shveta-kapota: White dove
gAma-kapotA: grAma-kapota: Village pigeon
save chatupade: sarve chatuShpadaH: all tetrapods
ye paTibhogaM no eti na cha khAdiyatI: which are neither used for entertainment nor eaten.
eLakA: ajakA: she-goat
sUkalI: sUkarI: sow
gabhinI va pAyamInA va avadhiya<>ke: those pregnant and nursing are unkillable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This seems to be the massive book form treatment of Zoller's hypothesis. While I have not read the book, I have read his paper on the same. Entirely independently, based on some obvious linguistic signals &multiple lines of philological evidence, I have always favored the idea of
the Aryan invasion in multiple waves along with the initial straddling of the steppe and the subcontinental zones. His provides a new version of the Inner-Outer IA hypothesis. Essentially he posits that only the inner lects are descendants of Vedic & subsequent Sanskrit while the
the outer lects are descendants of distinct para-Vedic lects that had some archaisms inherited from IE>I-Ir that did not come into Vedic& its daughters. Where we differ from his ideas is that the progenitors of outer lects had arrived in the subcontinent before Vedic -- they were
A bucket with the images of the ongod-s of the shamans of the Qorchin tribe of Mongols. They are the descendants of Chingiz Khan's brother Qasar & his followers. At the time of the rise of the Tungusic lord Nurhachi who founded the Manchu empire they broke away from their cousins
to join the resurgent Tungus & were major factor in their dominance & power down to the battles with the Europeans in China -- the last blaze of Mongol prowess. Their shamans curiously claim descent from Kököchü the shaman of the Khan who caused a major fight between him& Qasar
The Khan's wife later warned him of the rifts Kököchü was causing & he was eliminated by the 3 wrestlers when the shaman's brothers tried to fall on the Khan himself. The ongod-s, like those shown above, are the deities & ghosts that possess the shamans. They worship a subset of
Political orientation is something that rises from deep within; as we have noted before, it has a biological basis. There might be some truth to its relationship with polymorphism in odorant receptors. There is something like reaching your "preferred station" -- an equilibrium
Some people reach that point early in life (that was my case). However, due to environment, others might not immediately do so.The journey to the fixed point might be a gradual spiral or through chaotic fluctuations. Many go through chaos in the 20s/30s but in small number it may
take them till their 50s to get to their home. Yet they all converge. Because of chaos in the 20s/30s that several experience, their friends/fellow travelers might express regret or frustration over their "sudden change". In reality, they are simply finding their home. A careful
To put it politely early bauddha tantra-s incorporated material from H tantra-s which have been lost. For example, the ma~njushrIya mUlakalpa has the short mantra-s of the chaturbhaginI & mentions tumburu of the vAmasrotas. They are worshipped in a boat in the midst of the ocean
the chaturbhaginI & tumburu are also incorporated into the related bauddha text, the tArA mUlakalpa. The ma~njushrIya tradition has a kaumAra mantra keeping with the deity being called kumAra-bhUta or kArttikeya-ma~njushrI:
There are two separate issues: 1. mode of recitation; 2. divergence between shAkhA. Regarding the 1st, I know some people have special views & get hot like wood being drilled on hearing this; so don't @ me. However, posting my view here since more than one person asked in the
past few days. Yes, there are regional peculiarities of recitations & substratal effects (particularly strong in some kali~Nga traditions). However, I don't think these are serious differences. Looking at the totality of the surviving traditions it may be said, broadly there was
1 ancestral recitational mode that has 2 variants: 1. where every long svarita was duplicated (RV, SYV-K, AV); 2. where only those before consonants & sentence ends were (KYVs). This type (probably both modes) go back to when the Aryans 1st conquered India& probably stemmed
It is true that the kR^iShNayajurveda schools died out in their K-P heartland. There is not objective evidence that this happened due to the shu~Nga-s or kANva-s. We have insufficient inscriptions to give a precise answer. However, where we have more inscriptions we get an idea
of the dynamic. Once taittirIyaka-s were seen in va~Nga, kali~Nga & nepAla; however, now they are pratically extinct except for recent immigrants. They have greatly declined in lATAnarta & vidarbha. The charaka-s were likewise in va~Nga & kaTha-s possibly in prAgjyotiSha. But
those are completely extinct. Instead, only shAkhA that survives is madhyaMdina or kANva (kali~Nga). The model in those regions was an aggressive spread of vAjasaneya-s which might even go back to the early period when 1 of the early proponents (seen as founder) of that tradition