BREAKING MUST READ: The new PIfzer/Moderna shots coming out are under the PREP Act, which requires only voluntary participation. Moreover, "it appears" these shots will be the first licensed product vials to hit the shelves. The FDA told these companies in JUNE to make a shot, and they did in less than 60 days. However, despite 361,000,000 potential contraindications between the two drugs and 19,000 other licensed drugs, the FDA actually licensed them for commercial marketing, which is why they will not let them outside of the PREP Act's absolute immunity. NURSES, all seasonal influenza shots are also under the PREP Act for this year, which means you are not required to take the shot under a mandate.
However, the HHS Sec has brought ALL child vaccines under the PREP Act to provide absolute immunity for all damages, bringing into question the vaccine injury fund and how it might not be available to new victims. HHS ALSO is providing PREP Act immunity for ALL seasonal influenza "vaccines," which means that no one can be required to participate, and I am releasing a video explaining the legal reason why.
AMERICA - EVERY child vaccine administered this year is under absolute immunity, and every seasonal influenza vaccine is under absolute immunity. Additionally, many masks, testing articles, and protective equipment are still under EUA and the PERP Act.
Here is what is covered:
Any antiviral, any drug, any biologic, any diagnostic, any other device, any respiratory protective device, or any vaccine manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured:
To diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure COVID–19, or the transmission of SARS–CoV–2 or a virus mutating therefrom; or
to limit the harm that COVID–19, or the transmission of SARS–CoV–2 or a virus mutating therefrom, might otherwise cause; (b) a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in paragraph (a) above; (c) a product or technology intended to enhance the use or effect of a product described in paragraph (a) or (b) above; or (d) any device used in the administration of any such product, and all components and constituent materials of any such product.
WAIT, you're not ready for this: HHS Sec extended the disease categories under the PREP Act, which could be 100% of all diseases and medical treatments.
"The category of disease, health condition, or threat for which I recommend the administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures is not only COVID–19 caused by SARS–CoV– 2, or a virus mutating therefrom, but also other diseases, health conditions, or threats that may have been caused by COVID–19, SARS–CoV–2, or a virus mutating therefrom, including the threat of increased burden on the healthcare system due to seasonal influenza infections occurring at the same time as COVID–19 infections, which will lead to an increase in the rate of infectious diseases."
In other words, if you go to the hospital due to an auto accident and the hospital uses a respirator that is under the PREP Act in a manner causing you significant harm, the hospital can claim PREP Act immunity because they were under an "increased burden" to attend to all the other patients in the hospital for COVID-19 even though you did not go to the hospital for COVID-19 treatment.
The PREP Act is the most unconstitutional piece of legislation ever to come out of Congress. Don't believe me? Congress wrote into the PREP Act that the judicial branch of government can not issue a writ of mandamus nor review the legality of the HHS Sec's actions. In other words, the legislative branch provided one person with god like authority that they said that no person in America can touch including the President or the Supreme Court. An authority overriding the U.S. Constitution, state's sovereignty, and our Due Process rights.
No person can require any other person to participate in a "covered countermeasure" under PREP Act immunity and I intend to get that ruling from courts around the nation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Breaking & WOW...Firefighters in King Co WA suing Eastside Fire & Rescue for violating their 14th Amendment rights to refuse fed owned investigational drugs were SHOCKED when Eastside claimed in fed court that Comrinaty "was indisputably available to Plaintiffs." Thread/part 1
This claim is shocking because Eastside is implying that Pfizer, HHS Secretary, FDA, and President Biden engaged in felonious activities by issuing EUAs when a licensed drug existed in King Co which conduct is expressly prohibited by Congress. Thread/part 2
However, Plaintiffs are in possession of CDC documentation where Pfizer informed the agency that it did not, nor would it manufacture the licensed version during the time of the mandate. Thread/part 3
Legal Fact: Hospital CEOS purported to have authority to amend the label for the legally distinct unlicensed drug, “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” because another legally distinct drug, Comirnaty, sharing formulation on paper, was approved by the FDA, although such amendment to the label would violate 21 U.S.C. § 331(a) and 333(a)(2)), a fact well-established by federal courts.
21 U.S.C. § 331(a) and 333(a)(2)) are "misbranding" and "mislabeling" leading to the adulteration of the product. A doctor can be prosecuted for misbranding by injecting a shot without a prescription. Pfizer was fined $1B for misbranding by promoting Bextra outside its label.
A hospital issuing a mandatory vaccination requirement that persons must take a drug labeled as investigational but claiming it is the same as licensed could be prosecuted for misbranding.