Legal Nuke inbound to the Supreme Court, where it will learn for the first time that all states and hospitals had 2 federal contracts promising: 1) not to mandate unapproved COVID-19 drugs, 2) to protect your right to refuse, 3) not to pressure participation, 4) 🧵 4) not to condition public benefits on use of the drugs (e.g., unemployment, educational access, use of professional license), and that the 5) PREP Act expressly denies govt's the right to mandate EUA drugs, 6) 🧵

Breaking & WOW...Firefighters in King Co WA suing Eastside Fire & Rescue for violating their 14th Amendment rights to refuse fed owned investigational drugs were SHOCKED when Eastside claimed in fed court that Comrinaty "was indisputably available to Plaintiffs." Thread/part 1 This claim is shocking because Eastside is implying that Pfizer, HHS Secretary, FDA, and President Biden engaged in felonious activities by issuing EUAs when a licensed drug existed in King Co which conduct is expressly prohibited by Congress. Thread/part 2

Legal Fact: Hospital CEOS purported to have authority to amend the label for the legally distinct unlicensed drug, “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” because another legally distinct drug, Comirnaty, sharing formulation on paper, was approved by the FDA, although such amendment to the label would violate 21 U.S.C. § 331(a) and 333(a)(2)), a fact well-established by federal courts. 21 U.S.C. § 331(a) and 333(a)(2)) are "misbranding" and "mislabeling" leading to the adulteration of the product. A doctor can be prosecuted for misbranding by injecting a shot without a prescription. Pfizer was fined $1B for misbranding by promoting Bextra outside its label.