The impact assessment is interesting - worth a read - but missed a fundamental point: that if the scheme is watered down with significant exemptions then that mean less funding raised for public transport and more traffic - harming those it identifies as most impacted!
Facts:
200k+ #Edinburgh residents don’t have access to a car. Many who do still rely on public transport.
The richer you are, the more likely you are have multiple cars and drive more.
#Edinburgh women have shorter commutes, women are less likely to have a drivers license.
“why don’t you just use the powers you’ve got” is a sadly familiar refrain in Scottish politics - as maddeningly frustrating as talking only about needing carrots but not sticks… despite evidence saying sticks are effective and make the carrots easier to buy and more attractive!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The planned 2006 £2/day charge to pass one of the boundaries would have raised £50mn a year had it been introduced.
By now, the city might have raised an extra £850mn to spend on public transport.
Possibly above a billion if adjusted for inflation.
Almost two decades later, Edinburgh has ambitious car km reduction targets backed (in principle, although sadly not in practice) by 4/5 council parties.
But without measures like a congestion charge to both cut traffic AND raise funds for public transport, those will be missed.
🌳⬆️more trees
♟️⬆️more bollards
🌷⬆️more greenery
🚶⬆️walkable neighbourhoods
🚃⬆️prioritise public transport
🪑⬆️more places to sit
👂⬇️less noise
🚗⬇️fewer (but not no) cars
France is consistently adding green to grey spaces.
And it does so not as an exception, but at the point streets are resurfaced - often filtering them too.
Rather than planters, #Edinburgh needs to add proper rain gardens and greenery as well as…
…street trees.
Trees are either lacking or don’t feature enough in #Edinburgh plans for George Street, Teviot Place, Dalry, the recent tram routes, the West Edinburgh link etc.
#Edinburgh designs are grey, late-1990s designs and not welcoming or climate-friendly.