their website used to say that they created golden because "the world is lacking a decentralized graph of canonical knowledge that is open, free, permissionless and incentivizes agents to enter data into the graph."
i assume they awkwardly tacked on that bit about "incentivizing agents to enter data into the graph", because otherwise they're just describing @wikidata
now they appear to have taken away this incentive model, and have closed down the "community" they once cultivated
@wikidata the site used to invite you to verify facts, many of which were simply scraped from wikidata to begin with
because they had a less flexible data model, this introduced some errors (see example from when i was poking at it last march)
@wikidata now those contributions are gone, as is any record of them.
as far as i can tell, so are the "points" for contributing that they promised would be used to calculate token airdrops once the golden token launched
@wikidata they also described the points/token system as critical towards incentivizing accuracy, because people risked having their tokens slashed if they added incorrect information.
guess that's just gone now?
the web3 website now redirects to one advertising that golden uses "sophisticated natural language processing techniques to extract canonical information on topics and entities from a wide range of public and private sources."
that's a lot of words to say you built a webscraper
Most of the logged-in UI now invites you to make (limited) queries against their dataset, or sign up for a pro ($290–$350/person/yr) or enterprise ($?) subscription.
I erroneously wrote before that you can't edit — you still can, though that statement verification tool I mentioned upthread seems to be totally gone.
Despite their apparently powerful "NLP techniques" to scrape the web, none of these pages has any content almost a year later
this was the original plan. i guess that whole "we need to incentivize people with crypto" thing turned out to be optional?
they've scrubbed all mentions of blockchains/crypto/NFTs from their site (excepting mentions of crypto-focused datasets)
and it's all gary gensler's fault
the very first topic they suggest when you go to the "explore" page is COVID-19
it lists hydroxychloroquine in the "COVID-19 potential treatments and interventions" table, and although it mentions the EUA was revoked, states that it is "being investigated to treat COVID-19"
🙃
no mention, of course, of the potentially life-threatening side effects
the page was last edited on May 24 by "Golden AI"
the two edits before that (May 2) were by a person who works for Golden as a "QA editor"
they don't appear to have a publicly visible feed of all changes, but this sure feels like a ghost town
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Former FTX exec Ryan Salame has pled guilty to two charges in the ongoing FTX trial. Many had been wondering when an indictment would come out against him, particularly as his donations to Republican political causes had already been alleged to have been straw donations.
Salame (pronounced "Salem", not "salami") was mentioned in the prosecutors' motions in limine, which revealed that they had access to some of his personal communications.
He's been charged with one count of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business and one count of conspiracy to make unlawful political contributions and defraud the Federal Election Commission.
In 30 minutes: a hearing on whether Sam Bankman-Fried will be remanded to jail after leaking to the press private diary entries of a witness in his case.
See my past coverage of this:
•
• https://t.co/WCbaAWSkCT
• https://t.co/n3KPYDsefe
I wish the SEC had filed their exhibits in the binance lawsuit, which include internal chatlogs, before I published my article (newsletter.mollywhite.net/p/sec-v-binanc…) because these are great reading 🍿
Instead I will do a thread 🧵
Chats between Samuel Lim (former Binance Chief Compliance Officer) and Alvin Bro (another Binance employee):
Lim: "bnb suka suka anyday can go to zero"
Bro: "can easily go to cents"
Lim: "anyone who takes BNB now is fking brave"
Bro: "u not alone on this sinking ship now
if it sinks
we can find float [together]
LIKE TITANIC
hahahhahahaha"
A deep dive on Andreessen Horowitz's latest "State of Crypto" report. In short: they want people to keep buying crypto, and are not above publishing blatant falsehoods to convince them to do so.
The report itself is 60 pages long, so this is a long one.
If you found this critical analysis of their report valuable, consider signing up for a pay-what-you-want subscription. My writing is never paywalled, and your support goes long way to helping me continue doing this kind of work. newsletter.mollywhite.net/p/pay-what-you…
I start by noting that this "creativity" with the numbers is not new to this year's report. However, because the price downturn was still somewhat recent in last year's, they were able to get away with some subtle manipulations that would be a lot more obvious this year.
Sam Bankman-Fried has filed motions to dismiss all but three charges in the criminal case against him.
The charges he is not contesting atm are: 5. Conspiracy to commit commodities fraud 6. Conspiracy to commit securities fraud
and 11. Conspiracy to commit money laundering
At least part of it seems to come down to the fact that additional charges were added after SBF's extradition agreement was made.
CourtListener's not cooperating because the documents were just uploaded but here are the first four pages of one of the supporting declarations.
Ted Cruz says "I'm a Bitcoin investor personally. I have a standing buy order. Every morning I have a buy of Bitcoin that comes in... I own a little more than 2 BTC."
Per his STOCK Act disclosures he bought btwn 0.4 and 1.4 BTC in Jan 2022. Hasn't disclosed any purchases since.
Few possibilities here. 1) He's not been filing his disclosures. 2) He's lying to play to his Bitcoiner audience 3) He bought the remaining 0.6 – 1.6 BTC ($17,400 – $46,400) within the last thirty days, and set up the repeat buy order within that window.
4) He's buying <$1,000 in BTC each week. As I understand it the STOCK Act only requires a Periodic Transaction Report of purchases >$1,000 (regardless of how often they're made, which seems like a crazy loophole!) But I could be wrong on this, please correct if so