ChrisO_wiki Profile picture
Sep 14, 2023 16 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/ Here's a good trivia question: the apparent destruction by Ukraine of the Kilo-class submarine 'Rostov-on-Don' marks only the second time since World War II that a submarine has been confirmed lost due to enemy action in wartime. What was the first? Read on to find out. ⬇️ Image
2/ Many submarines have been lost through accidents since the end of World War II. The United States lost 4, the USSR and Russia lost 18, and other countries lost a handful of vessels as well. But only one other country definitely lost one due to enemy action: Argentina.
3/ The submarine in question was the ARA Santa Fe, originally the US Navy's Balao-class diesel-electric submarine USS Catfish. Launched in November 1944, she was sold to Argentina in 1971. She was to become the last WWII-era submarine to be used in combat.
Image
Image
4/ Santa Fe and her sister vessel, ARA Santiago del Estero (ex-USS Chivo), served alongside new Type 209 submarines from West Germany. Both vessels were active during the Falklands War, but only Santa Fe participated in combat.
5/ On 2 April 1982, Santa Fe landed commandos on East Falkland near the islands' capital, Stanley. After returning to Argentina, she embarked on a second mission to the remote British island of South Georgia on 16 April, 1,541 km southeast of the Falklands. Image
6/ Despite her age and poor armament – twenty WWII-era Mk14 torpedoes and three modern Mk37s – she was tasked with transporting marines to South Georgia and then attacking the slower ships at the 'tail' of the British fleet in the South Atlantic.
7/ The vessel reached Grytviken, the only settlement on South Georgia, which Argentinian forces had seized on 3 April. Santa Fe unloaded the marines to reinforce the small Argentinian garrison there and set off back out to sea to find British ships to attack. Image
8/ However, she was detected by the sonar of the British destroyer HMS Antrim. A Wessex helicopter took off from the Antrim to find the submarine, which was travelling on the surface. The Wessex dropped two Mk.XI Mod3 depth charges, straddling Santa Fe. Image
9/ The explosions severely damaged Santa Fe, forcing her captain to turn around and head back to South Georgia. She could no longer submerge. The British continued pursuing the submarine, launching a Lynx ASW helicopter from HMS Brilliant armed with a Mk46 sonar-guided torpedo.
10/ Unluckily for the British, the torpedo had been designed to target deep-diving Soviet submarines; it had never been meant to target surfaced vessels and was programmed with a minimum depth. It could not lock onto Santa Fe and passed harmlessly underneath the vessel.
11/ The Lynx began strafing the submarine with its door-mounted machine gun, while Santa Fe's crew fired back from the vessel with their own small arms. Meanwhile, Wasp helicopters armed with with AS.12 air-to-surface missiles took off from HMS Plymouth and HMS Endurance. Image
12/ This time the British scored hits, achieving at least four and possibly five hits against Santa Fe's sail. However, the missiles had been designed to attack steel targets; the sail was merely fibreglass and light alloy. One missile went straight through without detonating. Image
13/ The other missiles did detonate, injuring a number of Santa Fe's crew, one seriously. The crippled submarine made it back to Grytviken but was immediately overtaken by the British recapture of the island on 25 April 1982. With no hope of escape, her captain surrendered. Image
14/ The British attempted to move the stricken submarine away from the quay to guard against the danger of an accidental detonation of her 23 torpedoes. However, Santa Fe partially sank and an Argentinian sailor, PO Felix Artuso, was shot dead by a British soldier. Image
15/ The vessel was eventually dragged into deeper water but then sank fully while under tow. She was raised in a risky and difficult operation in February 1985 but sank again under tow, going down 9 km off South Georgia in 358 m of water on 20 February.
Image
Image
16/ (Note: one other submarine was lost in a post-WWII war – the PNS Ghazi in the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965. However, the cause of its loss has never been clearly established, with India claiming to have sunk it and Pakistan claiming it to have been lost through accident.) /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChrisO_wiki

ChrisO_wiki Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisO_wiki

Feb 15
1/ Telegram will not be restored in Russia, and tighter restrictions will be imposed on mobile phone ownership, says Sergey Boyarsky, head of the State Duma IT Committee. He cites scammers, pro-Ukrainian sabotage, and drone attacks as the reasons behind these moves. ⬇️ Image
2/ In a wide-ranging interview with the St Petersburg online newspaper Fontanka, Boyarsky has explained the thinking behind the government's new restrictions on Telegram. He says that "Telegram doesn't comply with Russian Federation law, and hasn't done so for many years."
3/ "The requirements are simple, basic: localise user data within the Russian Federation, remove prohibited information (extremism, terrorism), and cooperate with law enforcement agencies to solve serious crimes (for example, the Crocus [terroist attack] case)."
Read 17 tweets
Feb 15
1/ While Telegram is only part of a wider complex of communications systems used in the Russian army, it comprises a keystone without which the wider system falls apart. A commentary by a Russian warblogger explains the Russian army's communications ecosystem in detail. ⬇️ Image
2/ Responding to comments earlier this week by presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov, 'Vault No. 8' provides a "briefing note" on the role of Telegram in the Russian military communications ecosystem.
3/ "A typical motorised rifle regiment (today, the basic tactical unit—the military unit that holds the front line) utilises several tools to manage its troops:
Read 41 tweets
Feb 15
1/ While the Russia army struggles with the impact of Telegram and Discord being throttled or blocked by the government, Ukraine has long used a highly sophisticated indigenously developed digital command and control system. Russian warbloggers have highlighted the contrast. ⬇️ Image
2/ Detailed accounts such as the one in the thread below illustrate how Telegram – a commercial app run from Dubai – has been a central tool in the Russian kill chain, allowing for rapid responses to Ukrainian actions. Discord was also heavily used.
3/ Although this approach has been effective, it has now deliberately been rendered unusable by the Russian government. 'Two Majors' compares how Ukraine has approached digital command and control, and never made itself reliant on Telegram:
Read 21 tweets
Feb 14
1/ The Russian army is reportedly forcing its soldiers to abandon Telegram and move over to the government-authorised MAX app. A Russian warblogger explains why the transition will prove to be very difficult. ⬇️
2/ 'Unofficial Bezsonov' writes:

"Some challenges of switching from Telegram to MAX for our military personnel.

Telegram doesn't require a Russian number to be linked, making it difficult for adversaries to [de]anonymise users."
3/ "Max requires not only a Russian number but also real data (according to the messenger's rules), which enemy electronic warfare systems will immediately receive (although a Russian number alone is sufficient for the enemy to identify a user).
Read 16 tweets
Feb 14
1/ Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov recently said (very wrongly) that "It's difficult, if not impossible, to imagine ... frontline communications being provided via Telegram or any other messenger." Warblogger Nikita Tretyakov has a list of other 'unimaginables'. ⬇️
2/ "What else is unimaginable?

It's unimaginable that just a week ago, our troops' communications relied on an enemy country's satellite constellation.
3/ "It's unimaginable that soldiers still obtain many essential items for war and military life (anti-thermal blankets, radios, gasoline-powered and electric tools, inverter generators, etc.) almost exclusively from their salaries or from volunteers.
Read 16 tweets
Feb 14
1/ Russian warbloggers are outraged at being told by a journalist that it's their own fault that the Russian government is restricting Telegram. They argue that if not for the warblogger community, the military's lies would have gone unchallenged – which is exactly the point. ⬇️
2/ Komsomolskaya Pravda journalist Ivan Pankin has prompted fury with his claim that "endless nameless insiders, all those endless bloggers, the smartest people on earth who know everything and who have been spreading all sorts of nonsense" have annoyed the Russian government.
3/ He is almost certainly correct, but the warbloggers aren't having any of it and have responded angrily. They claim they have been consistently right in warning about the failures of the Russian military, to the overall benefit of the war effort and Russian population.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(