Listening to @GreeneMan6 this morning I was reminded why I love content in this space so much; His reflection on the discourse surrounding Christian nationalism inspired a profound reflection on the state of my own people and churches.
I have known for a long time that there were two large groups of modern Western Christians; those who have not meaningfully read the Old Testament, and those who pretend that they have not meaningfully read the Old Testament. What I didn't understand until recently is why.
A large proportion of the Old Testament involves God interacting with peoples and leadership classes of peoples in calls to covenant and repentance. You cannot interact with this literature without confronting several realities:
a) The nation, defined ethnically, exists and is a God ordained institution.
b) Nations have elites who are responsible before God for the leadership of their people.
c) Nations do not stop existing because they do not have ethno-states
a) Libs hate these realities and rebel against them.
b) Conservatives cannot confront these realities without confronting their betrayal of their own people.
c) Reactionary's in many nations cannot figure out who their people actually are, because of 20th century migration.
The response from all of these groups is to hide from the OT. To either not read it, to read only very selective portions of it, or to pretend not to understand [or psychologically avoid] the very straight forward implications for their own lives.
As some of you may know, I am current operating "the OT reading challenge" on @iamlambda's discord server, going through the 12 minor prophets of the OT.
I will be posting reflections on each of the books here, some my own, some from others.
This week I read the book of Hosea; the inescapable first reflection on this book is that God calls the nation of Israel, from elites on down, to repentance for their corporate, rather than individual sin.
The role of the dissident is either "prophet" or "counter elite"; our responsibility before God for our nations is either be about the business of calling our elites to repentance, or to be about the business of replacing them as the leaders of our nations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) The E-SG tension
The purpose of the "E" in ESG is to calcify the socio-economic order and forclose new entry into the elite via entrepernerial success.
The purpose of "SG" is to offer rewards to client groups, which has created a pathway for those groups toward the elite.
2) "woke"
Western elites of earlier generations intentionally selected client groups that they believed would never be able to challange them for power [American blacks, Canadian natives, etc...].
The reason Dave Ramsey's financial advice works so well is that most of it isn't really financial advice at all. My wife & I have been through lots of financial ups and downs; from the trials and tribulations of building two buisnesses, to having our house burn down. Reflections:
The best implicit advice you get from someone like Dave Ramsey is also the best advice I could give you; Stop worrying about what other people say or think about your finances, and stop being afraid to confront what you percieve to be your own financial failures.
e.g. Your boomer dad thinks your a loser for not buying a house; so what, don't make your financial decisions to impress him.
e.g. Your ashamed that you can't pay your bills and are ignoring it; grow up and address the problem and stop letting it grow.
Over the last week, the US has seen the second and third largest bank failures in it's history, a profoundly impactful selective bailout, and a change which will affect crypto markets for years to come. Let's dive in 1/🧵:
The Context:
When banks recieve deposits from customers, only a small fraction of the money is kept as cash. The remainder is used to purchase US governments bonds, under a set of guidelines set by the Federal Reserve [Internally, Basil III regs].
When interest rates increase, the value of these bonds declines, creating unrealized losses associated with the deposit business that will have to be realised if a sufficient proportion of clients withdraw cash to exhaust the small proportion set aside for demand deposits.