travis4nh Profile picture
Sep 15 24 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/

On my personal account I had a brief thread about police use of force.

2/

NH state rep @TimothyHorrigan (D) chimed in.

4/
For those not familiar with my conversational style, the phrase "I believe you" is the worst thing I'll say to someone in a debate

"I can't follow your math"
I believe you.

"I don't know why base rates matter"
I believe you.

"I can't tell why this matters".
I believe you
5/

Rep Horrigan assumes, clearly, that his ideological opponents (libertarians and conservatives) always pick a party in a conflict the same way that many progressives do - by racial, ethnic, and gender identity - just with the sign flipped.
6/

In any debate between an LGBT+ group and a private company, obviously the LGBT+ is in the right, because they're better.

In any debate between a racial minority and a white cop, obviously the racial minority is in the right, because they're better.

etc.
7/

(I'm not saying that all progressives think like this - some are more nuanced).
8/

This is "Kegan Level 3" thinking - pure tribalism.

It's common in children and adolescents.

meaningness.com/political-unde…
Image
9/

Rep Horrigan is confused - it would make perfect sense to him if I supported the police while they were punching racial minorities or LGBT marchers, but the idea that I might ANALYZE A PARTICULAR SITUATION and understand the FACTS, and then apply a systematic approach
10/

that considers rule of law, incentives, second order effects ... that's just utterly beyond his analysis.
11/

This is kind of hilarious, because libertarians and conservatives can't shut up about concepts like "rule of law" and "incentives". Like the SNL skit about Buckwheat killing the president "oh, yeah, they talked about it ALL the time!".
12/

What's going on is that Rep Horrigan is failing the Ideological Turing Test - he has zero idea how libertarians and conservatives think, or why they say the things they do.
13/

I mean, he THINKS he knows why we say stuff - many progressives think they know. It's all quite simple: because libertarians and conservatives are dumb, hate children, hate minorities, are afraid of change, etc.
14/

Q: why do libertarians and conservatives oppose windmills?
A: because they hate science

Q: why are many libertarians and conservatives dubious about anthropogenic global warming?
A: because they hate science
15/

Q: why are libertarians and conservatives skeptical about puberty blockers?
A: because they LGBT youth and want them to commit suicide
16/

Q: why do many libertarians and conservatives disagree with the genius Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute on admitting hundreds of millions of immigrants who can't speak English?
A: because they hate brown people

etc.
17/

The Ideological Turing Test is named after the original Turing test, named after it's inventor, Alan Turing, who suggested that the definition of a machine thinking is "can a person talking to the machine tell the difference between it and a human?"
18/
The Ideological Turing Test measures how well members of one ideology can understand the ideology of another group...by passing as a member of the other group in conversation.
19/

Because we live in a post-Constitutional order where the progressive Gramscian Long March Through the Institutions has been completed, and every organ of the government / overculture is 100% left wing (New York Times, State Department, Goldman Sachs, Department of Defense,
20/

...Harvard, SUNY Buffalo, DC Comics...), libertarians and conservatives have absolutely no opportunity to NOT be perfectly well versed in every detail of the leftist ideology.
21/

We can explain pronouns, sustainable energy, the need for affirmative action, why everyone deserves a living wage, etc. until the cows come home.

We disagree with all of this, but we UNDERSTAND it.

Any one of us can pass as a prog if we care too.
22/

The vast majority of Lefties, from former president Obama down to random state reps, have ZERO idea what motivates righties.

econlib.org/archives/2011/…
23/

And thus Rep Horrigan can't wrap his head around why I would support cops, in a particular incident, over white middle class people.

Rep Horrigan
...
...
...
I BELIEVE YOU.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with travis4nh

travis4nh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @travis4nh

Jun 21
The Liberal Arts Educational Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

archive.is/fucSz Image
2/

I'd like to extend consumer law to universities, and prosecute universities for selling dangerous / useless products.

"Unsafe at any speed", but applied to the educational malpractice.

3/

disagree; second-hand trucks have resale value

Read 6 tweets
Jun 21
Towns have an absolute reckless disregard for the resources of the citizens.

Here in Weare they keep the corrupt Naomi Bolton on staff, even though she's explicitly lied to citizens, used her town email to castigate people for their political opinions, and violated RSA 91-A.
2/

Same the the corrupt head of the ZBA Jack Dearborn, who's lied, falsified minutes, failed to recuse himself, failed to read the zoning manual issued by the state, mocked me for caring about it, refused to follow NH SC precedent, etc.

BoS just shrugs and spends $ on lawyers.
3/

The solution is a combination of

* citizens putting up better BoS candidates to replace the corrupt / incompetent ones.

* local lawsuits to force the town's hand

* state level laws creating punishments for egregious violations.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 21
The town of Weare has spent a LOT of money on lawyers.

* false arrest of Bill Alemenan

* false arrest of Carla Gereike

* police assassination of some rando in the Dunkin Donuts parking lot

* police chief sleeping with subordinate, destroying evidence

* Weare v WearePowerful
2/

...and of course my three lawsuits v Weare.

I've requested lawyer invoices under RSA 91-A and the corrupt town administrator Naomi Bolton refused to provide them, saying that they were attorney-client privileged. I had to threaten a lawsuit before she turned them over.
3/

The Board of Selectmen seems to either side with the corrupt employees or to at least be conflict averse and wave their hands "uh, I don't know, let's just let the process play out and see what happens".

Not exactly a great way to minimize taxpayer expenses.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 20
Reflect on why unionized school teachers hate hate hate HATE competition ...
2/

There are 150,000 students in NH.

Towns spend an average of $20,000 per student per year.

Education Freedom Accounts provide from $3k-8k per student.

Charter schools get $7k.

If we fully legalized competition with the monopoly government schools >>>
3/

We'd increase lifetime earnings by $100,000 per student (I believe I RT-ed the study a few days ago), creating $150 BILLION in value.

We'd also save NH taxpayers $2 BILLION per year, or about $2,000 per person per year.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 20
on a non-partisan note: cliffs in benefits are terrible policy.

If you decide that people who have X problem deserve help, and you say "...but only if they earn less than $Z", you create an incentive for someone just barely under $Z to never improve their skills or position
2/

The much smarter design is to phase out benefits gradually - e.g. for every $5 above the cut-off, benefits are reduce by $1.

This keeps incentives aligned- people on benefits would rather earn $5 and keep the $5 plus lose $1 of benefits.
3/

This would actually cost taxpayers less, because many people under the cliff would choose to earn a bit more money, resulting in modest cuts to benefits paid out.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 20
1/

There are two sets of laws out there.

One for us little people, and another entire set of rules for the politically connected Democrat elites.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(