SagasofBharat Profile picture
Sep 15, 2023 9 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Chπιstιαηιty has been portrayed around the myth of mercy & compassion. Is it true?

Converts often blame cruelty in their parent religion (ex Hindus) for the reason of conversion.

Debunking the myth of mercy & exposing the cruelty in Chπιstιαηιty

Thread
Image
Image
Reminder for the converted ricebags.

Xτιαηιτy was never meant to save your souls but to terrify people into obedience. All hail compassionate Jejus. Image
Another inquisitor Bernard Giu says:

either you believe Jεjυs is compassionate & merciful or we will thurst a 🗡️⚔️ in your belly. Of course how compassionate of him for saying this. Image
And by chance if you dare to have any personal view of God which doesn’t match what the Chυπch says, with all benevolence you will be bυπηεδ to δεατh, says Pope Innocent III.

So kind of him.
Image
Image
But this benevolent merciful religion welcomes back heretics too & give u a chance to serve Jεjυs.

But ofcrs there are some punishment you have to undergo. Image
And here are the punishments for heretics as a welcome gift:

1. On three Sundays the penitent is to be stπιρρεd to the waist and scourged by the priest from the entrance of the town to the church door.
Image
Image
2. He is to abstain forever from meat and eggs and cheese, except on Easter, Pentecost, and Christ- mas
Image
Image
3. He is to wear monastic vestments, with a small cross but not like hang it from the neck but actually sew it directly on the skin on each breast.

Can anything be more benevolent than this? & we have to believe this religion taught Indians how to be civilized.

Image
Image
Image
4. But inspite of all this he is to be held as a perjurer and a heretic, and to be segregated from the society of the faithful.

Image
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SagasofBharat

SagasofBharat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SagasofBharat

Apr 1
Did you know?

The Shroud of Turin-often believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ is actually a MEDIAEVAL HOAX

There is no credible evidence linking it to Jesus. Research shows the cloth originated almost 1200 years after Jesus.

And here's your evidence [THREAD]Image
In 1988, three different laboratories performed a radiocarbon analysis of the Shroud of Turin.

All three laboratories independently dated the cloth to 1260–1390 CE -conclusively placing it in the medieval period.

That's roughly 1200-1300 years after the assumed time of Jesus. Image
Image
Not just that.

A contemporary bishop, Pierre d’Arcis (c. 1389), explicitly described it as a cunningly painted fraud used to attract pilgrims and money.

Mediaeval Churches often used to plant such hoaxes to attract huge donations & political influence. Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 23
Title: Can Hindus eat Beef
Then proves Hindus are non-vegetarians.

Bro Non-veg ≠ beef

Hindus are against Cow slaughter from Vedic times (SS 1)
to Mohandas Gandhi (SS 2).
Father of nation cancel now?

Punishment for cow slaughter has always been brutal in India [THREAD] Image
Image
This is what Ibn Battuta wrote:

"Killing or eating a cow was strictly forbidden; anyone caught doing it were punished with death in this country"

That has always been the stance of Hindus from Vedic times. Image
Rajput Maharana Kumbha:

"When reports reached this brave Rajput king that Mohammedans were keeling cows in Nagor, He started with 50,000 horsemen to attack Nagor putting 1000s of Mohamedans to sword." Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 18
Dear illiterate,

Mughals invested everything they had?

Their own autobiography says they had nothing to invest. But came to Hindustan to loot.

Thread 👇🏼- Dismantling both the myth:

1. Mughals invested everything they had
2. "Rajput-blood" made Mughals, Indian Image
Image
-Babur himself says in his autobiography he was in great poverty, so he slaughtered Hindus to take their lands.

-Shahjahan didn't commission Taj Mahal with money from his own pocket.
He charged exorbitant taxes from peasants & selling their women & children as slaves. Image
Image
Image
Image
Jahangir's mother was a Rajput who after marriage became Mariam-uz-zamani.

But Rajput blood didn't stop him from putting Sikh Guru Arjun to death after confiscating his property & as well as his children.

His crime:
Following his faith other than Islam and putting Tilak on his son Khusrau.Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 17
Wrong!

India’s GDP:
Before Mughals -33%
After Mughal loot- 24-16%

Mughal court physician, Bernier exposes your lies. He records a steady drain of India’s gold and silver under Mughal rule.

THREAD on how much each Mughal sent India’s wealth to other Islamic nations. 👇🏼 Image
Image
Image
1. BABUR used to distribute the wealth looted from Bharat to every tribe of Afghan, Hazara, arab, Biluch etc.

Valuables were sent to Samarkand, khurasan, kashaghar & Iraq.

Source: Babur’s own Autobiography Babur Nama.

Huge amounts of almost 3-4 lakhs were being sent to Kabul Image
Image
Image
2. Akbar opened his purse wide for Mohamedans to go to hajj. Every year he used to send gifts & huge funds during hajj from the treasury of Bharat.

Source: Humayun Nama

In 1576, Mughal Hajj Caravan to Mecca carried enormous donation of 600,000 rupees. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 27
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”

Did you know?

There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.

The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.

This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.

Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.Image
Image
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.

ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed. Image
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”

Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 17
As we are talking about Nalanda,
Attaching below all my previous posts where i categorically dismantled the lies peddled by Ruchika Sharma on Nalanda.

I am blocked by her. So feel free to use my posts wherever she lies. 👇🏼 Image
Image
Confession from eye-witness account clearly mentioning the religion that destroyed Nalanda.

Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(