Chπιstιαηιty has been portrayed around the myth of mercy & compassion. Is it true?
Converts often blame cruelty in their parent religion (ex Hindus) for the reason of conversion.
Debunking the myth of mercy & exposing the cruelty in Chπιstιαηιty
Thread
Reminder for the converted ricebags.
Xτιαηιτy was never meant to save your souls but to terrify people into obedience. All hail compassionate Jejus.
Another inquisitor Bernard Giu says:
either you believe Jεjυs is compassionate & merciful or we will thurst a 🗡️⚔️ in your belly. Of course how compassionate of him for saying this.
And by chance if you dare to have any personal view of God which doesn’t match what the Chυπch says, with all benevolence you will be bυπηεδ to δεατh, says Pope Innocent III.
So kind of him.
But this benevolent merciful religion welcomes back heretics too & give u a chance to serve Jεjυs.
But ofcrs there are some punishment you have to undergo.
And here are the punishments for heretics as a welcome gift:
1. On three Sundays the penitent is to be stπιρρεd to the waist and scourged by the priest from the entrance of the town to the church door.
2. He is to abstain forever from meat and eggs and cheese, except on Easter, Pentecost, and Christ- mas
3. He is to wear monastic vestments, with a small cross but not like hang it from the neck but actually sew it directly on the skin on each breast.
Can anything be more benevolent than this? & we have to believe this religion taught Indians how to be civilized.
4. But inspite of all this he is to be held as a perjurer and a heretic, and to be segregated from the society of the faithful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Columbus invading America wasn't an act of bravery He risked himself for greed.
The Capitulations of Santa Fe was a contract between Catholic Monarch & Columbus which promised him 10% share of everything he captures in his conquest.
Colonialism & savagery is getting repackaged here as some huge favour.
The truth is it was the colonialists who were savages and the lands they invaded were highly developed civilizations that had already built government, roads, farms, roads etc.
Momedan terrorists attacked National emblem at Hazratbal, calling it blasphemy.
Do you know what this shrine is famed for?
A hair- Prophet's hair
If damaging Ashok Emblem shocks u here's a story how they once had unleashed nationwide riots & Hindu Genocide over this hair.
Syed Abdullah Madani, a supposed descendant of Mohd, brought a Hair to India & claimed that it was Islamic Prophet Mohd's hair- Moi-e-Muqqaddas
That hair is worshipped at Hazratbal Dargah.
So much for "Idol worship is against our religious beliefs"
In 1963, this hair went missing from the dargah & what followed was a riot all over Kashmir & a horror show for Hindus even in Bangladesh.
If you are shocked at the vandalism of Ashoka emblem, imagine the scene when thousands of Mussalmans poured onto the streets of Kashmir to show their anger at the disappearance of a hair.
And we Hindus are sitting silently at the vandalism of 1000s of our temples fighting court cases.
Ruchika the historian with a PhD is asking for the source of 5000 inmates in Akbar's Harem.
It's literally Ain-i-Akbari written by his own court Historian Abul Fazl.
If that's not the first book you read on Akbar it's time to revoke your degree.
Here’s Abul Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari confirming Akbar had 5000 women in his harem.
Not all royal wives-some were freeborn while many were slaves married without consent.
But sure, Ruchika the "feminist" sees no problem in shielding such a man.
Akbar was a known sexual predator with an insatiable
sexual appetite. He used to send eunuchs to hunt for fresh women into the household of his own nobles & pick up their daughters at his whims. Women had no choice & were treated as mere pawns.
Imagine calling yourself a feminist after defending such a man.