Chπιstιαηιty has been portrayed around the myth of mercy & compassion. Is it true?
Converts often blame cruelty in their parent religion (ex Hindus) for the reason of conversion.
Debunking the myth of mercy & exposing the cruelty in Chπιstιαηιty
Thread
Reminder for the converted ricebags.
Xτιαηιτy was never meant to save your souls but to terrify people into obedience. All hail compassionate Jejus.
Another inquisitor Bernard Giu says:
either you believe Jεjυs is compassionate & merciful or we will thurst a 🗡️⚔️ in your belly. Of course how compassionate of him for saying this.
And by chance if you dare to have any personal view of God which doesn’t match what the Chυπch says, with all benevolence you will be bυπηεδ to δεατh, says Pope Innocent III.
So kind of him.
But this benevolent merciful religion welcomes back heretics too & give u a chance to serve Jεjυs.
But ofcrs there are some punishment you have to undergo.
And here are the punishments for heretics as a welcome gift:
1. On three Sundays the penitent is to be stπιρρεd to the waist and scourged by the priest from the entrance of the town to the church door.
2. He is to abstain forever from meat and eggs and cheese, except on Easter, Pentecost, and Christ- mas
3. He is to wear monastic vestments, with a small cross but not like hang it from the neck but actually sew it directly on the skin on each breast.
Can anything be more benevolent than this? & we have to believe this religion taught Indians how to be civilized.
4. But inspite of all this he is to be held as a perjurer and a heretic, and to be segregated from the society of the faithful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Momedan terrorists attacked National emblem at Hazratbal, calling it blasphemy.
Do you know what this shrine is famed for?
A hair- Prophet's hair
If damaging Ashok Emblem shocks u here's a story how they once had unleashed nationwide riots & Hindu Genocide over this hair.
Syed Abdullah Madani, a supposed descendant of Mohd, brought a Hair to India & claimed that it was Islamic Prophet Mohd's hair- Moi-e-Muqqaddas
That hair is worshipped at Hazratbal Dargah.
So much for "Idol worship is against our religious beliefs"
In 1963, this hair went missing from the dargah & what followed was a riot all over Kashmir & a horror show for Hindus even in Bangladesh.
If you are shocked at the vandalism of Ashoka emblem, imagine the scene when thousands of Mussalmans poured onto the streets of Kashmir to show their anger at the disappearance of a hair.
And we Hindus are sitting silently at the vandalism of 1000s of our temples fighting court cases.
Ruchika the historian with a PhD is asking for the source of 5000 inmates in Akbar's Harem.
It's literally Ain-i-Akbari written by his own court Historian Abul Fazl.
If that's not the first book you read on Akbar it's time to revoke your degree.
Here’s Abul Fazl in Ain-i-Akbari confirming Akbar had 5000 women in his harem.
Not all royal wives-some were freeborn while many were slaves married without consent.
But sure, Ruchika the "feminist" sees no problem in shielding such a man.
Akbar was a known sexual predator with an insatiable
sexual appetite. He used to send eunuchs to hunt for fresh women into the household of his own nobles & pick up their daughters at his whims. Women had no choice & were treated as mere pawns.
Imagine calling yourself a feminist after defending such a man.
Ruchika asks NCERT where it is written that Jiziya is an incentive to convert.
The concept of jizya in Quran (9.29) targets those who refuse to convert. It is meant to humiliate non-Muslims.
Islamic commentator Al-Zamakhshari echoes the same - jizya should be made so heavy and degrading that people convert just to escape the shame and burden.”
This was followed during the time of Mughals as well
-Non muslim taxpayer should himself come to pay the tax.
-Non muslim will stand while the muslim collector should be seated.
-the hands of the non Muslim should be below the Muslim to show their inferiority.
Alauddin Khilji sought advice from Qazi Mughsiuddin who advised him that while Collecting Kharaj the Muslim collector should spit inside the mouth of the Non Muslim.
Oh yes Thook jihad was openly practiced at that time. 🤮
I am surprised so many people didn't even read Ramayana?
Let me try & educate:
Myth 1: Ram never cared about surpanakha's appearance.
Reality: Shri Ram & Lakshman literally made fun of Surpanakha's appearance in Aranya Kanda sarga 18.
Myth 2: Sita was from Nepal & naturally brown skinned
Sita was from Mithila mentioned in Ramayana many times.
Shri Ram explicitly described Sita In Ramayana having smooth skin & complexion like rose apple.
(So She was Definitely not pimple faced like Sai pallavi.)
Myth 3: There is no mention Surpanakha was ugly/ she initially went undetected by shape shifting.
Reality: 1. In Shurpanakha's 1st appearance in front of Shri Ram She is described as:
-facially unpleasant
-Pot bellied
-Coppery haired
-ugly featured
-brass voiced
-deplorably oldish
-crooked talker
-uncouth
-ill mannered
-abominable.
She appeared in the scene in her real ugly self & only mentioned she can shape shift. She didn't go undetected. She honestly mentioned who she was