Chπιstιαηιty has been portrayed around the myth of mercy & compassion. Is it true?
Converts often blame cruelty in their parent religion (ex Hindus) for the reason of conversion.
Debunking the myth of mercy & exposing the cruelty in Chπιstιαηιty
Thread
Reminder for the converted ricebags.
Xτιαηιτy was never meant to save your souls but to terrify people into obedience. All hail compassionate Jejus.
Another inquisitor Bernard Giu says:
either you believe Jεjυs is compassionate & merciful or we will thurst a 🗡️⚔️ in your belly. Of course how compassionate of him for saying this.
And by chance if you dare to have any personal view of God which doesn’t match what the Chυπch says, with all benevolence you will be bυπηεδ to δεατh, says Pope Innocent III.
So kind of him.
But this benevolent merciful religion welcomes back heretics too & give u a chance to serve Jεjυs.
But ofcrs there are some punishment you have to undergo.
And here are the punishments for heretics as a welcome gift:
1. On three Sundays the penitent is to be stπιρρεd to the waist and scourged by the priest from the entrance of the town to the church door.
2. He is to abstain forever from meat and eggs and cheese, except on Easter, Pentecost, and Christ- mas
3. He is to wear monastic vestments, with a small cross but not like hang it from the neck but actually sew it directly on the skin on each breast.
Can anything be more benevolent than this? & we have to believe this religion taught Indians how to be civilized.
4. But inspite of all this he is to be held as a perjurer and a heretic, and to be segregated from the society of the faithful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”
Did you know?
There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.
The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.
This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.
Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.
ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed.
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”
Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for.
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves
Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.
Fact: 1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.
2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.
3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.
4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.
5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.
6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities
Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.
Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall
Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.
Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.
William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)
Ruchika: That never happened.
Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.
No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.
And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.
Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.
Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.
Let's debunk her lies.
Ruchika's claim :
Education was only limited to upper castes
Fact check:
Surveys done by the British themselves debunk this lie as Shudra scholars were the highest in number amongst Hindus.
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂
Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.
GREEK SOURCES:
1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.
2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.