When they said they will not stop, they didn't just mean me.
They continue to harass women and children who reject their narrative.
This account - linked to David Gorski - devoted itself to harassing a mother by posting her home on its profile.
Here's a question...
If your #bestvaccineever actually worked, why would you need to:
▶️threaten
▶️harass
▶️intimidate
▶️bully
Because it doesn't.
Most of the people you label "antivaxxers" have had plenty of vaccines.
But you got greedy. You took millions of dollars from the pharma companies and agreed to hound down anybody that disagreed with you even when people were dying because your drug trials were false.
So you decided to make bullying networks to hound people down.
You did this to
▶️doctors
▶️nurses
▶️politicians
▶️mothers
▶️fathers
▶️vaccine injury victims
Threatening everybody that disagreed with you.
And the result?
You created the biggest generation of "antivaxxers" in history.
The whole world now hates #BigPharma and the vaccine industry because of the dirty tricks you were using.
And even your own people are now deserting you.
10% of the #shotsheard group ditched you when we shone the light on them this week.
Why?
Wasn't it an honourable endeavour?...
Or was it just a money laundering scheme based on its founders getting millions of dollars from undisclosed donors (presumably Pharma corporations through BIO and other lobby groups). brokentruth.com/pharma-lobbyis…
But you failed to realise that every time you do this, the public are going to turn against you.
And every million dollar donation will mean that people will look at you and ask "why did the Public Good Project suddenly get millions of dollars 2 years before the pandemic?"
Oh, don't just take my word for it.
Here is Joe Smyser, CEO of Shots Heard, Project VCTR and the inappropriately named "Public Good Project".
In his own words.
"Antivaxxers are not nice people".
Really Joe?
Did you ever meet one?
So, here's a question for Joe Smyser.
Did you approve of or coordinate the targeted harassment (incl doxxing) of families, nurses and doctors in order to coerce the population into taking an experimental gene therapy vaccine?
Actually, don't bother. We know the answer.
Meanwhile, here are the people underpinning #shotsheard and the propaganda empire above it.
Listen to what they think of you.
Todd Wolynn - co-founder of shots heard:
"My job is to get you to be compliant... eat a healthy diet or get vaccinated"
Direct link to the video featuring Beth Hoffman (co-founder of the #shotsheard facebook group), Todd Wolynn (co-founder of shots heard) and Jaime Sidani, Beth Hoffman's co-author on multiple papers on reprogramming the population to accept vaccines. pitt.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/…
Oops and just one thing...
Todd forgot to mention that he received over $200,000 in fees from 4 of our favourite Pharma companies.
Can't imagine why.
#ShotsGate
@BrokenTruthTV
Many of these accounts don't link to the big #shotsheard style accounts directly but through intermediaries, and as this account is likely to disappear here is the link claimed in the first tweet.
Only 1 follower. Sock account.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.
To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.
The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.
The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.
Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.
It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".
There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.
This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews. cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…
your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.
Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.
The dude keeps going, but betrays that this is a copycat to a bunch of accounts linked to one dubbed "Penguin" that only appeared when I pointed out the Joe Sansone scam that is being coordinated by Sasha Latypova to derail legal cases.