When they said they will not stop, they didn't just mean me.
They continue to harass women and children who reject their narrative.
This account - linked to David Gorski - devoted itself to harassing a mother by posting her home on its profile.
Here's a question...
If your #bestvaccineever actually worked, why would you need to:
▶️threaten
▶️harass
▶️intimidate
▶️bully
Because it doesn't.
Most of the people you label "antivaxxers" have had plenty of vaccines.
But you got greedy. You took millions of dollars from the pharma companies and agreed to hound down anybody that disagreed with you even when people were dying because your drug trials were false.
So you decided to make bullying networks to hound people down.
You did this to
▶️doctors
▶️nurses
▶️politicians
▶️mothers
▶️fathers
▶️vaccine injury victims
Threatening everybody that disagreed with you.
And the result?
You created the biggest generation of "antivaxxers" in history.
The whole world now hates #BigPharma and the vaccine industry because of the dirty tricks you were using.
And even your own people are now deserting you.
10% of the #shotsheard group ditched you when we shone the light on them this week.
Why?
Wasn't it an honourable endeavour?...
Or was it just a money laundering scheme based on its founders getting millions of dollars from undisclosed donors (presumably Pharma corporations through BIO and other lobby groups). brokentruth.com/pharma-lobbyis…
But you failed to realise that every time you do this, the public are going to turn against you.
And every million dollar donation will mean that people will look at you and ask "why did the Public Good Project suddenly get millions of dollars 2 years before the pandemic?"
Oh, don't just take my word for it.
Here is Joe Smyser, CEO of Shots Heard, Project VCTR and the inappropriately named "Public Good Project".
In his own words.
"Antivaxxers are not nice people".
Really Joe?
Did you ever meet one?
So, here's a question for Joe Smyser.
Did you approve of or coordinate the targeted harassment (incl doxxing) of families, nurses and doctors in order to coerce the population into taking an experimental gene therapy vaccine?
Actually, don't bother. We know the answer.
Meanwhile, here are the people underpinning #shotsheard and the propaganda empire above it.
Listen to what they think of you.
Todd Wolynn - co-founder of shots heard:
"My job is to get you to be compliant... eat a healthy diet or get vaccinated"
Direct link to the video featuring Beth Hoffman (co-founder of the #shotsheard facebook group), Todd Wolynn (co-founder of shots heard) and Jaime Sidani, Beth Hoffman's co-author on multiple papers on reprogramming the population to accept vaccines. pitt.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/…
Oops and just one thing...
Todd forgot to mention that he received over $200,000 in fees from 4 of our favourite Pharma companies.
Can't imagine why.
#ShotsGate
@BrokenTruthTV
Many of these accounts don't link to the big #shotsheard style accounts directly but through intermediaries, and as this account is likely to disappear here is the link claimed in the first tweet.
Only 1 follower. Sock account.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.
There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.
It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.
It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.
If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.
But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.
She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.
None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.
But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...