▶️ "Immune imprinting induced by wildtype (WT)-based vaccination would compromise the antibody response to Omicron-based boosters"biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
3) ▶️ Single Omicron-boosting is heavily limited by immune imprinting, especially when using variants antigenically distinct from WT, like XBB"
▶️ "Repeated Omicron infections could also alleviate WT-vaccination-induced immune imprinting and generate high neutralizing titers ...
4) ...against XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16"
▶️ "Our findings suggest the WT component should be abandoned when updating COVID-19 vaccine antigen compositions to XBB lineages, and those who haven’t been exposed to Omicron yet should receive two updated vaccine boosters."
5) Fig. 2 | Humoral immune imprinting after repeated Omicron infections in humans.
6) Fig. 3 B cell immune imprinting after repeated Omicron infections.
7) Fig. 4 Epitope distribution and characterization of mAbs elicited by Omicron BTI and reinfection
8) Fig. 5 | Estimate the evolutionary trends of XBB.1.5 RBD from DMS profiles.
9) Fig. 6 Combination of escape mutations evades XBB.1.5-neutralizing antibodies from reinfection.
10) Extended Data Fig. 7 SPR sensorgrams for affinity of hACEZ and SARS-CoV-2 mutants RBD
11) Thanks for reading 🙏 and let see the reaction of the experts on this subject 😁
2) The 2022 North American HPAI outbreak was driven by repeated virus introductions from Europe/Asia via wild migratory birds. A single Atlantic flyway introduction spread rapidly across the continent.
3) Waterfowl and shorebirds were the main viral reservoirs, while other species were dead-end hosts. Unlike past outbreaks, farms experienced many independent introductions from wild birds, not extensive farm-to-farm spread.
This study shows that SARS-CoV-2 is more closely related to the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) than the flu virus.
Thanks to @DavidJoffe64
for the study tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
2) Scientists shows that the membrane protein of SARS-CoV-2 has similar structural features to the MERS virus, like a distinct kink in the transmembrane region. This suggests SARS-CoV-2 and MERS viruses may interact with cells and the body in more comparable ways.
3) Additionally, the SARS-CoV-2 membrane protein exhibited stronger binding to the cell membrane, indicating greater stability within the infected cell. This contrasts with the flu virus, which has different mechanisms for infecting and reproducing in the body.
2) The spike protein is the key part of coronaviruses that allows them to infect and enter human cells. Compared to other SARS-related coronaviruses found in animals, the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is more efficient at binding to the human ACE2 receptor.
3) This makes SARS-CoV-2 better able to infect and spread in humans.
The SARS-CoV-2 spike also tends to adopt an "open" shape that is more primed for binding and entering human cells. In contrast, the spikes of animal coronaviruses are often in a "closed" shape, which is better
Amazing study which identified over 1.3 million viral genomes in the freshwater lake, highlighting the enormous untapped viral diversity in these ecosystems. nature.com/articles/s4156…
2) This study highlights the critical importance of understanding viruses in freshwater ecosystems, as these environments face rapid changes due to human activities. Viruses actively shape key global processes like photosynthesis and nutrient cycling, so their roles are vital.
3) As climate change and human impacts transform lakes and rivers, studying viral communities becomes crucial. Only by understanding the complex interactions between viruses, microbes, and the environment can we predict and manage the cascading effects on ecosystems.
Why are we experiencing a PROLONGED "POLYPANDEMIC" CRISIS?
(2nd part)
How Animal Viruses Threaten Human Health and Why We Must Protect Ourselves from Zoonotic Infections ? nature.com/articles/s4156…
2) The study identifies key animal viruses that may pose zoonotic risks to humans. It emphasizes that viruses with broad human cell tropism, particularly those from non-human mammals like bats and rodents, show potential for cross-species transmission.
3) Over 70% of receptor-binding proteins (RBPs) tested came from these non-human sources. Additionally, emerging viruses such as Sinu virus and Wellfleet Bay virus can enter human cells, indicating the need for monitoring.