Note the cells ‘rescue’ the linear DNA with integration.
The plasmid they used in the above study doesn’t have an SV40 72 base enhancer element that Dean et al demonstrate to enhance these efficiencies due to its nuclear targeting sequence.
They cut the vector at BsaI leaving that red arrow.
They other 25-40% of the vector has no GFP tracer for integration. That will under estimate the linear risk if they normalized based on molecules.
🔥New PrePrint out🔥
Hyper-stimulatory N⁶-methyladenine (m6A) in residual SV40 plasmid DNA in mRNA vaccines.
@RetsefL @weldeiry @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @KMilhoanMDPhD
Oxford Nanopore Sequencing reveals Pfizer didnt use a Dam knock out E.coli strain and the resulting plasmid DNA contamination is hyper stimulatory to the cGAS-STING pathway. zenodo.org/records/172724…
Also evident in this data is that their plasmid linearization step is incomplete , thus running the risk of full length replication competent plasmid DNA being left in the vials.
Feline Friday is cooking up more Nanopore reads and they are damning.
You asked for it. This is an Algo experiment.
Does the Feline Friday crowd have more reach. Aka the internet loves cats.
Here are some long NanoPurr reads.
The Topic…
“Since Pfizer Linearizes the plasmid, it’s not replication competent”..
Amirite?
The problem with all the intellectual slaves that worship everything their authority figures do, is they become lazy and complacent with the truth.
Did any of these people ever measure the efficiency of the plasmid linearization step?
I did.
This will be a bit deep.
Need to get my mind off something.
Pfizer performs this step but like all liability free steps, no one checks if it’s complete.
Big consequences if they fail… not for them but their mandated consumers.
Are you frustrated with the schizo behavior of @POTUS on the vaccines.
Me too.
The Ping Pong is intentional.
One week, Ron Johnson
Then Kirk.
Then ACIP
Then space Vax out/Tylenol
Then demand Pfizer cough up $70B in discounts.
You are witnessing
The Crossruff.
What is a crossruff?
It’s a bridge technique (card game) to maximize points in a pre-negotiated game where you have asymmetric strength in different partners.
If you understand the crossruff,
You’ll begin to see what’s happening.
It’s cold, calculated and maximizing of political gain.
By going hard on Pharma one week,
They come the table next week.
You return fire with some compromises with Pharma and play the rebound from the other side to escalate more extraction from Pharma.
It’s not 4D chess.
It’s a known technique in Bridge to maximize your Trump cards.
6 activities of Pfizer DNA
1)Nuclear Targeting Sequence (Dean)
2)Somatic Hypermutability element (Senigl)
3)Binds P53 (Drayman)
4)DAM/DCM methylation = cGAS-STING activation (Kwon et al)
5)Replication Competent without TAG
6)Prone to integrate (Strayer/Lim)
Finally, a cannabis adverse events database.
Long overdue to end all the receipt-free speculation.
Note the average age is 56y/o suggestive of polypharmacy and p450 collisions.
@Aelxberenson Gonna have to rename that book
People over 50 are on more blood thinners and other meds that rely on CYP2C9/19 and CYP3A4.
Note there are more Adverse events for products with high CBD/THC ratios related to Hallucinations, Dyspenia, Anxiety etc. That is likely a p450 collision as CBD isnt psychoactive in this way.
Lets look at the Adverse event frequency. 1-2 per 100,000 users.
mandated liability free vaccines = 1:800 from Dr. Joseph Fraiman
Note, over 80% of the SAEs with Cannabis the patient is using it for medical purposes also suggesting confounders and polypharmacy. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/